If you have grub installed already, you need to make sure that you edit
/boot/grub/menu.lst to your liking, then write grub to your MBR.
here is a snipping from a previou message:
GRUB version 0.92 (640K lower / 3072K upper memory)
[ Minimal BASH-like line editing is supported. For th
Stop using the RedHat stock firewall - it is more trouble than it's
worth. Go download Shorewall: http://shorewall.sf.net
READ the docs - use the 'stock' config setup that suits you, and if you
have read the docs, and still can't figure it out, write the list. It
is a nice package, and my firs
Thanks Bret for the hints.
I'll se which one I use.
Bret Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sat, 2002-11-16 at 11:09, linux power wrote:> > I have not heard abput scp> No its really not so many files and not so often.If I want to use ftp is there more that must be done that opening port 21?eithe
On Sat, 2002-11-16 at 14:42, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> On Sat, 2002-11-16 at 14:06, Will Mendez wrote:
> >
> > > Are you using an NVidia card with their accelerated drivers? If so, try
> > > removing those drivers and see if the problem still occurs with Red
> > > Hat's nvidia driver.
> > >
> > > I
BTW, I should probably mention that you run 'grub', logged in as root.
On Sun, 2002-11-17 at 00:35, Joshua Schmidlkofer wrote:
> If you have grub installed already, you need to make sure that you edit
> /boot/grub/menu.lst to your liking, then write grub to your MBR.
>
> here is a snipping fro
nate wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > What is the subnet-mask of IP "172.16.0.1" - "172.16.0.253" ?
> > How to calculate ?
>
> that would be a class C - /24 or 255.255.255.0
>
> since the 2nd to last number(octet) is the same, you can use
> this chart as a reference:
> http://portal.aphroland.org/resourc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 17 Nov 2002 11:53:21 +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > > > Is it include security ?
> > > >
> > > > Pardon?
> > >
> > > Is it including Firewall ( prevent hacker to hack the Server
> > > machine )?
> >
> > It only manipulates outgoing pack
Actually that is a class B address.
The first octet of a class A is 1-126 (127 reserved for loop back)
class B is 128-191
class C is 192-223
since 172 is between the ranges of 128-191 that would make it class B
Class B subnet 255.255.0.0 or /16
Doug
I'm trying to update the kernel but up2date says I don't have 5MB on the
/ drive, but there is.
[root@server src]# up2date -d kernel
Testing package set / solving RPM inter-dependencies...
RPM package conflict error. The message was:
Test install failed b
Well, I'd look at it differently. School boards always look at the
current bottom line--what does this cost me **NOW** (becuase in a year or
two I might not be on the Board). Your requests will fall on deaf ears
until such time as it will save the district real current money. And then,
of course,
Doug Potter wrote:
> Actually that is a class B address.
>
> The first octet of a class A is 1-126 (127 reserved for loop back)
> class B is 128-191
> class C is 192-223
>
> since 172 is between the ranges of 128-191 that would make it class B
>
> Class B
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 17-Nov-2002/07:44 -0500, Doug Potter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Actually that is a class B address.
>
>The first octet of a class A is 1-126 (127 reserved for loop back)
> class B is 128-191
>class C is 192-2
Hi Chirs,
> Test install failed because of package conflicts:
> installing package kernel-2.4.18-18.7.x needs 5Mb on the / filesystem
>
> [root@server src]# df -h
> FilesystemSize Used Avail Use% Mounted on
> /dev/hda8 251M 215M 23M 91% /
> /dev/hda1 53M
The 172.16.0.1 - 172.16.0.255 is a Class B IP range.
The range that you are specifying is still in the Class B subnet range,
but it is similar to a Class C because you are getting 254 effective IP
addresses like you would if you had a Class C range. Hence the
255.255.255.0 or /24 to which Nate
On Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 04:50:31PM -0800, Daevid Vincent wrote:
> Procmail is the best, most useful program on my linux box. And bless
> you for that recepie ;-)
Yes, this list has a number of annoyances from time to time. This is
my redhat annoyances filters:
# Redhat lists annoyances.
:0
*
Actually, that block would also include 172.16.0.253, and the netmask
would be 255.255.255.0
How to calculate it...that's a bit more complicated to explain than is
feasible, here, in an email message.
A quick Yahoo/Google search yields a lot of references, but the following
site;
http://www.c
I'm running RH 8.0 with the default installation of procmail. I have it
set up as completely as seems necessary, but it will not flag and then
act upon messages which I think ought to be tagged.
I'm sure I've made a dumb configuration error somewhere, but can't find
it.
None of my header or subj
Given the range of addresses he's looking to calculate, that would only be
half correct.
The initial address range is, indeed, in the class B range. However, the
fact that he only wants to go to 172.16.0.253 (realistically, he can't
stop there, though, so would have to go to 254) indicates a c
correction to link:
http://www.csc.fi.english/funet/calc/laskin2.html <--orginal
http://www.csc.fi/english/funet/calc/laskin2.html <--corrected
Also 3com has a very good document explaining IP addressing.
Unfortunately all I get when I go to their web site is a blank page
(something Mozilla can'
You've got the wrong X-Spam flag, there.
It should be "X-Spam Status: YES"
Additionally, try "^Subject.*" instead of "^Subject: *".
On 17 Nov 2002, Brad Alpert wrote:
> I'm running RH 8.0 with the default installation of procmail. I have it
> set up as completely as seems necessary, but it wil
Found it! 63 pages to be exact
www.3com.com/other/pdfs/infra/ corpinfo/en_US/501302.pdf
david
On Sun, 17 Nov 2002, dbrett wrote:
>
> correction to link:
>
> http://www.csc.fi.english/funet/calc/laskin2.html <--orginal
> http://www.csc.fi/english/funet/calc/laskin2.html <--corrected
>
> Also 3
Ok, made both changes, same result.
Here's the procmail log for the message I sent to my test loop address
with "Test" as the sole entry in the subject:
procmail: [32114] Sun Nov 17 10:31:04 2002
procmail: Match on "< 256000"
procmail: Executing "spamassassin"
procmail: [32114] Sun Nov 17 10:31:0
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 17 Nov 2002 07:44:38 -0500, Doug Potter wrote:
> Actually that is a class B address.
>
> The first octet of a class A is 1-126 (127 reserved for loop back)
> class B is 128-191
>class C is 192-223
>
> sinc
Michael Schwendt wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 17 Nov 2002 07:44:38 -0500, Doug Potter wrote:
>
> > Actually that is a class B address.
> >
> > The first octet of a class A is 1-126 (127 reserved for loop back)
> > class B is 128-191
> >
On Sun, Nov 17, 2002 at 11:04:07AM -0500, Mike Burger wrote:
> You've got the wrong X-Spam flag, there.
>
> It should be "X-Spam Status: YES"
Shouldn't it be "X-Spam Status: Yes"?
At least that's what I use and it works fine. To be honest, I'm not
sure how case-sensitive procmail is wrt recip
I've tried it both ways. I changed it to uppercase, no change.
However, the instant problem is the failure of procmail to flag the
^Subject: Test condition that I specified in the previous message.
Any idea on that one? I can test with a Subject=Test condition more
easily than waiting for spam
I just installed RH8 on a P3-1000 machine which has a new SB16PCI card.
Whenever XMMS or the CD Player is opened, there is no audio until the
Gnome Volume Control is opened and both the main volume control and the
pcm slider (for XMMS) or the CD Volume for the CD player are bumped.
The MP3 patch h
> Thank for your help first !
> How to study / learn about the file "subnet.txt"
> I don't understand "netmask","aggregate","addresses" and "wild bits"
>
subnettting is for sure not my strong point :) you may be able
to learn a bit more from this document:
http://portal.aphroland.org/resourc
My bad...typo time.
"X-Spam-Status"...I must have hit the space bar instead of the - key.
Sorry.
On Sun, 17 Nov 2002, Brad Alpert wrote:
> Ok, made both changes, same result.
>
> Here's the procmail log for the message I sent to my test loop address
> with "Test" as the sole entry in the subje
Damn...another typo on my part...the missing -, and the all caps Yes.
On Sun, 17 Nov 2002, Kevin MacNeil wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 17, 2002 at 11:04:07AM -0500, Mike Burger wrote:
> > You've got the wrong X-Spam flag, there.
> >
> > It should be "X-Spam Status: YES"
>
> Shouldn't it be "X-Spam Statu
Corrected, it still doesn't work.
It's the ^Subject. *Test stuff I'm actually testing, because generating
a Test subject line is easier than composing spam messages.
Any ideas on why procmail is running but not behaving in accordance with
the ^Subject. *Test conditional?
procmail: [32114] Sun No
I just want to say thanks for all the tips everyone has given me on
purchasing a server!
I haven't had the chance to run out and get one just yet, though - work is
crazy right now, deadlines, etc, etc.
(I also wasn't expecting such a fast response to my question, either.)
Thanks again, I really do
I've found that:
MAILDIR=$HOME/mail
:0 H:
* ^X-Spam-Status: Yes
Spam
... etc
works fine via my ~/.procmailrc.
Note - I am running SpamAssassin on a global level via /etc/procmailrc
through the spamd daemon (much less CPU overhead). Not sure that should make
a difference in your case.
FYI: The
Hi,
I want to run my Linux server (RedHat v8.0) as a
fileserver for Windows NT/2000/XP clients. These
clients are part of a Windows domain. I want the
authentication (users/groups) to go against the
Windows PDC . . . without creating corresponding
userIDs and groups on the Linux system (there wou
Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On 17 Nov 2002 07:44:38 -0500, Doug Potter wrote:
>
> > Actually that is a class B address.
> >
> > The first octet of a class A is 1-126 (127 reserved for loop back)
> > class B is 128-191
> > class C is 192-223
> >
> > since 172 is between the
On Mon, Nov 18, 2002 at 01:22:39AM +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Michael Schwendt wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > On 17 Nov 2002 07:44:38 -0500, Doug Potter wrote:
> >
> > > Actually that is a class B address.
> > >
> > > The first octet of a class A is 1-1
On Sun, Nov 17, 2002 at 06:03:37PM +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On 17 Nov 2002 07:44:38 -0500, Doug Potter wrote:
> > Actually that is a class B address.
> >
> > The first octet of a class A is 1-126 (127 reserved for loop back)
> > class B is 128-191
> >
Greg Fisher said:
> Hi,
> I want to run my Linux server (RedHat v8.0) as a
> fileserver for Windows NT/2000/XP clients. These
> clients are part of a Windows domain. I want the
> authentication (users/groups) to go against the
> Windows PDC . . . without creating corresponding
>
perhaps you didn
Thank you for the feedback, Rick. I made the relevant change you
suggested in the spam test.
But I'm not testing the spam filter right now, because I don't get that
much of it and I haven't bothered to generate bogus spam messages to
send myself.
What I am concentrating on is the failure of my ^
On Sun, 2002-11-17 at 09:39, Lloyd Hanson wrote:
>
> Whenever XMMS or the CD Player is opened, there is no audio until the
> Gnome Volume Control is opened and both the main volume control and the
> pcm slider (for XMMS) or the CD Volume for the CD player are bumped.
> The MP3 patch has been appli
On Sun, 2002-11-17 at 00:45, Joshua Schmidlkofer wrote:
> On Sat, 2002-11-16 at 14:42, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> >
> > It's probably a particularly bad idea to use the NVidia drivers on
> > Psyche until NVidia provides a package that includes a binary module
> > compiled with gcc 3.2.
> >
>
> Or,
Brad Alpert wrote:
> What I am concentrating on is the failure of my ^Subject.*Test
> condition. The /var/log/procmail log shows that the condition isn't
> catching a message sent to myself with the subject line as "Test".
Is this a global rule or a user rule?
> Any ideas of why procmail, whe
My system is locking up if left alone for a couple of hours. I recently
upgraded to 8.0. Didn't happen with 7.3.
Anybody got any ideas?
Sarah
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 17 Nov 2002 14:33:54 -0500, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
> > > > Actually that is a class B address.
> > > >
> > > > The first octet of a class A is 1-126 (127 reserved for loop
> > > > back)
> > > > class B is 128-191
> > >
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 17 Nov 2002 14:31:00 -0500, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 17, 2002 at 06:03:37PM +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> > On 17 Nov 2002 07:44:38 -0500, Doug Potter wrote:
>
> > > Actually that is a class B address.
> > >
> > > The firs
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 17 Nov 2002 21:49:13 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> mistake. It's so easy to dig out RFC1918 and look up the section
> which mentions the 16 contiguous class B network numbers 172.16.0.0
> - - 172.31.255.255 in Class B (128.0.0.0 - 191.255.2
On Nov 17, 2002, 13:48 (-0600) Brad Alpert wrote:
> Thank you for the feedback, Rick. I made the relevant change you
> suggested in the spam test.
>
> But I'm not testing the spam filter right now, because I don't get that
> much of it and I haven't bothered to generate bogus spam messages to
> s
Ok Rick, here goes:
> > What I am concentrating on is the failure of my ^Subject.*Test
> > condition. The /var/log/procmail log shows that the condition isn't
> > catching a message sent to myself with the subject line as "Test".
>
> Is this a global rule or a user rule?
Global. spamd is runni
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 17 Nov 2002 12:29:42 -0800, Rick Johnson wrote:
> Brad Alpert wrote:
>
>
>
> > What I am concentrating on is the failure of my ^Subject.*Test
> > condition. The /var/log/procmail log shows that the condition isn't
> > catching a message se
Wolfgang wrote:
> :0:
> * ^Subject:.*Test.*
> spam
>
> Please note the dots around 'Test': Perhaps your mail program, or
> whatever, is writing spaces around 'Test'. And I don't know whether
> procmail 'sees' spaces as characters. ... If it does, the dots should
> catch that ...
>
> Hoping i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 17-Nov-2002/10:48 -0500, Hal Burgiss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Yes, this list has a number of annoyances from time to time. This is
>my redhat annoyances filters:
[snip]
That is both the best set of list filters I've seen, and the best laugh
I've
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 17 Nov 2002 15:19:36 -0600, Brad Alpert wrote:
> Wolfgang wrote:
>
> > :0:
> > * ^Subject:.*Test.*
> > spam
> >
> > Please note the dots around 'Test': Perhaps your mail program, or
> > whatever, is writing spaces around 'Test'. And I don't
Michael Schwendt suggested the following ruleset:
> >
> > Ok, tried that, no differnce. Procmail still fails to fire.
> >
> > I think procmail ignores spaces in a line.
>
> Can you get any other recipe to work? And would
>
> :0:
> * ^Subject:.*
> spam
>
> catch your message?
No it didn't.
** Reply to message from SarahTF <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Sun, 17 Nov 2002
15:33:05 -0500
> My system is locking up if left alone for a couple of hours. I recently
> upgraded to 8.0. Didn't happen with 7.3.
>
> Anybody got any ideas?
Try:
/sbin/service apmd stop
If that works, also do:
/sbin/
Hey all, I've been following this thread pretty closely, as I'm wanting to set up a spam filter such
as the one described at:
http://www.fadden.com/techmisc/asian-spam.htm
I then went to tldp.org and found:
http://www.tldp.org/HOWTO/Mail-Administrator-HOWTO.html
Which I followed up by lookin
I used RHN to update the kernel and now see multiple versions of linux on my grub loader screen. I'm happy enough with the new version to trust getting rid of the old one how do I do that?
Thanks for any input you may have.
--Hise
"rpm -e kernel-version"
On 17 Nov 2002, Hise Chapman wrote:
> I used RHN to update the kernel and now see multiple versions of linux
> on my grub loader screen. I'm happy enough with the new version to
> trust getting rid of the old one how do I do that?
>
> Thanks for any input you may hav
Any Dmesg dumps or notable entries in /var/log/messages?
--
Rick Johnson, RHCE - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux/WAN Administrator - Medata, Inc. (from home)
PGP Key: https://mail.medata.com/pgp/rjohnson.asc
- Original Message -
From: "SarahTF" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: S
Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote:
> .. already tried this?
>
> :0:
> * ^Subject:.*Test.*
> spam
The trailing .* is unnecessary since procmail automatically assumes .* after
your regex string.
-Rick
--
Rick Johnson, RHCE - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux/WAN Administrator - Medata, Inc.
PGP Key: https://mail.meda
Title: Message
unsubscribe
Brad Alpert wrote:
> > Can you get any other recipe to work? And would
> >
> > :0:
> > * ^Subject:.*
> > spam
> >
> > catch your message?
>
> No it didn't.
>
> The only rule that works is the spamassassin one, in the sense that
> procmailrc properly calls it, applies the spam scores, and then injec
Hise Chapman wrote:
> I used RHN to update the kernel and now see multiple versions of linux
> on my grub loader screen. I'm happy enough with the new version to
> trust getting rid of the old one how do I do that?
>
> Thanks for any input you may have.
>
> --Hise
>
rpm -e
For instance (R
Most probably that's true. But wouldn't the log show a choke if it
tried to write, and couldn't find the right folder?
I'm the only user on the machine, other than root. I wanted to get
system-wide procmail going and finetune things next.
I've changed the recipe to send the ^Subject:.*Test to /
That only works when e-mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Jon
On Sun, 2002-11-17 at 19:33, Steve Keefe wrote:
> unsubscribe
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Is anyone else having trouble with the 2.4.18-x kernel?
Specifically, it doesn't LIKE my promsie Ultra66 ATA controller. Cannot
(reliably) access the drive on /dev/hdg (promise controller, second IDE
channel, master). Tends to hang the mount or e2fsck or whatever commands,
tends to do weird thing
Rh 8.0 Apache 2.0.40 and stock install. Get a child process segfault
whenever trying to access a page with a .htaccess file in the directory.
Anyone have any ideas? I have searched the net, been over the config
endlessly, remade all the .htaccess and .htpasswd files using the new
utilities, and
If the logic below is correct - the reason the spamassassin rule works is
because you're not writing to a spool, but filtering (piping) to a program.
-Rick
--
Rick Johnson, RHCE - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux/WAN Administrator - Medata, Inc. (from home)
PGP Key: https://mail.medata.com/pgp/rjohnson.asc
No problems for me yet on an RH 7.3 athlon 2.4.18-18 (or 17) kernel or on
8.0 on the same kernel versions. One is an Ultra/100 (7.3) and the other is
an Ultra/66 (8.0) controller.
-Rick
--
Rick Johnson, RHCE - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux/WAN Administrator - Medata, Inc. (from home)
PGP Key: https://ma
Ok then, I obviously need to get back to the root basics.
I've not been able to find any kind of detailed step-by-step for
procmail; rather, all I've found is a pastiche of snippets and hints
that aren't tied together.
Do you have a recommendation on what I should locate for basic procmail
instru
On Sunday 17 November 2002 05:05 pm, Brad Alpert wrote:
> Michael Schwendt suggested the following ruleset:
> > Can you get any other recipe to work? And would
> >
> > :0:
> >
> > * ^Subject:.*
> > spam
> >
> > catch your message?
>
> No it didn't.
>
> The only rule that works is the spamassassin o
Hi Michael
You definitely have everything correct in what you say. Period!
What I have been noticing which is technically incorrect is the reference
to arbitrary assigned address space as class A, B, C or even fractional
class. I see this as labels for people to make things easier.
i.e. calling
On Sun, Nov 17, 2002 at 05:55:42PM -0800, Rick Johnson wrote:
> No problems for me yet on an RH 7.3 athlon 2.4.18-18 (or 17) kernel or on
> 8.0 on the same kernel versions. One is an Ultra/100 (7.3) and the other is
> an Ultra/66 (8.0) controller.
Weird!
I've got the latest firmware in the ultra6
>
> ... The answer is simple: DON'T USE AUTORESPONDERS.
>
I don't think so. Any rule that relies on 100% conformance is not going to
work well
enough. As demonstrated by this episode. It only takes one subscriber out
of this rather large list to forget and ... here we go again.
Is it poss
Hello all,
I apologise if this question has been asked before.
I just installed RH 8 for the first time today and noticed the console
colours are a lot darker than before. It makes some of the programs,
including ones I've written, look like a dog's breakfast.
Does anyone know of any way to make
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 17-Nov-2002/16:31 -0800, Rick Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I'm going on a limb here - but aren't folder specific recipes only
>appropriate in /home//.procmailrc? Otherwise ~/mail/spam would need to
>exist for everyone (assuming that MAILROOT=
Its an Intel 440GX motherboard that has a SCSI HBA in it to accommodate
its 4 hot-swappable drives Its the SCSI chip that kills RedHat -- the
drivers they ship seem to be broken for this version of the aic7896/97
Ultra2 SCSI adapter...
The way one used to get around this under RH 6.2 and 7.1
>I'm not sure I follow, but are you using the ALSA drivers?
No, I believe it's the OSS driver.
The line I have in my modules.conf is:
Alias sound-slot-0 es1371
This checks out as the appropriate driver for the card.
>They default to muted settings.
>Volume settings should be saved on shutdown,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
nate wrote:
Hello,
What is the subnet-mask of IP "172.16.0.1" - "172.16.0.253" ?
How to calculate ?
that would be a class C - /24 or 255.255.255.0
since the 2nd to last number(octet) is the same, you can use
this chart as a reference:
http://portal.aphroland.
I have a question concerning Sparc's. I own a Sparcclassic that has a 50 mhz
CPU, 16 megs of RAM, and a 200 mg SCSI HD. I plan on upgrading it to at
least a 1 gig hard disk and probably maxing out the RAM (48 I believe). I
know that Red Hat no longer supports Sparc and thats fine, I'll use Debian.
Hi,
I'm stumped on this one. I've tried mounting Windows (98, XP) partitions
using various mount options, but it's always mounted read-only. I've
tried
-o rw
-o umask=
to no avail.
Is it possible to set up a Windows partition as writeable?
- Gerry
--
Gerry Kirk
IT consulting for positive
Hi,
I can't find any X Windows tool for changing grub settings. I want to
delete entries for older kernels.
Gerry
--
Gerry Kirk
IT consulting for positive change
http://prime.sourceforge.net
ph 705.759.8026
fax 780.401.3517
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
Does anyone know what kind of applications/packages
reside on the Systems Administrator Tools CD that is found within the Red Hat
8.0 Professional edition? I am contemplating whether to purchase a copy of the
professional edition, eventhough I already own a copy of the personal edition
Can you write to it as root?
Try mounting it with a user id...
mount -t smbfs -o uid=you,rw //remote_machine/share /mount_point
Gerry Kirk wrote:
Hi,
I'm stumped on this one. I've tried mounting Windows (98, XP) partitions
using various mount options, but it's always mounted read-only. I've
tr
--On Sunday, November 17, 2002 10:43:50 PM -0500 Gerry Kirk
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I can't find any X Windows tool for changing grub settings. I want to
delete entries for older kernels.
Aim your favorite text editor at /boot/grub/grup.conf...
-Tom
--
Tom Eastep\ Shorewall - ip
On Sun, 17 Nov 2002, Gerry Kirk wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I can't find any X Windows tool for changing grub settings. I want to
> delete entries for older kernels.
>
> Gerry
>
>
Well, I am not really sure that there is one. You can just use your
favorite text editor, though. I like vim, so I would
On Sun, 2002-11-17 at 21:43, Gerry Kirk wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I can't find any X Windows tool for changing grub settings. I want to
> delete entries for older kernels.
>
> Gerry
>
gvim ?
Bret
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe
https://listman.r
> -Original Message-
> From: Gerry Kirk
> Sent: Sunday, November 17, 2002 9:44 PM
> Subject: What tool to edit grub settings?
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I can't find any X Windows tool for changing grub settings. I want to
> delete entries for older kernels.
I just manually edit (vi) /etc/grub.conf
Dear all:
When i use samba share file and program, i find always have a error"Too
many open files in system".Then you can not login as root,you can not do
anything,but you can only use command 'ps -A ' find smbd process and use
command ' kiss -9 ',next you can use all.So i think maybe smbd
pro
On Sun, 2002-11-17 at 09:48, Hal Burgiss wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 04:50:31PM -0800, Daevid Vincent wrote:
>
> > Procmail is the best, most useful program on my linux box. And bless
> > you for that recepie ;-)
>
> Yes, this list has a number of annoyances from time to time. This is
> my
On Sun, 2002-11-17 at 09:48, Hal Burgiss wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 04:50:31PM -0800, Daevid Vincent wrote:
>
> > Procmail is the best, most useful program on my linux box. And bless
> > you for that recepie ;-)
>
> Yes, this list has a number of annoyances from time to time. This is
> my r
hello RH-List !
i'm just new on the list, and also new in linux.
RH8 is installed on my pc (2.0 GHz,512 Mo), dual with W-XP,
and it seems to be running quite slowly ...
windows and KDE need a lot of memory !
i checked the memory and discovered that the swap file is NOT used at
all.
although
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday 17 November 2002 10:43 pm, Gerry Kirk wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I can't find any X Windows tool for changing grub settings. I want to
> delete entries for older kernels.
Xwindows tool?
Just open /etc/grub.conf in your favorite editor.
However, if yo
Is it really mounted read-only? i.e. what does "mount" tell you.
If it is not mounted read-only, then what permissions are applied to the
contents?
do
ls -l /mount/point/a_file_on_the_partition
Those are derived from mount options uid, umask etc.
Cameron.
> -Original Message-
> From: Ge
Uninstall the RPM's w/ rpm -e - there's a script that will remove the
entries when the rpm is uninstalled.
If you're using custom kernels, then use vi or pico or something like that
to make the changes.
-Rick
--
Rick Johnson, RHCE - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux/WAN Administrator - Medata, Inc. (from h
Hi,
i also got this problem.
discussing with colleagues, it seems that RH has not yet the possibility
to WRITE on NTFS partitions.
this would be possible by making a lot of modifications in the kernel
and recompile the whole, but a long task .
since XP is based on both NTFS format and FAT
On Sun, Nov 17, 2002 at 10:16:03PM -0600, Bret Hughes wrote:
> On Sun, 2002-11-17 at 09:48, Hal Burgiss wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 04:50:31PM -0800, Daevid Vincent wrote:
> >
> > > Procmail is the best, most useful program on my linux box. And bless
> > > you for that recepie ;-)
> >
> >
I need all newly created files within /var/spool/mail to be go-rw - is
there a way to do that? Right now, all newly created files within that
directory is ug+rw, and I have to manually go in and chmod them g-rw again. Is
there a way to have the permissions be correct when the file gets creat
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday 17 November 2002 11:13 pm, Bret Hughes wrote:
> On Sun, 2002-11-17 at 09:48, Hal Burgiss wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 04:50:31PM -0800, Daevid Vincent wrote:
> > > Procmail is the best, most useful program on my linux box. And
> > > ble
I want to have client , server database in redhat
for a IP Telephone system product,
it must be multi-user & ...
which one is better , Mysql or postgresql
?
On Sun, 2002-11-17 at 11:58, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> On Sun, 2002-11-17 at 00:45, Joshua Schmidlkofer wrote:
> > On Sat, 2002-11-16 at 14:42, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> > >
> > > It's probably a particularly bad idea to use the NVidia drivers on
> > > Psyche until NVidia provides a package that inclu
1 - 100 of 113 matches
Mail list logo
