[regext] John Scudder's Discuss on draft-ietf-regext-rdap-reverse-search-24: (with DISCUSS)

2023-08-22 Thread John Scudder via Datatracker
John Scudder has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-regext-rdap-reverse-search-24: Discuss When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refe

Re: [regext] [IANA #1279352] expert review for draft-ietf-regext-rdap-openid (rdap-extensions)

2023-08-22 Thread Andrew Newton
David, This looks good to me. -andy On Tue, Aug 22, 2023 at 3:53 PM David Dong via RT wrote: > > Dear Andy and Scott (cc: regext WG), > > As the designated experts for the RDAP Extensions registry, can you review > the proposed registration in draft-ietf-regext-rdap-openid-24 for us? Please >

[regext] [IANA #1279353] expert review for draft-ietf-regext-rdap-openid (jwt)

2023-08-22 Thread David Dong via RT
Dear John, Brian, and Michael (cc: regext WG), As the designated experts for the JSON Web Token Claims registry, can you review the proposed registration in draft-ietf-regext-rdap-openid-24 for us? Please see: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-rdap-openid/ The due date is Sept

Re: [regext] [IANA #1279352] expert review for draft-ietf-regext-rdap-openid (rdap-extensions)

2023-08-22 Thread Hollenbeck, Scott
I'm the author of the draft in question. I need to recuse myself and ask Andy to complete the review request. Scott > -Original Message- > From: David Dong via RT > Sent: Tuesday, August 22, 2023 3:53 PM > Cc: a...@hxr.us; Hollenbeck, Scott ; > regext@ietf.org > Subject: [EXTERNAL] [IAN

[regext] [IANA #1279352] expert review for draft-ietf-regext-rdap-openid (rdap-extensions)

2023-08-22 Thread David Dong via RT
Dear Andy and Scott (cc: regext WG), As the designated experts for the RDAP Extensions registry, can you review the proposed registration in draft-ietf-regext-rdap-openid-24 for us? Please see: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-rdap-openid/ The due date is September 5th. If th

[regext] Roman Danyliw's Discuss on draft-ietf-regext-rdap-reverse-search-24: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

2023-08-22 Thread Roman Danyliw via Datatracker
Roman Danyliw has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-regext-rdap-reverse-search-24: Discuss When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please ref

Re: [regext] [Last-Call] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-regext-rdap-reverse-search-24

2023-08-22 Thread Andrew Newton
On Tue, Aug 22, 2023 at 4:54 AM Mario Loffredo wrote: > > [ML] Firstly, would say at the outset that the authors and the WG have never > thought of this feature as uncontrolled whereas it is based on the use of > sensitive information. > > But, if on one side there are the privacy concerns to co

Re: [regext] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-regext-rdap-reverse-search-24

2023-08-22 Thread Mario Loffredo
Hi Susan, thanks for the additional feedback. Again my comments below. Il 22/08/2023 15:19, Susan Hares ha scritto: Mario: Thank you for your response. You are correct.  My editorial #3 should be: New: /However, the core RDAP specifications already define search queries with similar proce

Re: [regext] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-regext-rdap-reverse-search-24

2023-08-22 Thread Susan Hares
Mario: Thank you for your response. You are correct. My editorial #3 should be: New: /However, the core RDAP specifications already define search queries with similar processing requirements so the basis of this objection is not clear./ I noticed that the OPS-DIR review indicated operational

Re: [regext] Lars Eggert's Discuss on draft-ietf-regext-rdap-reverse-search-24: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

2023-08-22 Thread Mario Loffredo
Hi Lars, thanks a lot for your review. Please find my comments inline. Il 22/08/2023 12:48, Lars Eggert via Datatracker ha scritto: Lars Eggert has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-regext-rdap-reverse-search-24: Discuss When responding, please keep the subject line intact

Re: [regext] [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-regext-rdap-reverse-search-24

2023-08-22 Thread Lars Eggert
Susan, thank you for your review. I have entered a Discuss ballot for this document. Lars > On Aug 21, 2023, at 23:14, Susan Hares via Datatracker > wrote: > > Reviewer: Susan Hares > Review result: Ready with Nits > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Re

[regext] Lars Eggert's Discuss on draft-ietf-regext-rdap-reverse-search-24: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

2023-08-22 Thread Lars Eggert via Datatracker
Lars Eggert has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-regext-rdap-reverse-search-24: Discuss When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer

Re: [regext] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-regext-rdap-reverse-search-24

2023-08-22 Thread Mario Loffredo
Hi Susan, thanks a lot for your review. Please find my comments inline. Il 21/08/2023 22:14, Susan Hares via Datatracker ha scritto: Reviewer: Susan Hares Review result: Ready with Nits I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF

Re: [regext] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-regext-rdap-reverse-search-24

2023-08-22 Thread Mario Loffredo
Hi Tim, thanks a lot for your review. Please find my comments inline. Il 21/08/2023 20:27, Tim Chown via Datatracker ha scritto: Reviewer: Tim Chown Review result: Not Ready Hi, I have reviewed this document as part of the Operational directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents