Hi Orie,
This errata affects the Registry Maintenance Notification EPP Mapping Schema
(https://www.iana.org/assignments/xml-registry/schema/epp/maintenance-1.0.xsd);
do you want us to update the .xsd file and add this errata as an additional
reference to "epp:maintenance-1.0" in
https://www.ia
Paul Wouters has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-regext-epp-ttl-17: Yes
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refer to
https://ww
Hi Deb, my response is below.
> On 16 Dec 2024, at 12:16, Deb Cooley via Datatracker wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
> I have one easy comment:
>
> Section 1.2.1, second paragraph: The 'may' here is difficult to interpret
> since
> literally all the values under this paragraph are 'MUST' or 'MUST NOT'.
Hello Gavin
Thanks for your prompt reply (and pruning the useless text in the data tracker
email).
The proposed change for my DISCUSS point will indeed address it, i.e., I am
clearing my DISCUSS ballot as soon as a revised I-D is submitted.
About the ‘for’ attribute, while I understand the WG
Hi Éric, my responses are below.
> On 16 Dec 2024, at 11:21, Éric Vyncke via Datatracker
> wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
> ## DISCUSS (blocking)
>
> As noted in https://www.ietf.org/blog/handling-iesg-ballot-positions/, a
> DISCUSS ballot is just a request to have a discussion on the following topics:
Hi Roman, my responses are below.
> On 14 Dec 2024, at 14:42, Roman Danyliw via Datatracker
> wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
> ** Section 1.2.1
> 2. If the value of the "for" attribute is "custom", then the
>element MUST also have a "custom" attribute containing
> a DNS record type confo
