Re: [regext] About conformance to RFC 8521

On Tue, Nov 29, 2022 at 09:06:03AM -0500, Andrew Newton wrote: > On Mon, Nov 28, 2022 at 12:56:57PM +, Hollenbeck, Scott wrote: >> On Wed, Nov 23, 2022 at 04:02:35PM +0100, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: >>> While RFC 8521 says "RDAP responses that contain values described >>> in this document MUST

Re: [regext] About conformance to RFC 8521

To: regext@ietf.org > > Cc: bortzme...@nic.fr > > Subject: [EXTERNAL] [regext] About conformance to RFC 8521 > > > > Caution: This email originated from outside the organization. Do not click > > links > > or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and

Re: [regext] About conformance to RFC 8521

> -Original Message- > From: regext On Behalf Of Stephane Bortzmeyer > Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2022 10:03 AM > To: regext@ietf.org > Cc: bortzme...@nic.fr > Subject: [EXTERNAL] [regext] About conformance to RFC 8521 > > Caution: This email originated from

[regext] About conformance to RFC 8521

While RFC 8521 says "RDAP responses that contain values described in this document MUST indicate conformance with this specification by including an rdapConformance [RFC7483] value of "rdap_objectTag_level_0", it is funny to note that apparently not one of the registries under