Re: large filesystem under Linux

2000-10-26 Thread G. T. Francisco
On Mon, Oct 23, 2000 at 10:52:48AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > > Hi, I'm running RedHat 6.2 on an IBM Netfinity 5000 (PII 450+512meg RAM) I > have a RAID controller card on this machine (IBM ServeRAID 3L) and what > I'd like to do is make a large filesystem 290+gig on the linux box. Any > p

Re: pop drop account

2000-04-16 Thread G. T. Francisco
On Wed, Apr 12, 2000 at 09:49:43AM -0500, Head Technician @ Mathco.com said: > A friend of mine has a interesting problem. > All the company mail goes to one pop account > and then they want to retrive it from that > pop account and distribute it to individual > users on the local linux server. (k

Re: Decoder ring for log file?

2000-05-22 Thread G. T. Francisco
On Mon, May 22, 2000 at 01:12:34PM -0700, Sam Bayne said: > PROTO=17 -- The IP Protocol ID, in this case UDP. This field is how > you tell if a given packet is UDP, TCP, ICMP, whatever. I > deduced that this was UDP based on other info in the log > e

Re: <>

2000-06-06 Thread G. T. Francisco
On Tue, Jun 06, 2000 at 01:35:55PM +0200, Gustav Schaffter said: > Most GUI email clients require you to give one (and only one) sender > email address. It's normally a pain to change it. Not once of course, > but if you have to do it many times during the day... > > I'd like to find some way of

Re: forgot root password

2000-06-06 Thread G. T. Francisco
On Tue, Jun 06, 2000 at 09:39:25PM -0600, Philippe Moutarlier said: > "CH" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > That is a real big security hole if it were used in business. All you would > > have to do is reset if you could not shutdown -r without being root or > > equivalent privilige. (Am I rig

Re: ipchains interface with -L

2000-06-09 Thread G. T. Francisco
On Fri, Jun 09, 2000 at 09:54:19AM +0200, Gustav Schaffter said: > When executing 'ipchains -L' or 'ipchains -nL' I do not see the > interfaces concerned for the existing rules. > > Q: What options would I give to ipchains to also see the interfaces? > > I've read the man page for ipchains, but

Re: anonymous ftp - a new twist

2000-06-12 Thread G. T. Francisco
On Mon, Jun 12, 2000 at 08:31:42AM -0400, Burke, Thomas G. said: > OK, I disabled my firewall rules, disabled portsentry, logged in to the > machine and typed "ftp localhost". > > Response from the machine: "ftp: connect: connectin refused" > > I checked inetd.conf, and ftp is not commented out.

Re: MS Breakup

2000-06-12 Thread G. T. Francisco
On Mon, Jun 12, 2000 at 08:30:02PM -0400, Jon Knews said: > > Hey, I used to be a OS/2 phenatic, then I found Linux. ;-))) > As a former OS/2 guy, I would love to see Linux with the OS/2 Workplace Shell rather than KDE or Gnome!!! Cheers, -- To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "uns

Re: ipchains stops logging...?

2000-06-13 Thread G. T. Francisco
On Tue, Jun 13, 2000 at 12:18:10PM -0400, Hal Burgiss said: > On Tue, Jun 13, 2000 at 07:01:00AM -0700, Mike wrote: > > > > I am running redhat 6.1 and ipchains 1.3.9. I set up firewalling to log > > several of the more commonly denied packet types. I get probably 8 to 10 > > 'hits' on port 137

Re: ipchains stops logging...?

2000-06-14 Thread G. T. Francisco
On Wed, Jun 14, 2000 at 06:52:30PM -0700, Mike said: > > Very odd, indeed that's it. When logrotate rotates /var/log/messages > ipchains no longer logs. Re-running /etc/rc.d/init.d/firewall does not > seem to restore logging. Rebooting does, however I'm sure that is extreme > and there is like

Re: ftp problems

2000-06-15 Thread G. T. Francisco
On Thu, Jun 15, 2000 at 09:38:36AM -0500, Scott Skrogstad said: > I have a 6.1 RH server and I have ftp enabled in the inetd.conf and I > still can't ftp into the server. What am I missing ? > Are you sure you installed the ftp daemon when you installed RH 6.1? You can check by giving the comma

Re: Ports

2000-06-21 Thread G. T. Francisco
On Wed, Jun 21, 2000 at 06:39:22PM +0530, UK Jaiswal said: > Which command should I run to see on which ports different services > are running. I guess /etc/services contains just the standard > predifined ports and services. > netstat -ap -- To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "uns

Re: ipchains question: which NIC?

2000-06-26 Thread G. T. Francisco
On Mon, Jun 26, 2000 at 05:14:08PM -0500, Bob Hartung said: > A basic ipchains question from a neophyte: > I am using a two NIC P90 as a masquerade server for a DNS connection. > When I write ipchain rules for Accept, Reject, or Deny how do I, or do I > never, know which NIC I am appending rule

Re: Legal DNS Name

2000-06-26 Thread G. T. Francisco
On Tue, Jun 27, 2000 at 08:35:28AM +1000, Danny said: > > Don't think you can have underscores in the domain name. > The most amazing thing is in Decmeber last year they started to allow domains > to have a max of 64 letters. > > I can't imagine anyone typing the domainname with 64 letters!!! >

How to set up another root account?

2000-06-30 Thread G. T. Francisco
For I back up purposes, how can I set up another root account, e.g. root2? Thanks, -- To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" as the Subject.

Re: How to set up another root account?

2000-07-01 Thread G. T. Francisco
On Sat, Jul 01, 2000 at 12:01:57AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > Setup a normal account with adduser like you normally do then edit /etc/passwd > to change the UID/GID to "0" (as it is for root) > > At Fri, 30 Jun 2000 14:55:29 -0500, "G. T. Francisco" <[E

Re: Cable router vs. IPMASQ

2000-07-20 Thread G. T. Francisco
On Mon, Jul 17, 2000 at 12:19:13PM -0500, Alan Mead said: > A friend is getting a cable modem and I started to tell him how we need to > set up a $40 486-based IP_Masq gateway using the LRP distribution. But he > thought that sounded too complicated. So I showed him Linksys' $190 > cable-rout

Re: How to tell if XFree is 4.0 or 3.3.3?

2000-12-28 Thread G. T. Francisco
On Thu, Dec 28, 2000 at 06:17:22PM -0400, Ted Gervais said: > > > > $ rpm -q XFree86 > > XFree86-4.0.1-1 > > > > thornton > > I just tried the above and it says xfree86 is not installed?? Funny where I > am running KDE2 etc... Don't I need xfree86 for that? > rpm's query is case sensitive. Inp

Re: Lots of attempts on port 111 lately...

2000-12-28 Thread G. T. Francisco
On Thu, Dec 28, 2000 at 10:17:53PM -, Peter Kiem said: > Hi Thomas, > > > The subject says it all, I have had a shitload of attempts on port > > 111 (sunrpc) lately... Is there some new bug on the r* stuff, or is it just > > that all the script kiddies are out on vacation? Anybody else

Re: (OT)Where do I go for this?

2000-12-30 Thread G. T. Francisco
On Sat, Dec 30, 2000 at 10:19:51AM -0800, lee said: > speaking of cable accessi'm considering cable from at&t but anyone use > them with linux/redhat7? > I'm using AT&T's Mediaone with linux -- they do not provide any support. Configuration is relatively straightforward -- it's not PPOE, jus

Re: Virus was sent from the list!!!!

2001-12-11 Thread G. T. Francisco, III
On Tue, Dec 11, 2001 at 11:02:58PM -0500, Admin-myispnet said: > I got the same virus...thank God i got norton > thank God i use linux :) G-3 ___ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Re: dhcp and machine names

2001-12-16 Thread G. T. Francisco, III
On Sun, Dec 16, 2001 at 06:14:28PM -0600, BobH said: > Hi, > I am thinking of setting up a dhcpd server [for the heck of it and to > gain some experience] on my home network. I am just starting to read the > docs, but the question I have not seen answered is how I can address to a > certain ma

Re: Is tcpd now redundant if using ipchains/iptables ? (RE: IPChains vs IPTables)

2002-01-15 Thread G. T. Francisco, III
On Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 12:12:31AM +, chas said: > Pls excuse my ignorance here but if one is using ipchains or iptables, > is tcp wrappers now redundant ? (ipchains certainly seems so much more > flexible). Anybody using both ? > Yes, I use both. tcp wrappers provides more granular acces. F

Re: Is tcpd now redundant if using ipchains/iptables ? (RE: IPChains vs IPTables)

2002-01-16 Thread G. T. Francisco, III
On Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 05:39:44PM -0500, Anthony E. Greene said: > > > You can restrict access to specific IP/hostnames using itptables too. The > fact that you use tcpwrappers instead is probably a matter of habit or > training; it's not a limitation of the software. > True. But I tend to l

Re: Free Disk Space

2002-01-16 Thread G. T. Francisco, III
On Wed, Jan 16, 2002 at 11:11:49AM -0600, Jay Paulson said: > What is the command in the terminal prompt to get how much free space is on your HD? >I've been looking for this and haven't found it anywhere! > "man du" "man free" "man df" ___ Redhat-

Re: transparent xconsole

2002-01-22 Thread G. T. Francisco, III
On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 02:20:41PM +1000, Matthew Melvin said: > I don't know if it 100% fits what you want.. but I like to use root-tail to > do this... it tails a file and writes it on the X root window... so no shell > or borders or anything. > Unfortunately, last time I tried root-tail, it do

Re: RTL8139c broadcast problems

2002-02-01 Thread G. T. Francisco, III
On Fri, Feb 01, 2002 at 04:29:27PM -0800, Brian Wright said: > Hi, List! > > I just installed RH 7.2 on a rackmount with a RealTek 8139c ethernet > card. Running ifconfig brings up eth0 just fine, but when I try to ping > any IP addy, I keep getting "destination host unreachable". > Are you abl

Re: RTL8139c broadcast problems

2002-02-04 Thread G. T. Francisco, III
On Fri, Feb 01, 2002 at 05:17:01PM -0800, Brian Wright said: > > Are you able to ping yourself? Try "ping localhost" or "ping 127.0.0.1" > > Yes, I can ping localhost and 127.0.0.1, and also the machine's assigned > IP and domain name. Can you ping your gateway? You may have a routing problem.

Re: finding if a process is running

2002-02-08 Thread G. T. Francisco, III
On Fri, Feb 08, 2002 at 04:50:06PM -0600, Bryan Pershall said: > How do I find if a process is running if I know the name of it > Try "ps aux |grep -i name_of_process" Cheers, ___ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com

Re: Wireless lan cards?

2002-02-12 Thread G. T. Francisco, III
On Mon, Feb 11, 2002 at 10:57:12PM -0800, Steve Lee said: > This is what i do at home. > i do have wireless, have dhcp setup. > however, dhcp is only setup to allow one machine to > connect, my laptop, with only my mac address, to bind. > so it only allows my computer to connect dhcp. > others are

Re: determining the block an IP belongs to ( was Re: Connection Attempt to TCP Port 2000)

2002-02-12 Thread G. T. Francisco, III
On Tue, Feb 12, 2002 at 11:40:57AM -0800, Rob Saul said: > > On Tuesday 12 February 2002 03:08, Fred Herman wrote: > > Well, whatever was going on, there were 5 outside connections within 40 > > minutes from ip's in net blocks belonging to Turkey, Kuwait, Belgium, > > Canada, and one US isp. >

Re: WWW Visitor Blocking

2002-02-23 Thread G. T. Francisco, III
On Fri, Feb 22, 2002 at 05:01:36PM -0700, Ashley M. Kirchner said: > Yeah, I argued that point as well...they don't care. They want them blocked, > regardless of the (Corporate) Company being a US based company with offices around >the > world. And for those outside of the US, using any typ

Re: Bind/DHCP Annoying me.

2002-04-09 Thread G. T. Francisco, III
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 05:04:06PM -0600, Rodolfo J. Paiz said: > possible machine for which I'd consistently want to use a name gets the > same address every time, so I have to configure DNS manually *and* > configure dhcpd to hand out static addresses to each machine by hand. > Tedious as hel

Re: crond logging

2002-04-20 Thread G. T. Francisco, III
On Wed, Apr 17, 2002 at 12:21:28PM -0400, Devon Harding - GTHLA said: > Will cron messages still get logged to /var/log/cron ? > > -Devon > > -Original Message----- > From: G. T. Francisco, III [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 10:17 AM &

Re: MS FUD

2002-05-01 Thread G. T. Francisco, III
On Tue, Apr 30, 2002 at 11:44:18PM -0400, Michael Fratoni said: > Q. Why should a donor include the operating system with their PC donation? > > A. It is a legal requirement that pre-installed operating systems remain > with a machine for the life of the machine. If a company or individual > do