A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Registration Protocols Extensions WG of the
IETF.
Title : Verification Code Extension for the Extensible
Provisioning Protocol (EPP)
Author : James
From: Pieter Vandepitte [mailto:pieter.vandepi...@dnsbelgium.be]
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2018 9:40 AM
To: Hollenbeck, Scott
Cc: regext@ietf.org
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [regext] WGLC: draft-ietf-regext-rdap-object-tag
(1) I think the solution is just not right. It's a quick and dirty way of
Patrick,
You are right and I share your surprise and doubts, about both update and
transfer. update has been removed, transfer is still in the draft.
This should not come as a surprise to anyone since it has been discussed on the
list and there was no request or agreement to remove it. The
Patrick,
On Fri, Apr 13, 2018, at 15:09, Gould, James wrote:
> I made the proposal for the optional "standard" attribute with the list
> message
>
(https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/regext/7E6X5xCdt3DhqL7p7CFupm9bAAY/?qid=e4f712bc8e70e4d0a458971928924651)
> on the thre
Patrick,
Thanks for your thoughts of the 4 options presented for handling the returning
of a poll message that the client does not support based on the client login
services. To note, this is not specific to draft-ietf-regext-change-poll, so
it is an important topic for defining a generic so
Thanks Linlin!
Seems OK for me
> Zero or more OPTIONAL org:status elements
Optional here is not necessary, since it's zero, imo, but maybe sometimes you
can't be explicit enough i think ;-)
Kind regards
Pieter
> On 16 Apr 2018, at 11:52, Linlin Zhou wrote:
>
> Dear Pieter,
> Thanks for y
>
> (1) I think the solution is just not right. It's a quick and dirty way of
> doing these things. The right way imo is defining a new RDAP extension (with
> a dedicated attribute to identify the authoritative source)
> (2) In my opinion there are other, existing, mechanisms for discovering
>
FYI, folks.
Scott
From: regops [mailto:regops-boun...@nlnetlabs.nl] On Behalf Of Nicoleta Munteanu
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2018 1:03 AM
To: reg...@nlnetlabs.nl
Subject: [EXTERNAL] [Regops] ROW#7: May 17th, 2018 - Vancouver, Canada
Dear Colleagues,
The next Registration Operations Workshop
From: regext [mailto:regext-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Pieter Vandepitte
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2018 2:58 AM
To: regext@ietf.org
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [regext] WGLC: draft-ietf-regext-rdap-object-tag
Hi, my 2 cents:
(1) I think the solution is just not right. It's a quick and dirty way
Dear Pieter,
Thanks for your support. I'll update the text according to your comments.
Please see some my feedbacks inline.
Regards,
Linlin
zhoulin...@cnnic.cn
From: Pieter Vandepitte
Date: 2018-04-13 22:06
To: James Galvin
CC: Registration Protocols Extensions
Subject: Re: [regext] WGLC: dra
I support it.
Regards
Mario
Il 13/04/2018 15:10, James Galvin ha scritto:
Thanks to James Gould for volunteering to be document shepherd!
Please folks, as Scott says, respond to this message and indicate your
support or at least no objection.
Thanks!
Antoin and Jim
On 6 Apr 2018, at 9:
11 matches
Mail list logo
