Re: [regext] I18ndir early review of draft-ietf-regext-epp-eai-10

2022-08-17 Thread Gould, James
Yoshiro, Now that you're clear, can you change the review "Ready with Issues" status in the tracker? Thanks, -- JG James Gould Fellow Engineer jgo...@verisign.com 703-948-3271 12061 Bluemont Way Reston, VA 20190 Verisign.com On 7/28/22, 12:20 PM, "Yoshiro Y

Re: [regext] I18ndir early review of draft-ietf-regext-epp-eai-10

2022-07-28 Thread Yoshiro YONEYA
Hi James, My apologies not responding sooner. Thank you for your detailed explanation and I'm clear now. As Dmitry responded, this operational clarification hopefully to be explained in UA guidance or so of ICANN. Regards, Yoshiro YONEYA On Thu, 28 Jul 2022 13:41:49 + "Gould, James" wrote

Re: [regext] I18ndir early review of draft-ietf-regext-epp-eai-10

2022-07-28 Thread Gould, James
Yoshiro, I wanted to follow-up on your feedback. I provided clarification in my response below to your feedback. Does this clarification address your feedback, or do you have any additional feedback? Thanks, -- JG James Gould Fellow Engineer jgo...@verisign.com 703-948-3271 12061 Bl

Re: [regext] I18ndir early review of draft-ietf-regext-epp-eai-10

2022-06-08 Thread Gould, James
Yoshiro, Thank you for the review and feedback. I include a response to your minor issue embedded below. -- JG James Gould Fellow Engineer jgo...@verisign.com 703-948-3271 12061 Bluemont Way Reston, VA 20190 Verisign.com On 6/1/22, 9:04 PM, "Yoshiro Yoneya

Re: [regext] I18ndir early review of draft-ietf-regext-epp-eai-10

2022-06-05 Thread Dmitry Belyavsky
Dear Yoshiro, On Thu, Jun 2, 2022 at 3:04 AM Yoshiro Yoneya via Datatracker < nore...@ietf.org> wrote: > Reviewer: Yoshiro Yoneya > Review result: Ready with Issues > > Summary: > > This draft is in good shape regarding protocol. Regarding to operation, > having an additional guidance for

[regext] I18ndir early review of draft-ietf-regext-epp-eai-10

2022-06-01 Thread Yoshiro Yoneya via Datatracker
Reviewer: Yoshiro Yoneya Review result: Ready with Issues Summary: This draft is in good shape regarding protocol. Regarding to operation, having an additional guidance for registrar transfer from EAI supporting registrar to non EAI supporting registrar would be better. Major issues: N