John,
It was my conclusion that no change was needed based on a review of the thread.
Dmitry, the document shepherd (Jody Kolker), and I re-reviewed the thread that
originated with Pete's issue. Pete's issue was associated with a better
explanation for the extra ASCII email address. The dra
--On Tuesday, July 26, 2022 18:37 + "Gould, James"
wrote:
> Pete,
>
> We addressed some of your feedback (Minor issues and
> Nits/editorial comments) in draft-ietf-regext-epp-eai-13 and I
> responded to your Major issues below. Do the updates made in
> draft-ietf-regext-epp-eai-13 and the
Dear John,
First, please apologize me for not participating in the original discussion
On Thu, Jun 2, 2022 at 9:06 AM John C Klensin wrote:
> Pete and James,
>
> Let me add one thing to Pete's (and Yoshiro Yoneya's)
> comments/concerns. I tried to raise this earlier, but obviously
> did not ex
Pete and James,
Let me add one thing to Pete's (and Yoshiro Yoneya's)
comments/concerns. I tried to raise this earlier, but obviously
did not explain it well:
--On Wednesday, June 1, 2022 20:23 + "Gould, James"
wrote:
> Pete,
>
> Thanks for the review and feedback. My responses are emb
