Now, I understand your joy but was it really necessary to send
this nice digest to all of us ?
- Original Message -
From: Szemerédy Gábor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2001 8:55 PM
Subject: Re:Apache&php
> Thanks a lot!
> It works now, after analyz
Wednesday, April 25, 2001, 11:15:38 AM, Mike Harris wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Apr 2001, Ben Ocean wrote:
>>>All the time? Or just at certain times?
>>
>>Dunno for the slocate problem. When the problem was in logrotate.status
>>(presumably before it got to slocate) it ran for *hours* then crashed.
>>
Wednesday, April 25, 2001, 11:55:07 AM, Mike A. Harris wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Apr 2001, J.Akhramovich wrote:
>>Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2001 11:42:29 +0300
>>From: J.Akhramovich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>>List-Id: General Red Hat discussion
Wednesday, April 25, 2001, 9:01:10 PM, Brian Wright wrote:
> I was able to d/l it last night as well. Interesting... the Slashdot effect
> wasn't apparent. :-)
> I'm VERY impressed with it, and I'm hoping that the next GTK+ will have
> anti-alias support. I was hoping that Gnome 1.4 would use
Wednesday, April 25, 2001, 8:57:43 PM, Michael R. Jinks wrote:
> Questions for Warren: what were you using before this? If a previous
> GNOME, has the layout really changed significantly? Or were you using a
> non-GNOME desktop?
> And, is Linuxconf really going away? Never used it much mysel
Thursday, April 26, 2001, 2:33:12 AM, Brian Wright wrote:
> This is where I get a bit confused. I see that Qt-2.3.0 supports font
> anti-aliasing and KDE uses it, but it seems GNOME has to wait for mods to GTK+.
> Would it be possible to take advantage of Xrender without modifiying the GTK+
>
HUH?! Don't mean to be rude, but do send mail to this list if
your OS gives ya head akes else, don't send mail. On the other
hand this is the coolest "Test" message I've ever seen on this
list.
- Original Message -
From: Alireza Saleh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: red <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent:
Friday, May 04, 2001, 2:04:19 AM, Zoki wrote:
[cut]
...
[cut]
Zoki, please oh please, take off those HTML tags.
--
If Bill Gates had a dime for every time a Windows box crashed...
...,Oh wait, he already does.
___
Friday, May 04, 2001, 2:04:18 AM, Zoki wrote:
>
> At 13:45 10/04/01 -0500, you wrote:
> > i have a dual boot box with NT and linux
>fine. MBR is
> > controlled by NT. TO boot to linux i boot from floppy.
> > however i have damaged my floppy.
> > is there a way i can boot into linux ?? (other t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
1 Jan 2002 at 01:39:04 ,
K Old wrote the following
on the "Problems getting RH 7.2 to boot properly" thread:
> All equipment is brand new and has been exchanged a few times cause certain
> components weren't working right, but now everything seems ok
hould. I mean it installed on my 4 year ol P90 machine. Be sure
you have at least 16MB of RAM, if you want X windows then 32, 40, 64 would
be nice.
--
Silviu Cojocaru
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
__
It's a naive, domestic ope
Is there any console app that acts like an addressbook? So far I didn't
have any luck in finding one. I use RHL 7.0, stock install.
--
Silviu Cojocaru
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
__
Whenever a system becomes completely de
Oh NO! Not this one again!!
sheesh!
--
Silviu Cojocaru
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
__
I've noticed several design suggestions in your
o something as "untargz
". You put this alias in .bashrc The line you put there is this
alias untargz="tar -xzvf"
As for that thing of typing the name of the package, bash has
autocompletion. You type some part of the name and then hit [Tab].
Cheers!
--
Silviu Cojocaru
[EM
t come back complaining that they cant unsubscribe to this or any other
> list, when the means to do it are right there.
>
>
>
> Maybe I will write a HOWTO on unsubscribing from the redhat-list.
>
> cheers
--
Silviu Cojocaru
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
On Sun, 18 Feb 2001, Ashley M. Kirchner wrote:
> Stop sending HTML messages to the list.
Oh yeah that helps... My good man if the HTML bothers you, filter it out.
That should help.
Have a peaceful life.
--
Microsoft Windows(tm). A thirty-two bit extension and graphical shell to
a sixteen
ank you in advance for any answers.
--
Silviu Cojocaru
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
__
I *knew* I had some reason for not logging you off... If I could just
remember w
I want to make the tarball of dir using "tar" and "bzip2", could someone
tell me how to do that, the tar man page got me totally confused.
Thanks in advance for any help.
--
Silviu Cojocaru
[EMAIL PROTECTED
On Thu, 6 Jan 2000, Justin Zygmont wrote:
> pinstripe was 6.9, I thought I remember a high number of bugs in that,
> even when hedwig(7.0) came out there was a lot of noise about bugs still.
err
7.0==guinness and 6.0==hedwig
--
Silviu Cojocaru
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (new email a
d. The ones supplied with that
distro are 2.4.0-0.26. They need not be changed as you can see...
Cheers!
--
Silviu Cojocaru
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (new email address)
__
The less time planning, the m
d 3.x releases? I think 3.0.3 was the
> first one with a name.
--
Silviu Cojocaru
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (new email address)
__
Standards are crucial. And the best thing about standards is: there are
so
e, ever, something like that on the site ?
--
Silviu Cojocaru
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (new email address)
__
Windows NT Beer: Comes in 32-oz. cans, but you can only buy it by the
truckload. This causes most people to have to go o
On Fri, 2 Mar 2001, VX useless wrote:
> unsuscribe
And what if I refuse huh?!?
LOL, I couldn't resist :)
--
Silviu Cojocaru
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (new email address)
__
A programmer is a person who pass
ubscribed and memory failos)
He can send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
with the "Subject" line:
subscribe passwd address=his_email_address
--
Silviu Cojocaru
[EMAIL
e been having a
> devil of a time but have the idea (source???) that lilo can
> go anywhere in its' newest incarnation. Is this so or do I
> still have the 1024 limit?
>
I'll keep this short: DOH!! the limit never went away.
--
Silviu Cojocaru
attacker is (sadly) a romanian.
Sadly because I'm too and I hate the fact that my homies find such
activity enjoyfull.
Further more. The ISP is Xnet, one of the bigest/best here. You could
contact them and try to resolve the problem. Well at least they will
cancel the guy's account, I
one on Adobe's site. It's free and works great. xpdf
kinda sux rocks. It failed on some pdfs I had :( even the one with that
came with RH 7.0
--
Silviu Cojocaru
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (new email address)
__
Trying to be
7;t help much either :)
>
> Actually, NT has its roots in OS/2. The very essence of the
> kernel is the OS/2 kernel. At least they held on to
> something from their partnership with IBM in the 80s.
If I'm not mistaken, NTFS also derives f
I just got 16 emails on the redhat-watch list sent between the 7th of June
2000 and 31 of May 2000. I wasn't even subscribed then.
I have to ask: What the HELL is going on?!
--
Silviu Cojocaru
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (new email ad
Umm, yeah, and why exactly did you send all the digest to the list ?
--
.-.
| Silviu Cojocaru | [EMAIL PROTECTED
"I think I can fix it."
The systems analyst said, "No, no, I think we should take it
into town and have a specialist look at it."
The programmer said, "OK, but first I think we should get back
in and see if it does it again."
.---
where am I?
.-.
| Silviu Cojocaru | [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
`-'
Powered by
as gimp 1.1.25
--
Usage: fortune -P [] -a [xsz] [Q: [file]] [rKe9] -v6[+] dataspec ... inputdir
.-.
| Silviu Cojocaru | [E
le tape (for larger machines) is not a bad idea
either. If you need some help, give us a call.
-- CommUNIXque 1:1, ASCAR Business Systems
.-----.
| Silviu Cojocaru |
I woke up at 6 AM and as usual I tried to retrieve may e-mail. I ran
fetchmail, at it behaved starngely, I mean fro time to time it was
stalling for about 25 secs, while this, I tried to ping my ISP's server,
at all was OK, but fetchmail still stalled. VERY weird I have to say...
I also had prob
ith Wolverine (the latest Red Hat 7.1
Beta release) but it's risky.
--
Silviu Cojocaru
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
__
The only "intuitive" interface is the nipple. After that, it's all
le
On Thu, 15 Mar 2001, at 16:23 (GMT -0500), Dale Kosan wrote:
> Thanks for replying.Okay, someone said it supports the 2.0 beta, I have the
> preview version on my Redhat cd, do you think the switch desk will work with
> that version? Yes my wife and I have our own accounts.I have not tried
It sh
On Fri, 16 Mar 2001, at 09:51 (GMT -0400), Marcelo Pavez A. wrote:
> Quiu friends:
>
> while i open my address book and i select a address for send a email,
> the address book open the "new message", but it don't show destinatory.
What program whould that be ?
--
\|/ _ \|/
On Fri, 16 Mar 2001, at 08:12 (GMT -0500), Michael George wrote:
> I'm getting the rpm file for webmin... When I click on the link to the page
> on my work machine, I get a "Netscape Download" window and it starts sucking
> the file down. However, when I do it from Netscape at home, it seems to
On Sat, 17 Mar 2001, at 19:58 (GMT -0500), omicron wrote:
> hi
> i installed kernel 2.4.1, and everything is ok, except for...
>
> 1> pppd !
You need ppp-2.4.
--
If Bill Gates had a dime for every time a Windows box crashed...
..., Oh wait, he already does.
On Sat, 17 Mar 2001, at 11:26 (GMT +0100), Tomás García Ferrari wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm having problems with sendmail: it gets frozen from time to time. As far
> as I can dive into this problem, it seems to be frozen with a lot of
> messages in the queue (specially repeating ones)
>
> I have this
On Sat, 17 Mar 2001, at 23:50 (GMT -0600), Nitebirdz wrote:
> As far as I know, you can only run up2date from an X session. Yes, you can
> pass certain options to the command but it will still rely on X to display.
All the above is FALSE. up2date can be run from pure console without a
hitch (yo
On Mon, 19 Mar 2001, at 15:16 (GMT +0200), Tepponen, Mikko wrote:
> What do I need to do in order to get my RedHat 7.0 to function 100 % in
> english?
> Some of error messages and man pages appear in "bullshit" (i.e. "%&#Eo%").
> How am I supposed to figure them out?
> At the same time the KD
On Wed, 21 Mar 2001, at 16:19 (GMT -0500), jack wallen, jr. wrote:
> you can visit it with this page:
>
> http://uptime.netcraft.com/up/graph/
>
> which returns:
>
> The site www.hotmail.com is running Microsoft-IIS/5.0 on Windows 2000.
I have just made an account at hotmail to "testdrive" it,
On Wed, 21 Mar 2001, at 15:30 (GMT -0800), Thornton Prime wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Mar 2001, Chuck Mead wrote:
>
> > Here's what Micro$oft said about the matter themselves:
> >
> > http://www.microsoft.com/ntserver/web/news/msnw/Hotmail.asp
>
> Ouch. That made my side hurt from laughing too much.
>
>
On Thu, 22 Mar 2001, at 17:50 (GMT -0800), Krikofer wrote:
> Yeah, like IBM way back then when they say we never need any more than 640k
> ram.
If I not err, I think that was our friend Bill Gates that said that... He
never said anything about the 8 meg of ram thingy...
--
If Bill Gates h
I just took a look at people.redhat.com/mharris and there is no Pine dir.
Hey Mike what gives ?!
--
If Bill Gates had a dime for every time a Windows box crashed...
..., Oh wait, he already does.
___
Redhat-list mailing li
On Thu, 22 Mar 2001, at 20:51 (GMT -0500), Chuck Mead wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Mar 2001, Silviu Cojocaru blurted out:
>
> SC>
> SC>I just took a look at people.redhat.com/mharris and there is no Pine dir.
> SC>Hey Mike what gives ?!
>
> Well I just looked and there is...
On Fri, 23 Mar 2001, at 11:44 (GMT -0500), [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > http://www.moongroup.com/stories.php?story=01/03/23/5398918
>
> rather than simply sit here and seethe that AOL has blocked non-AOL
> instant messaging, let me make a humble suggestion. anyone
On Fri, 23 Mar 2001, at 21:13 (GMT +0100), NDSoftware wrote:
I believe he was asking _where_ the SRPM was not _what_ the SRPM was...
> It's the source of packages...
>
> Nicolas DEFFAYET, NDSoftware
> http://www.ndsoftware.net - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> France: Tel +33 671887502 - Fax N/A
> UK: Tel +
I just read about the "Lion virus" on ZDNet, the thing that bothered me
were the talkbacks. And I think the fault is in a degree of 80% of the
article's author. He states that bind 8 has the vulnerability, but never
says that the cure was released about 2 months ago. This gave all these
Winbloze
Does anyone know where I can find some documentation regarding SGML ?
The one that comes with the package is good but I need more then that, I
need to know how to make tables and stuff. The links mentioned in the docs
on my HDD seem to be all kinda dead.
--
If Bill Gates had a dime for eve
I'm using fetchmail 5.5.0-3 and I seem to have a problem when retrieving
mail from a POP3 server: the retrieved massges are not deleted from the
server, this made the mailbox on my ISPs server fill up quite fast. The
symptoms that made me think about that were that some friends of mine
complained
On Mon, 26 Mar 2001, at 14:34 (GMT +0300), Silviu Cojocaru wrote:
> I'm using fetchmail 5.5.0-3 and I seem to have a problem when retrieving
> mail from a POP3 server: the retrieved massges are not deleted from the
> server, this made the mailbox on my ISPs server fill up q
I just read on linuxtoday.com that 1.0.x versions of KMail will start
having date showing troubles from... ugh I forgot the exact date.
Will Red Hat release KDE updates for this ?
Because some people still useit (even I when PINE acts dorky)... and RH 7.0
comes with that sick version of KMail, 1
On Mon, 26 Mar 2001, at 21:21 (GMT -0500), Mike Burger wrote:
> You really need to use it with a graphical browser.
>
> On Mon, 26 Mar 2001, doug piper wrote:
>
> > I have been following the threads on webmin and it sounds great but I
> > am at a loss as to how to run the thing. I have installed
On Thu, 29 Mar 2001, at 08:45 (GMT -0800), lee wrote:
>
> i think what happened is i neglected to consider that I must received those
> updates via the new red carpet updater..:(
>
> solved..:)
> lee
Pffft, Red Carpet probs again, figures... use up2date, it better this way.
--
If Bil
On Fri, 30 Mar 2001, at 00:49 (GMT -0600), ABrady wrote:
> Galeon is getting to be workable. Missing a couple of things and still
> some infrequent crashes (for me). Requires Mozilla be installed (another
> memory hog) but, doesn't overload the system with bringing up gobs of
> useless stuff to g
On Fri, 30 Mar 2001, at 00:02 (GMT -0500), Statux wrote:
> > Have you given Opera a try yet? I have been quite pleased with it thus far.
> > You can get at http://www.opera.com
>
> Opera is commercial.
Was.
--
If Bill Gates had a dime for every time a Windows box crashed...
On Sun, 1 Apr 2001, at 11:03 (GMT -0500), [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Dear [EMAIL PROTECTED],
>
> Thank you for your message regarding -- Redhat-list digest, Vol 1 #1410 - 4 msgs
>
> I am currently out of the office. I will be at home assisting my wife
> with out first child until approximately W
Can someone recommend a good firewall utility for RH Linux 7.0. I'm a
newbie where firewalls are concerned, I'm just finishing reading about
ipchains & co.
It wouldn't hurt if the utility came in an rpm pack for RHL 7.0
I'm just trying to go about this firewall business one step at a time...
fi
On Tue, 3 Apr 2001, at 10:54 (GMT -0400), Jeffrey A Schoolcraft wrote:
> The Ximian version of apt is called "Red carpet" it's supposed to handle
> deb's for debian machines and rpm's for redhat machines. Whether this
> will handle the entire system or just gnome related stuff I don't know.
Ugh
On Tue, 3 Apr 2001, at 09:35 (GMT -0500), Andrew D Dixon wrote:
> Hi All,
> I'm used to the debian environment and really like the way that apt
> handles dependancies. I also like the ease of updateing my stystem with
> apt-get upgrade.
>
> I recently was given the task of administering two serv
On Mon, 2 Apr 2001, at 19:51 (GMT -0400), Anthony E . Greene wrote:
> On Mon, 02 Apr 2001 18:07:24 Rodolfo J. Paiz wrote:
> >You didn't mention an OS, but Eudora runs on both Linux and Windows.
>
> You'll need WINE to run Eudora on Linux. I use Balsa instead. Netscape
> Messenger is actually fair
On Tue, 3 Apr 2001, at 21:11 (GMT -0700), Tim wrote:
> > > The Ximian version of apt is called "Red carpet" it's supposed to handle
> > > deb's for debian machines and rpm's for redhat machines. Whether this
> > > will handle the entire system or just gnome related stuff I don't know.
> >
> > Ug
On Wed, 4 Apr 2001, at 11:49 (GMT -0400), Hal Burgiss wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 02:28:08PM -0500, Mitchell Henderson wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I don't know if you could call it new, it's really a combo of
> > everything that we've seen as of late.
>
> Check this out:
>
> =
I think my HDD may be off to some beautiful place in the sky, meanwhile, I
need some data, and everytime I try to access it it gives me some stuff
about not being able to read some inode and then it resets the hdd and so
on, it could go on forever. I want to know how I could get that data back,
a
On Thu, 5 Apr 2001, at 06:20 (GMT -0500), Mike Chambers wrote:
> EMAZING Linux Tip of the Day - KDE Installer Is on the WayGot this in a
> daily email I get and this turned up this morning. Thought I would forward
> the info to see if anyone that hasn't already heard of it might be
> interested.
On Sat, 7 Apr 2001, at 08:50 (GMT -0700), biniam sahlezghi wrote:
> I have a problem
> I can't send mail otside of my domain it says mail
> rejecyed error SMTP 550. But still I am recieving mail
> but not sending from workstation but I can send from
> the server.When I check the nslookup it says
On Sun, 8 Apr 2001, at 01:36 (GMT -0500), Aage J. Skjolingstad wrote:
> I'm impressed ??
>
> About what - RedHat - no; - Mr. Young - I will get many against me
> tonight.
You seem to be your own enemy, you don't need more.
> How can somebody so similar to Bill Gates - (well he is missing some o
On Sun, 8 Apr 2001, at 02:24 (GMT -0500), Aage J. Skjolingstad wrote:
> Dear Silviu,
>
> Thank you - my complete problem is that yes, - I need a rest - special
> from clappers like you -
Hah, we will always be there to mess you up.
> Wake up and be more selective - may be you will find out that
On Sun, 8 Apr 2001, at 02:34 (GMT -0500), Aage J. Skjolingstad wrote:
> Silviu Cojocaru wrote:
>
> > You seem to be your own enemy, you don't need more
>
> Thank you so much for waking me up Portuguese
>
> > Hahaha, and you think your NT moves better than RH, L
I am using RH 7.1. I have configured two dial-up accounts using
the dial-up config tool provided by redhat. If I use rp3 to dial
in into any account, host resolving works without any need for
me specify any nameserver. Now, I understand that rp3 is a
wrapper for wvdial. If I try to dial into thos
73 matches
Mail list logo
