All,
Thx Ulrich for bringing this to the mailing list. I have sent a lengthy email
to WG-chairs and ADs on this issue but this mail sums it up quite easily. This
is my understanding:
I have re-read BCP-79 on the train home from IETF and I have to agree with
Scott that the IPR-disclosure on the
Hi all,
BCP 79 only requires the IPR declaration and some information on the
licensing policy.
No concrete license fees or policy is required. In it's IPR Verisign has
agreed to apply one of the following options
- a) No License Required for Implementers
- b) Royalty-Free, Reasonable and No
