In reviewing the IANA registrations for this draft, I noticed a design issue
that I think the working group needs to discuss more.
>From a strictly schema perspective, the whitespace normalization requirements
>for token will likely have implications for usability of passwords that
>include spa
On Sun, Nov 4, 2018 at 6:49 PM Gould, James wrote:
> The scoping of the namespace for changepoll does have a negative impact,
Hi James,
Can you substantiate this claim? Understand that I am not familiar
with the work here.
___
regext mailing list
reg
Folks,
I'm seeing an increase in EPP registrations for the XML namespace and
schema registries.
In the past, the names this group have selected are quite generic.
I would like to request that this group include a label in the names
that it uses. Other users of these registries carefully scope t
Already done.
On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 5:11 AM Adam Roach wrote:
>
> Thanks, Martin. Can you follow up with IANA to let them know that your
> concerns have been satisfied?
>
> /a
>
> On 10/30/18 4:54 AM, Martin Thomson wrote:
> > Thanks Linlin, that helps. If these are
___
> Linlin Zhou
>
>
> From: Martin Thomson
> Date: 2018-10-26 05:09
> To: regext
> Subject: [regext] draft-ietf-regext-org extensibility comments
> Hi,
>
> I was asked to review draft-ietf-regext-org for the XML namespace and
> schema registries. Everything looks fine
Hi,
I was asked to review draft-ietf-regext-org for the XML namespace and
schema registries. Everything looks fine, except that I think we got
crossed wires somewhere in the back and forth.
The comment I made was that certain types use xs:enumeration with a
set of values. Here I refer to epp-or
