[regext] Erik Kline's Discuss on draft-ietf-regext-rdap-partial-response-13: (with DISCUSS)

2020-09-05 Thread Erik Kline via Datatracker
Erik Kline has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-regext-rdap-partial-response-13: Discuss When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refe

Re: [regext] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-regext-rdap-partial-response-13: (with COMMENT)

2020-09-05 Thread Barry Leiba
> > ** Editorial: > > -- Section 1. Editorial. s/fewer data/less data/ > > [ML] I was suggested by a mother tongue to replace "less data" with > "fewer data" before WGLC . After a further check on the web, it seems > that "less" fits better for massive data. Indeed. The rule is that we use "fe

Re: [regext] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-regext-rdap-partial-response-13: (with COMMENT)

2020-09-05 Thread Mario Loffredo
Hi Roman, thanks a lot for your review. Plase find my comments inline. Il 04/09/2020 23:13, Roman Danyliw via Datatracker ha scritto: Roman Danyliw has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-regext-rdap-partial-response-13: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject li

Re: [regext] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-regext-rdap-partial-response-13: (with COMMENT)

2020-09-05 Thread Mario Loffredo
Hi Eric, thanks a lot for your review. Please find my comments inline. Il 04/09/2020 18:19, Éric Vyncke via Datatracker ha scritto: Éric Vyncke has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-regext-rdap-partial-response-13: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line i