Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [regext] New Version Notification for
draft-regext-brown-epp-ttl-01.txt
On Tue, Sep 27, 2022 at 9:17 AM Gould, James
mailto:40verisign@dmarc.ietf.org>>
wrote:
Gavin,
I believe the domain-level TTL applies to the records it owns, which include
the DS, NS, a
On Tue, Sep 27, 2022 at 9:17 AM Gould, James wrote:
> Gavin,
>
> I believe the domain-level TTL applies to the records it owns, which
> include the DS, NS, and DNAME. The host-level TTL applies to the records
> it owns, which include the A and . In your examples, if we're talking
> about th
Gavin,
I believe the domain-level TTL applies to the records it owns, which include
the DS, NS, and DNAME. The host-level TTL applies to the records it owns,
which include the A and . In your examples, if we're talking about the NS
TTL of the example.com delegating name server ns1.exampl
Thanks Rick and Jim for the feedback. I am happy to accept the idea of the
extension working for both domain and host objects and will work towards making
that a part of the next version.
One point for possible further discussion is the "priority" of TTL values: I am
going to state that the TTL
Hey Jim,
> On 14 Sep 2022, at 13:35, Gould, James wrote:
>
> Gavin,
>
> Thank you for publishing a new version of the draft. I have the following
> feedback:
>
> • Shouldn’t the track be Standards Track instead of Experimental since
> this seems very straight forward?
Since it's cu
