Re: [regext] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-regext-org-ext-09: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

2018-11-12 Thread Linlin Zhou
Hi Benjamin, Sorry that I forgot your email is text/plain. Since we'v e already define "one or more elements" in each , and element. So the following text seems a little duplicated and will be removed. I add the text strikethrough and you may not find that. The , and elements contain the f

Re: [regext] Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-ietf-regext-org-11: (with COMMENT)

2018-11-12 Thread Linlin Zhou
Hin Benjamin, Thanks for your text. It looks good. Regards, Linlin Linlin Zhou From: Benjamin Kaduk Date: 2018-11-13 03:40 To: Linlin Zhou CC: regext-chairs; Pieter Vandepitte; iesg; regext; draft-ietf-regext-org Subject: Re: [regext] Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-ietf-regext-org-11:

Re: [regext] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-regext-org-ext-09: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

2018-11-12 Thread Benjamin Kaduk
Hi Linlin, On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 11:15:24AM +0800, Linlin Zhou wrote: > Dear Benjamin, > James provided his suggestions and I'd like to include them in the updated > text. I think this is the last issue we have and please see if these changes > workable for you. I think this looks good, thank

Re: [regext] Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-ietf-regext-org-11: (with COMMENT)

2018-11-12 Thread Benjamin Kaduk
Hi Linlin, On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 09:11:59AM +0800, Linlin Zhou wrote: > Dear Benjamin, > I have confirmed with others about this wording. Your understanding is right > that "service message" means using the mechanism. So I suggest > changing the text in section 4.3 like, > The server operator