Hi Pawel,
On Tue, Oct 22, 2024 at 08:51:32AM +0200, kowa...@denic.de wrote:
> On 21.10.24 23:57, Tom Harrison wrote:
>> [...] In the absence of any text permitting partial implementation,
>> this text requires implementers to implement the whole document
>> ("the functionality specified in this do
Hi Pawel,
Beside the discussion with Tom, want to highlight one other point you made.
Thanks,
Jasdip
From: kowa...@denic.de
Date: Monday, October 21, 2024 at 3:30 AM
To: regext@ietf.org
Subject: [regext] Re: Extension Identifiers in draft-ietf-regext-rdap-rir-search
Also 2.3.1 of draft
Hi Tom,
On 21.10.24 23:57, Tom Harrison wrote:
Hi Pawel,
On Mon, Oct 21, 2024 at 09:29:49AM +0200,kowa...@denic.de wrote:
[...] In the absence of any text
permitting partial implementation, this text requires implementers to
implement the whole document ("the functionality specified in this
doc
Hi Pawel,
On Mon, Oct 21, 2024 at 09:29:49AM +0200, kowa...@denic.de wrote:
> The ambiguity seems to be also there because /domains path segment
> is used the same in both context of RIR and domain name registry.
> The draft puts however RIR in focus. This poses an interesting
> question - if a do
e=CID-40*&role=technical”.
Jasdip
*From: *Hollenbeck, Scott
*Date: *Friday, October 11, 2024 at 8:19 AM
*To: *mario.loffredo=40iit.cnr...@dmarc.ietf.org
, Jasdip Singh
, a...@hxr.us , regext@ietf.org
*Subject: *RE: Re: [regext] Re: Extension Identifiers in
draft-ietf-regext-rdap-ri
Hi Scott,
On Wed, Oct 09, 2024 at 11:57:09AM +, Hollenbeck, Scott wrote:
> In another thread focused on the extensions draft, I was asked
> "Would you like regext to revisit Reverse Search?" That prompted me
> to take another look at the draft. It currently defines five
> extension identifiers
beck, Scott
Date: Friday, October 11, 2024 at 8:19 AM
To: mario.loffredo=40iit.cnr...@dmarc.ietf.org
, Jasdip Singh ,
a...@hxr.us , regext@ietf.org
Subject: RE: Re: [regext] Re: Extension Identifiers in
draft-ietf-regext-rdap-rir-search
From: Mario Loffredo
Sent: Friday, October 11, 2024 2:44 A
From: Mario Loffredo
Sent: Friday, October 11, 2024 2:44 AM
To: Hollenbeck, Scott ; jasd...@arin.net;
a...@hxr.us; regext@ietf.org
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [regext] Re: Extension Identifiers in
draft-ietf-regext-rdap-rir-search
Caution: This email originated from outside the organization. Do
tt ; a...@hxr.us;
regext@ietf.org
*Subject:* [EXTERNAL] Re: [regext] Re: Extension Identifiers in
draft-ietf-regext-rdap-rir-search
*Caution:*This email originated from outside the organization. Do not
click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and
know the content is safe.
We
@ietf.org
Cc: mario.loffr...@iit.cnr.it
Subject: RE: [regext] Re: Extension Identifiers in
draft-ietf-regext-rdap-rir-search
Yes, we do, but I would still like to request that the shepherd writeup include
a description of the situation with respect to the extension identifiers and
non
: Wednesday, October 9, 2024 at 12:30 PM
To: Jasdip Singh mailto:jasd...@arin.net>>,
a...@hxr.us<mailto:a...@hxr.us> mailto:a...@hxr.us>>,
regext@ietf.org<mailto:regext@ietf.org>
mailto:regext@ietf.org>>
Subject: RE: [regext] Re: Extension Identifiers in
draft-
We agree. :)
Jasdip
From: Hollenbeck, Scott
Date: Wednesday, October 9, 2024 at 12:30 PM
To: Jasdip Singh , a...@hxr.us , regext@ietf.org
Subject: RE: [regext] Re: Extension Identifiers in
draft-ietf-regext-rdap-rir-search
From: Jasdip Singh
Sent: Wednesday, October 9, 2024 11:54 AM
To
From: Jasdip Singh
Sent: Wednesday, October 9, 2024 11:54 AM
To: Hollenbeck, Scott ; a...@hxr.us; regext@ietf.org
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [regext] Re: Extension Identifiers in
draft-ietf-regext-rdap-rir-search
Caution: This email originated from outside the organization. Do not click
links
issue. One can define new child segments under it.
Jasdip
From: Hollenbeck, Scott
Date: Wednesday, October 9, 2024 at 11:48 AM
To: a...@hxr.us , regext@ietf.org
Subject: [regext] Re: Extension Identifiers in draft-ietf-regext-rdap-rir-search
From: Andrew Newton (andy)
Sent: Wednesday, October 9
From: Andrew Newton (andy)
Sent: Wednesday, October 9, 2024 11:41 AM
To: Hollenbeck, Scott ; regext@ietf.org
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [regext] Extension Identifiers in
draft-ietf-regext-rdap-rir-search
Caution: This email originated from outside the organization. Do not click
links or open a
Scott,
This was discussed in this working group on this list by me and others.
I even proposed something similar. However, absent some functional
deficiency or harm, I do not favor re-opening this issue post WGLC. It
may not have been the way I would have done it, but to my knowledge it
works
16 matches
Mail list logo
