Re: RH62 can't log in [RESOLVED]

2003-01-16 Thread fred smith
On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 09:34:30AM -0600, Bret Hughes wrote: > On Thu, 2003-01-16 at 06:27, fred smith wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 07:34:18PM -0500, fred smith wrote: > > > I've got a 6.2 box at work (can't update yet because it's used for > > > development and customers run the result on 6.

Re: RH62 can't log in [RESOLVED]

2003-01-16 Thread Bret Hughes
On Thu, 2003-01-16 at 06:27, fred smith wrote: > On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 07:34:18PM -0500, fred smith wrote: > > Guys: > > > > I've got a 6.2 box at work (can't update yet because it's used for > > development and customers run the result on 6.2). > > > > today it paniced during shutdown (dunno w

Re: RH62 can't log in [RESOLVED]

2003-01-16 Thread fred smith
On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 07:34:18PM -0500, fred smith wrote: > Guys: > > I've got a 6.2 box at work (can't update yet because it's used for > development and customers run the result on 6.2). > > today it paniced during shutdown (dunno why either) and after the > massive fsck, some things are, lik

Re: RH62 can't log in

2003-01-15 Thread nlimbu
I had also same problem, but I didn't check it from GUI. It might be your different problem but in my case I just replaced the binary file 'login' from the other same version machine in single mode and then rebooted and it worked. With Regards Nabin Limbu System Administrator HealthNet Nepal O

Re: RH62 can't log in

2003-01-14 Thread fred smith
On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 05:34:12PM -0800, David Busby wrote: > Can you boot to single user to run different checks? > Yes, single user works, or logging in via GUI works. But so far I haven't figured out what is wrong. Clues would be gratefully accepted -- -

Re: RH62 can't log in

2003-01-14 Thread fred smith
On Wed, Jan 15, 2003 at 09:34:00AM +0800, Edward Dekkers wrote: > > I'm not being snotty saying it's been hacked - it's a fact of life these > > days. Stock 6.2 is not secure by any stretch of the imagination. There > > are holes in ftp, ssl, and a bunch of other places. > > Another scenario is

Re: RH62 can't log in

2003-01-14 Thread fred smith
On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 06:40:37PM -0600, Ed Wilts wrote: > On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 07:34:18PM -0500, fred smith wrote: > > Guys: > > > > I've got a 6.2 box at work (can't update yet because it's used for > > development and customers run the result on 6.2). > > If this system is unprotected on t

Re: RH62 can't log in

2003-01-14 Thread David Busby
Can you boot to single user to run different checks? /B - Original Message - From: "Edward Dekkers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 17:34 Subject: Re: RH62 can't log in > > I'm not being snotty saying

Re: RH62 can't log in

2003-01-14 Thread Edward Dekkers
> I'm not being snotty saying it's been hacked - it's a fact of life these > days. Stock 6.2 is not secure by any stretch of the imagination. There > are holes in ftp, ssl, and a bunch of other places. Another scenario is that your / partition is full. Regards, --- Edward Dekkers (Director) Tr

Re: RH62 can't log in

2003-01-14 Thread Ed Wilts
On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 07:34:18PM -0500, fred smith wrote: > Guys: > > I've got a 6.2 box at work (can't update yet because it's used for > development and customers run the result on 6.2). If this system is unprotected on the Internet than it's likely been hacked. You haven't given us much els