On Monday 13 January 2003 07:00 am, you wrote:
>
> In short, yes you should install and use them all. They compliment each
> other.
>
> Gerry
Thank you. Since installing MailScanner less than 24 hours ago, it has
already been working hard.
I will install Razor and Spamassassin.
Irwin
--
> RH7.2, kernel-2.4.18-19.7, sendmail-8.11.6-3
>
> I installed MailScanner and F-Prot from the rpm's, and it seemed to go
> without any problem. Here is what I don't understand.
>
> Razor, spamsassassin, and MailScanner all seem to check for spam. Are
> they different and should all be used? If
On Sunday 12 January 2003 12:33 pm, you wrote:
~
> I suggest that you make sure you have your mail server working properly.
> Next install razor and then spamsassassin. Those should go in very easily.
> This will take care of flagging spam. Next you should check out
> MailScanner.
>
> Mai
Mailscanner - www.mailscanner.info You need your own Antivirus (e.g.,
Sophos, McAfee, F-Prot, etc). It also does SPAM.
Mike
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On
Behalf Of Michael George
Sent: Sunday, January 12, 2003 3:51 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subj
I have found that using Exiscan with Exim as well as the Sophie/Sophos
Antivirus combination on the relays has been a wonderful tool to stop
this virus menance. As well as using Spamassassin as a tool is wonderful
but I don't know how well Razor works anymore it used to be a big thing
but its now s
On Sun, 12 Jan 2003, Michael George wrote:
> I have a friend who has asked me to help them replace the Windoze2000 server
> in their office with a Linux system. While they aren't using 2000 as a mail
> server, they will be with Linux. They asked me about virus scanning incoming
> email on the se
