Nope. RDAP is intrinsically tied to HTTP.
-andy
On Thu, Nov 9, 2023 at 6:00 PM Rubens Kuhl
wrote:
>
>
> I was reviewing a documentation that mentioned RDAP over DTLS… was that ever
> defined ? I always thought of RDAP thru TCP-based TLS and remember ideas of
> using RDAP over QUIC, but DTLS wa
I was reviewing a documentation that mentioned RDAP over DTLS… was that ever
defined ? I always thought of RDAP thru TCP-based TLS and remember ideas of
using RDAP over QUIC, but DTLS was not a transport I’ve heard of being used
with RDAP.
If defined, is it a SHOULD or a MUST ?
Rubens
si
Jasdip & Tom,
After the IETF-118 REGEXT meeting, I found this message that I never replied
to. I believe that draft-ietf-regext-rdap-rir-search needs to fully follow the
extension identifier as a prefix rule defined in RFC 7480, RFC 9082, and RFC
9083. I don’t support the concept of two class
Paul Wouters has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-regext-rdap-redacted-15: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refer
