Thomas,
Use of the phase and sub-phase as a mechanism for clients to indicate fee or
domain grouping categories was not the intent in draft-ietf-regext-launchphase.
At the IETF-98 REGEXT WG meeting it was unclear when there would be
overlapping launch phases. The launch phase and sub-phase i
Thanks Thomas.
Comments below - JWK.
Thanks,
Jody Kolker
-Original Message-
From: Thomas Corte [mailto:thomas.co...@knipp.de]
Sent: Monday, August 07, 2017 11:46 AM
To: Jody Kolker ; Gould, James ;
regext@ietf.org
Cc: supp...@tango-rs.com
Subject: Re: [regext] TLD Phase Discovery
He
Good Morning,
Thomas, I think the Fee draft can handle your use case of using launch phase
for premium names (a premium string is only available in one phase/subphase
combination so if client does not pass phase you should return that one valid
combination). Can you provide examples where it
Good Morning,
To me it seems:
1. That this is somewhat of a corner case.
2. I don't think the current draft of launchphase addresses the issue Thomas is
expressing.
3. I don't think there is a need to modify launchphase for this functionality.
Sending a separate note to discuss Thomas' is
Hello Jody,
On 07/08/2017 18:27, Jody Kolker wrote:
> In this paragraph, it sounds like the domain:create command does not need a
> fee to be sent into create the premium domain. It only needs the correct
> phase? Is that correct?
Yes, requiring registrars to specify the correct phase was ex
Hello Jody,
On 07/08/2017 18:25, Jody Kolker wrote:
> Hi Thomas,
>
> Are the premium names only available in the General Availability phase or are
> they available in Landrush or any other early access phases?
One of our TLDs offered premium names during the "claims" phase, which
was essential
Sorry for the spread out questions.
Thomas - In your implementation, is the premium phase specified in the "phase"
attribute or in the "subphase" attribute?
Thanks,
Jody Kolker
-Original Message-
From: regext [mailto:regext-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Corte
Sent: Monday, Aug
Also -
<<
In our use case, we simply modeled the concept of "premium" domain names around
launch phases. For each category of premium domain names, a launch phase exists
in which only the names from the category are available.
So here it's strictly policy (i.e., the lists or premium names in eac
Hi Thomas,
Are the premium names only available in the General Availability phase or are
they available in Landrush or any other early access phases?
Thanks,
Jody Kolker
-Original Message-
From: regext [mailto:regext-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Corte
Sent: Monday, August 07,
James,
On 07/08/2017 17:18, Gould, James wrote:
> Thomas,
>
> My feedback is provided below with a “JG-“ prefix.
>
> From a high level, we need other registries and registrars to weigh in on
> this topic to answer the following:
> ...
I can see the reasoning behind this outreach, though p
Thomas,
My feedback is provided below with a “JG-“ prefix.
From a high level, we need other registries and registrars to weigh in on this
topic to answer the following:
1. Is phase-dependent availability (e.g., domain available only in specific
launch phases) a corner case?
2. Does the ex
James,
On 04/08/2017 16:58, Gould, James wrote:
> Thomas,
>
> I believe the domain-level availability based on launch phases is a
> corner case that as you point out is currently supported by the
> Availability Check Form in draft-ietf-regext-launchphase. Providing
> trial-and-error probing is
12 matches
Mail list logo
