Re: [regext] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7484 (5461)

2018-08-14 Thread Hollenbeck, Scott
.com; wei...@ietf.org > Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [regext] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7484 > (5461) > > Thanks for reporting this. You are right that the intent of the example > was not as written. It should have been as you pointed: > https://example.net/rdap/xn--zckzah > &

Re: [regext] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7484 (5461)

2018-08-14 Thread Marc Blanchet
Thanks for reporting this. You are right that the intent of the example was not as written. It should have been as you pointed: https://example.net/rdap/xn--zckzah So I would agree with the proposed change. Regards, Marc. On 14 Aug 2018, at 8:14, RFC Errata System wrote: The following errata

[regext] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7484 (5461)

2018-08-14 Thread RFC Errata System
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC7484, "Finding the Authoritative Registration Data (RDAP) Service". -- You may review the report below and at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5461 -- Type: Editorial