Re: [regext] Stephen Farrell's Discuss on draft-ietf-eppext-keyrelay-12: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Hi, > On Nov 16, 2016, at 4:02 PM, Ulrich Wisser wrote: > > Hi! > > Yesterday at the DNSOP meeting some IPR issues came up. > At that meeting the AD and IAB told us explicitly that we can not discuss the > IPR. > Today I had a short talk with Andrew Sullivan about the IPR and he confirmed > th

[regext] Clarify on RFC 5731

Greetings from Seoul! At one of the last Centr meetings we came up with a clarifying question about the domain:info response. Today many implementations use the domain:authInfo as a token for domain transfer. That makes domain:authInfo really sensitive. Basically it puts it in the same class as p

Re: [regext] Stephen Farrell's Discuss on draft-ietf-eppext-keyrelay-12: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Hi! Yesterday at the DNSOP meeting some IPR issues came up. At that meeting the AD and IAB told us explicitly that we can not discuss the IPR. Today I had a short talk with Andrew Sullivan about the IPR and he confirmed that we are not supposed to discuss the IPR. The IPR is only meant to allow us