Martin,
Thanks for posting the flashback with the statements from the IETF-102 session.
I provide my feedback to the statements embedded below.
Jim and Antoin, I would like 10 minutes at the REGEXT meeting at IETF-103 to
introduce and discuss the newly published
draft-gould-casanova-regext-un
Hello Martin,
On 10/17/18 17:50, Martin Casanova wrote:
> I would like to comment 4 statements(analogous) that were made in this
> session:
Overall, I agree that all four statements are problematic at best
(details inline below).
> 1. To make sure the server remains RFC compliant when sending p
Hello
I was viewing the discussions about the unhandled namespaces in the last
IETF meeting (102 in Montreal) again to reflect a bit more on the topic.
starting at minute 46:46
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qTJsVCM5Bmo
starting at minute 38:40
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2g44uJWtB2M
I
