Hi Mario,
On Thu, Apr 21, 2022 at 04:51:15PM +0200, Mario Loffredo wrote:
> thinking back to my last message, I need some clarifications before
> updating the document.
>
> Please find my comments inline.
>
> Il 18/04/2022 13:10, Tom Harrison ha scritto:
>> - I-D.ietf-calext-jscontact is liste
On 21.04.22 17:34, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
On 21 April 2022 16:35:25 CEST, "Gould, James"
wrote:
+1 on the use 2103/"Unimplemented extension". This is a broader topic with the
passing invalid or conflicting extensions (e.g., restore request extension of update
along with the sync ex
On 21 April 2022 16:35:25 CEST, "Gould, James"
wrote:
>+1 on the use 2103/"Unimplemented extension". This is a broader topic with
>the passing invalid or conflicting extensions (e.g., restore request extension
>of update along with the sync extension).
>
2103 would suggest that the extensio
Hi Tom,
thinking back to my last message, I need some clarifications before
updating the document.
Please find my comments inline.
Il 18/04/2022 13:10, Tom Harrison ha scritto:
On Mon, Apr 04, 2022 at 03:18:33PM +0200, Antoin Verschuren wrote:
Dear Working Group,
The authors of the followi
+1 on the use 2103/"Unimplemented extension". This is a broader topic with the
passing invalid or conflicting extensions (e.g., restore request extension of
update along with the sync extension).
--
JG
James Gould
Fellow Engineer
jgo...@verisign.com
703-948-3271
12061 Bluemont Way
Re
On 21.04.22 11:09, Martin Casanova wrote:
Hello
I was stumbling over a rather theoretical problem and I was hoping to
get some feedback from the group.
Given a with a instead of a
extension what would be the correct answer ?
Precondition: The domain would not yet exist and therefore als
Hello
I was stumbling over a rather theoretical problem and I was hoping to
get some feedback from the group.
Given a with a instead of a
extension what would be the correct answer ?
Precondition: The domain would not yet exist and therefore also no
dnssec data is present at the registr
