[regext] Re: Extensions: Clarify search results naming #41

Hi Jasdip, Tom, On 03.01.25 22:41, Jasdip Singh wrote: https://github.com/anewton1998/draft-regext-rdap-extensions/issues/41 >> Section 2.4.4, paragraph 1 >> As described in [RFC9082] and Section 2.3, an extension may define new paths in URLs.  If the extension describes the behavior of an R

[regext] Re: Extensions: Referrals handling #56

Hi Jasdip, On 03.01.25 22:59, Jasdip Singh wrote: https://github.com/anewton1998/draft-regext-rdap-extensions/issues/56 >> Section 4.2, paragraph 3 >> Extensions MUST explicitly define any required behavioral changes to the processing of referrals.  If an extension does not make any provisi

[regext] Re: some feedback on draft-ietf-regext-rdap-versioning

Hi, Inline 2 comments on problem to solve and query params vs. headers. On Mon, Nov 18, 2024 at 1:14 PM Gould, James > wrote: 2. In section 1, the sentence on RDAP conformance values is misleading. I propose: OLD: The RDAP Conformance values are identifiers with

[regext] Re: RDAP versioning - on client-server interactions and 2-RTT flow

Hi Mario, On 23.11.24 13:57, Mario Loffredo wrote: Hi Andy, see my responses below. Il 22/11/2024 21:08, Andrew Newton (andy) ha scritto: below... On Fri, Nov 22, 2024 at 5:00 AM Mario Loffredo wrote: Can you please elaborate on which use case corresponds to support a default version tha