Hi Mario,
On Mon, Oct 24, 2022 at 04:49:08PM +0200, Mario Loffredo wrote:
> I apologize but I just realized that I put an Informational RFC, namely
> 6973, among the Normative References.
>
> Since the doment is still in WGLC, I would like to know if you agree on
> moving that reference to the In
Tom pointed out to me you said WGLC not RFCED. If its in WGLC I think
you can make this change as it's obvious, and should be resolved
before it exits WGLC
-G
On Tue, Oct 25, 2022 at 9:39 AM George Michaelson wrote:
>
> It's the right thing to do. You should definitely ask the RFC editor
> to mo
It's the right thing to do. You should definitely ask the RFC editor
to modify this.
-G
On Tue, Oct 25, 2022 at 12:52 AM Mario Loffredo
wrote:
>
> Hi folks,
>
> I apologize but I just realized that I put an Informational RFC, namely
> 6973, among the Normative References.
>
> Since the doment is
Hi folks,
I apologize but I just realized that I put an Informational RFC, namely
6973, among the Normative References.
Since the doment is still in WGLC, I would like to know if you agree on
moving that reference to the Information References.
Looking forward to your input to correct the d
