Hi Andy,
please find my comments inline.
Il 07/12/2023 21:05, Andrew Newton ha scritto:
On Tue, Nov 28, 2023 at 5:39 AM Mario Loffredo
wrote:
[ML] Since it talks about "content negotiation", rdap-x regards clients
signaling their preferences about response extensions or, at most,
extensions
On Tue, Nov 28, 2023 at 5:39 AM Mario Loffredo
wrote:
>
> [ML] Since it talks about "content negotiation", rdap-x regards clients
> signaling their preferences about response extensions or, at most,
> extensions involving both the response and the request.
>
> With regard to pure request extension
Hi Andy,
again my comments inline.
Il 27/11/2023 22:58, Andrew Newton ha scritto:
My comments are inline:
On Fri, Nov 17, 2023 at 7:18 AM Mario Loffredo
wrote:
[ML] Per what is stated in RFC 9083 Section 4.1, a pure request extension
doesn't have to be included in the rdapConformance array
My comments are inline:
On Fri, Nov 17, 2023 at 7:18 AM Mario Loffredo
wrote:
>
> [ML] Per what is stated in RFC 9083 Section 4.1, a pure request extension
> doesn't have to be included in the rdapConformance array of the related
> response when it is used in a query because the rdapConformance
Sorry. Forgot to reply to the mailing list.
Thanks Andy for the heads up.
Best,
Mario
Messaggio Inoltrato
Oggetto: Re: [regext] ACTION REQUESTED: split
draft-ietf-regext-rdap-jscontact
Data: Fri, 17 Nov 2023 10:25:37 +0100
Mittente: Mario Loffredo
A: Andrew
