Klaus,
The EAI address issue applies to more than RFC 5733 (RFC 8543 and Email
Forwarding Mapping at a minimum) , where even if creating a new version of RFC
5733 made sense, it would not solve the broader issue. The EPP extension
option would be straight forward and can be applied across mult
> On 20 Nov 2020, at 19:32, Klaus Malorny wrote:
>
> On 20.11.20 14:37, Taras Heichenko wrote:
>>> Right - it's a lot MORE work.
>> Let's ask Klaus what takes more developer's work, changing namespace, or
>> adding the extension generation and parsing.
>> (In the neighbor thread Klaus wrote t
On 20.11.20 14:37, Taras Heichenko wrote:
Right - it's a lot MORE work.
Let's ask Klaus what takes more developer's work, changing namespace, or adding
the extension generation and parsing.
(In the neighbor thread Klaus wrote that his company is developing EPP
software.)
Hi,
well, for t
> On 20 Nov 2020, at 13:18, Hollenbeck, Scott
> wrote:
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Taras Heichenko
>> Sent: Friday, November 20, 2020 5:49 AM
>> To: Hollenbeck, Scott
>> Cc: regext@ietf.org
>> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [rege
> -Original Message-
> From: Taras Heichenko
> Sent: Friday, November 20, 2020 5:49 AM
> To: Hollenbeck, Scott
> Cc: regext@ietf.org
> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [regext] EAI in EPP from a registrar point of view
>
> Caution: This email originated from outside the or
> On 20 Nov 2020, at 07:04, Hollenbeck, Scott wrote:
>
[skip]
>> Let's compare the pros and contras of both
>> (1)
>> + allows implementation by minimum changes in the software. It is enough
>> to change the rule which checks email addresses.
>
> I disagree with this completely. A new versi
lf of Hollenbeck, Scott"
wrote:
> -Original Message-
> From: regext On Behalf Of Taras Heichenko
> Sent: Thursday, November 19, 2020 1:47 PM
> To: regext@ietf.org
> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [regext] EAI in EPP from a registrar point of view
&g
> -Original Message-
> From: regext On Behalf Of Taras Heichenko
> Sent: Thursday, November 19, 2020 1:47 PM
> To: regext@ietf.org
> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [regext] EAI in EPP from a registrar point of view
>
> Caution: This email originated from outside the organ
l the more so I heard there are registries that already do this
way).
> On 19 Nov 2020, at 15:47, Hollenbeck, Scott
> wrote:
>
> From: regext On Behalf Of Dmitry Belyavsky
> Sent: Thursday, November 19, 2020 4:03 AM
> To: regext@ietf.org
> Subject: [EXTERNAL] [rege
From: regext On Behalf Of Dmitry Belyavsky
Sent: Thursday, November 19, 2020 4:03 AM
To: regext@ietf.org
Subject: [EXTERNAL] [regext] EAI in EPP from a registrar point of view
Caution: This email originated from outside the organization. Do not click
links or open attachments unless you
Hello,
I think it's worth providing some thoughts about the EAI support in EPP
from a registrar's perspective.
>From a registrar's perspective, when the registry provides some feature,
the registrar has to support it in most cases. When a registry supports
EAI, the registrar should be ready to at
11 matches
Mail list logo
