Re: redhat-devel definition

2000-10-27 Thread jfm2
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > > Well, I cant speak for anyone else, but I find the list only > partially useful. A long while back I asked what the exact > purpose of the list was for and got an answer to the effect that > the list is for people doing development, coding _OF_ Red Hat, > such a

Re: redhat-devel definition

2000-10-23 Thread Mike A. Harris
On Mon, 23 Oct 2000, Matt Fahrner wrote: >From the slew of messages about what "redhat-devel" should and shouldn't >be I still could divine exactly what is and what isn't supposed to be >here, nor could I get a clue by going to the list server. Can someone >enumerate exactly what should be posted

Re: redhat-devel definition

2000-10-23 Thread John Summerfield
> >From the slew of messages about what "redhat-devel" should and shouldn't > be I still could divine exactly what is and what isn't supposed to be > here, nor could I get a clue by going to the list server. Can someone > enumerate exactly what should be posted to this list (or point me to a > URL

Re: redhat-devel definition

2000-10-23 Thread Jag
On Mon, 23 Oct 2000, Matt Fahrner wrote: > >From the slew of messages about what "redhat-devel" should and shouldn't > be I still could divine exactly what is and what isn't supposed to be > here, nor could I get a clue by going to the list server. Can someone > enumerate exactly what should be p

redhat-devel definition

2000-10-23 Thread Matt Fahrner
>From the slew of messages about what "redhat-devel" should and shouldn't be I still could divine exactly what is and what isn't supposed to be here, nor could I get a clue by going to the list server. Can someone enumerate exactly what should be posted to this list (or point me to a URL that says