I'm running a nightly backup using dump. I'm outputting the information
to a log file /var/log/backup. I would like to add to the file each time
I run a backup. How do I do that? Do I use cat?
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/lis
So simple. Thank you very much.
> I am assumong that you use something on the order of
>
> dumpcommandline > /var/log/backup
> If so - change to dumpcommandline >> /var/log/backup
>
> the >> appends rather than writing to the file.
>
> On Tuesday 22
Check out this article on Slashdot. It's important to note SCO's
(formerly known as Caldera) role in Linux obtaining SMP code. They had a
programmer who was working on SMP for Linux. It's easy to see how code
would have been copied from UNIX to Linux that way. If that is even what
happened.
SC
Have you tried using screen? That's what I use. You simply:
# screen
# ./hlds_run ...
# ctrl-D (detach screen)
Then when you want to access it again you have to use
screen -r
> Hello everybody,
>
> I have a little problem with the CS linux server. I installed the latest
> HalfLife and CS li
I'm using tar to do nightly backups. I would like to get some useful
information out of it to put in a log file. I would like to know if the
backup completed successfully, how big the backup was and what files had
to be excluded. Does anyone have any ideas?
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubsc
I've tried the -v option but my logs come out to be 5-10Mb in size
(depending on the server). It just lists the file names being backed up.
>
> "AragonX" wrote:
>> I'm using tar to do nightly backups. I would like to get some
>> useful information out of
me ns +maxplayers 18
+map ns_eclipse -pingboost 2)...
So what this does is start screen, detach the session and run hlds. Then
if you want to access it you can just type 'screen -r' from the command
line.
I hope that answers your question.
> On Tuesday, 29 July, 2003 15:04, AragonX
Some versions of ghost could only copy a Linux partition. They would not
be able to resize it. I can't remember what versions. All you would have
to do in this case is use parted though. That is what the tool was
designed for. :)
> Sergio Espinoza wrote:
>> Thanks a lot for th
In the future, you might want to consider using parted instead of fdisk.
Parted will create the file system at the same time that it creates the
partition. Although, it is a bit more risky to use. I've blown away
whole drives with one misinformed command. :/
> Thanks to all you guys who answe
I just did this a week or so ago. The way I did it was this:
1) Put the new hard drive in as a slave.
2) Used parted to create the filesystem. (parted also has the ability to
copy a filesystem but I couldn't get this to work)
3) Copy the file system with the cp command. I can't remember if I
I whole heartedly agree. I'm constantly in search of new clients because
once the server is installed, there isn't anything else for me to bill
for. The last time I had any server downtime at any of my clients was 3
years ago. And that was a new server install that had faulty RAM...
> On Wed,
Believe it or not, I and Linux got the rap for that bad RAM. That
customer still talks about that crash. lol. Still a good customer.
I have gotten word-of-mouth business but not nearly enough. I must be
doing something wrong :/
> For me, in a town as small as this - talk goes far. Reputation
There is no such thing as a 'hidden' cost. If you consider maintenance
costs as hidden, you need to open your eyes.
Any organization that limits itself to a single technology ends up costing
itself much more money than they might save in personnel. Most major
companies have realized this and use
>> Another great difference and advantage that Linux box can have over
>> MS Products are flexibility, stability, and SECURITY (among
>> others) that MS cannot meet at par with Linux.
>
> Not to defend Microsoft products, but Windows *can* be flexible (sorta),
> *can* be stable (at times), and *ca
> Hi,
> I'm planning to move smtp server to behind firewall.
> SMTP server running RHL 8.0 with Sendmail 8.12.8-1.80, and firewall is
> also
> running RHL 8.0 with IPTables.
How much security do you want? You could us masquerading. Make your
firewall smtp.xxx.com and simply forward port 25 to t
> On Wed, Sep 17, 2003 at 10:56:06AM -0500, Benjamin J. Weiss wrote:
>> Now, if your NAS is on the other end of a fast fiber connection a couple
>> of
>> miles down the road ;)
>
> Picture this scenario:
>
> - One storage box onsite
> - One identical storage box offsite over fast fiber connect
> At 11:00 9/18/2003 -0400, you wrote:
>>Doesn't the fast fiber connection cost on a monthly basis? So you go
>> from
>>a fixed cost solution to a monthly cost. It might be cost effective to
>>start but for how long will that remain true?
>
> Not always. You're assuming your market, your carrier
> On Wed, Sep 17, 2003 at 10:56:06AM -0500, Benjamin J. Weiss wrote:
>> Now, if your NAS is on the other end of a fast fiber connection a couple
>> of
>> miles down the road ;)
>
> Picture this scenario:
>
> - One storage box onsite
> - One identical storage box offsite over fast fiber connect
Is there an easy way to get dump to put multiple volumes on a single tape?
> tar is fine for getting a directory and its contents, but for anything
> more complex, it's much harder to live with. cpio and dump are both
> able to back up a directory without its contents, which is important if
> yo
Great. That's what I'm doing now but I wasn't sure if there was a better
way to do it.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: AragonX [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2003 8:02 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: backup scripts
>
>
If you are looking for proprietary software, BRU is pretty nice. I've
also used LoneTar which was okay. I don't remember if LoneTar had a X
frontend. I know it uses Curses.
> Hi. I've just installed a new RH9 system that has an Onstream tape
> drive. Looks like the OS sees it. What backup util
There are quite a few, very easy to install firewalls on freshmeat.net. I
personally like firewall by Jim. It has a nice install script and
wouldn't be any more difficult to install than any other program. That
is, as long as your kernel is properly configured and you have Iptables
installed.
I
Is there a program that will keep track of your server's uptime? Like
give you your longest uptime and give you uptime percentages for year,
month, week and day?
>
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, 7 Jun 2003, kluu te wrote:
>
>> How do you find the uptime for the server.
>
> Use uptime command :-)
>
> It c
Here is a good place to start:
http://www.ibiblio.org/pub/Linux/docs/HOWTO/SMB-HOWTO
That looks a little old, so you could also go here:
http://us2.samba.org/samba/docs/
If you still have questions after reading those docs, try posting on the
Samba mailing list which can be found here:
http://
> Myth #1 - Stability. Linux is a more stable OS then windows (2000/XP).
> This
> true enough, UNLESS you're talking about desktop Linux ie: KDE or Gnome.
> To believe that any "out of the box" install of any current major distro
> setup as a desktop (KDE or Gnome) is more stable than an equivale
;t support dual
monitors too well. My Linux does so beautifully though. :)
> On Wed, Jun 11, 2003 at 03:18:39PM -0400, AragonX wrote:
> [...]
>> Now here is where we see eye to eye. Somewhat...
>>
>> X has been disappointing to me. I still have to use Windows because I
>&
If that doesn't work, make sure your Windows machine has the same
workgroup name defined. Also, you might have to enable WINS support on
both the client and the server. Sometimes other protocols like IPX
interfere. Make sure you have unused protocols removed.
> Scarletdown wrote:
>
>> On 15 Ju
I Need to scan the network at one of me clients to see which PCs are being
left on at night. What is the best way to do this? Currently I'm using:
nmap -sP. Will that give any false responses? For instance, computers
that have WOL enabled?
Thank you for any help.
--
redhat-list mailing list
It's been a while since I've played with X but here is what I can remember:
Check the "screen" section and make sure the "display" mode is 800x600.
Also make sure the depth is something your card can handle (try 8 first).
Also, there might be a XF86Config-4 file that you also may need to edit
in
Okay, I just noticed this issue on a second server. At first, I thought
it was something wrong with my old server so I didn't bother much with it.
I have two servers that are running custom built kernel version 2.4.18.
I've tried to update both of them to 2.4.19, 2.4.20 and 2.4.21. They
always
30 matches
Mail list logo