a11-2-20120405/datatypes.html#QName>
> simple type, which are expanded names
> <https://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-xml-names11-20040204/#dt-expname> with a
> [Definition:] *local name* and a [Definition:] *namespace name*.
>
>
>
> There are many examples in https://www.w3.org/TR/xml
On Jan 20, 2025 at 7:41:11 AM, "Hollenbeck, Scott"
wrote:
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Tim Bray
>
Thank you for the review. In your note, is the concern that the namespace
> prefix is being used for the element name (e.g., “addlEmail”)? I found
> similar definitions in
On Jan 17, 2025 at 6:22:32 AM, "Gould, James" wrote:
> Tim,
>
>
>
> Thank you for the review. In your note, is the concern that the namespace
> prefix is being used for the element name (e.g., “addlEmail”)? I found
> similar definitions in the following EPP RFCs, which are broadly
> implemented
, worth raising a flag over. -Tim
On Jan 15, 2025 at 4:52:56 PM, David Dong via RT <
drafts-expert-review-comm...@iana.org> wrote:
> Dear Tim Bray, Martin Thomson (cc: regext WG),
>
> As the designated experts for the IETF XML Registry registry, can you
> review the propose
Nov 08 20:25:58 2024, david.dong wrote:
>
> Dear Tim Bray, Martin Thomson (cc: regext WG),
>
>
> As the designated experts for the ns and schema registries, can you
>
> review the proposed registrations in draft-ietf-regext-epp-ttl-10 for
>
> us? Please see
>
>
> htt
This looks fine to me. In section 2.1.1.2, should the 2nd example have “S”
in the left column?
On Jul 30, 2024 at 3:03:22 PM, David Dong via RT <
drafts-expert-review-comm...@iana.org> wrote:
> Hi Martin Thomson, Tim Bray,
>
> As the designated expert for the XML ns and schema
I see nits in this draft:
Section 2 says “A newer version of the extension is expected to use an XML
namespace with a higher version number than the prior versions” but I can't
find anything defining what they mean by "namespace version number". Maybe
I just missed it? Maybe this would be obvious
I'm sorry but I think this sentence
"maint" is used as an abbreviation for
"urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:epp:maintenance-1.0".
is misleading - it is used as, and only as, an example XML namespace
prefix, mapped to the URN. Which is just fine. It's not a general-purpose
abbreviation in this document. T
