Re: [regext] EXTENDED 2nd WG LAST CALL: draft-ietf-regext-rfc7483bis

2021-01-11 Thread Antoin Verschuren
ign@dmarc.ietf.org>; i...@antoin.nl > <mailto:i...@antoin.nl>; regext@ietf.org <mailto:regext@ietf.org> > Subject: Re: [regext] EXTENDED 2nd WG LAST CALL: draft-ietf-regext-rfc7483bis > > Notice: This email is from an external sender. > > > Support…

Re: [regext] EXTENDED 2nd WG LAST CALL: draft-ietf-regext-rfc7483bis

2021-01-08 Thread Jody Kolker
Nope – Support for 7483bis also. From: regext On Behalf Of Wilhelm, Richard Sent: Friday, January 8, 2021 7:54 AM To: shollenbeck=40verisign@dmarc.ietf.org; i...@antoin.nl; regext@ietf.org Subject: Re: [regext] EXTENDED 2nd WG LAST CALL: draft-ietf-regext-rfc7483bis Notice: This email is

Re: [regext] EXTENDED 2nd WG LAST CALL: draft-ietf-regext-rfc7483bis

2021-01-08 Thread Wilhelm, Richard
Support… sorry for late reply From: regext on behalf of "Hollenbeck, Scott" Date: Thursday, January 7, 2021 at 7:50 AM To: Antoin Verschuren , "regext@ietf.org" Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [regext] EXTENDED 2nd WG LAST CALL: draft-ietf-regext-rfc7483bis Caution: This e

Re: [regext] EXTENDED 2nd WG LAST CALL: draft-ietf-regext-rfc7483bis

2021-01-07 Thread Hollenbeck, Scott
Verschuren Sent: Monday, January 4, 2021 10:00 AM To: regext@ietf.org Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [regext] EXTENDED 2nd WG LAST CALL: draft-ietf-regext-rfc7483bis Caution: This email originated from outside the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the

Re: [regext] EXTENDED 2nd WG LAST CALL: draft-ietf-regext-rfc7483bis

2021-01-04 Thread Antoin Verschuren
Dear WG, WGLC for this document officially ended last night. Unfortunately we didn’t get enough support (+5) to declare overwhelming consensus for elevation. The chairs have decided to give you all another week and extend this WGLC till Sunday 10 Januari 2021. This document is suggested to be