pland feature for rawhide,kernel

2002-06-24 Thread Knut J Bjuland
Are you in Redhat planing on including XFS support in rawhide kernel, since all other distributions support this file system now? ___ Redhat-devel-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-devel-list

Re: rawhide kernel

2002-01-30 Thread Eric Sandeen
On Wed, 2002-01-30 at 11:45, Hetz Ben Hamo wrote: > You mean IBM JFS? > > I wish there was some sort of convert tool between ext2 to other fs (like > reiser,JFS, XFS etc) - I have 300GB stuff on my hard drives here, so copying > it to other drive is a huge problems for me. Try http://tzukanov.

Re: rawhide kernel

2002-01-30 Thread Hetz Ben Hamo
est rawhide kernel work great with with my JFS boot partion. > Are you in RedHat going to include XFS also in RedHat linux tree ?I hope > so. ___ Redhat-devel-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-devel-list

rawhide kernel

2002-01-30 Thread Knut J Bjuland
Redhat latest rawhide kernel work great with with my JFS boot partion. Are you in RedHat going to include XFS also in RedHat linux tree ?I hope so.

current rawhide kernel

2002-01-30 Thread Needham, Douglas
Where could I find out more information about the latest/current rawhide kernel? Specifically I am curious about : 1) performance testing results 2) cerebrus results 3) what patches are applied against it 4) is anyone using it for non-testing purposes and if so what type of workload? Doug

Modules in Rawhide-Kernel

2001-01-21 Thread Daniel Hammer
BS"D Hi, could not compile any modules for 2.4.0-x kernels from rawhide. After 'make menukonfig' compiled with 'make dep clean bzImage' ... and everything went through successfully. But when it comes to compile any modules 'make modules' the compilations breaks. What went wrong? Thanx in advan

Re: rawhide kernel: raid soft problem

2001-01-05 Thread Pekka Savola
On Sat, 6 Jan 2001, redhat.angus wrote: > I cannot boot on the rawhide kernel-2.4.0-0.43.12.i586.rpm > on a box wich run on 2.2.16-22 from RedHat 7.0 in raid-0. > rpm -ivh kernel-2.4.0-0.43.12.i586.rpm > upgrade of kernel-utils from rawhide > idem for mkinitrd from rawhide >

rawhide kernel: raid soft problem

2001-01-05 Thread redhat.angus
I cannot boot on the rawhide kernel-2.4.0-0.43.12.i586.rpm on a box wich run on 2.2.16-22 from RedHat 7.0 in raid-0. rpm -ivh kernel-2.4.0-0.43.12.i586.rpm upgrade of kernel-utils from rawhide idem for mkinitrd from rawhide mkinitrd /boot/initrd-2.4.0-0.43.12.img 2.4.0-0.43.12.i586.rpm create an

Re: rawhide: kernel vs glibc

2000-10-08 Thread Matt Wilson
You're getting this kernel out of the preview/ directory? Any glibc package with ".2.4" at the end of the release is built without any support for kernels older than 2.4. This makes glibc faster, as it does not have to figure out what kernel is running to determine which kernel interfaces to use

Re: rawhide: kernel vs glibc

2000-10-08 Thread John Summerfield
> Thank you RH for updating the RawHide release. > > A few thoughts though: > > Trying to install the latest glibc (2.1.92-14.2.4) conflicts with the > kernel I'm currently running: 2.2.16. (Wont change to 2.4.0-pre until I've > resolved how to replace the masquerade setup in ipchains with iptab

Re: rawhide: kernel vs glibc

2000-10-08 Thread Svante Signell
I'm already running the rawhide kernels, currently 2.2.16-17 and 2.4.0-0.21. The glibc version is: glibc-2.1.92-5 One of the problems, see below, is that glibc-2.1.92-14.2.4 does not install when running the 2.2.16 kernel. Also now only glibc is built (both for i686 and i386), not as before (for i

Re: rawhide: kernel vs glibc

2000-10-08 Thread Pekka Savola
On Sun, 8 Oct 2000, Svante Signell wrote: > # rpm -Uvh > error: failed dependencies: > kernel < 2.4.0 conflicts with glibc-2.1.92-14.2.4 > > 2. Obviously there is a dependency between kernel header files and >glibc header files. Should this dependency rule out possibilities >to

rawhide: kernel vs glibc

2000-10-08 Thread Svante Signell
Thank you RH for updating the RawHide release. A few thoughts though: Trying to install the latest glibc (2.1.92-14.2.4) conflicts with the kernel I'm currently running: 2.2.16. (Wont change to 2.4.0-pre until I've resolved how to replace the masquerade setup in ipchains with iptables.) # rpm -

Re: [Redhat-devel-list] rawhide: kernel-2.2.16-1 does not build

2000-06-26 Thread Bernhard Rosenkraenzer
On Mon, 26 Jun 2000, Svante Signell wrote: > Kernel-2.1.16-1.src.rpm does not build: Get a newer kernel and preferrably an older compiler - 2.96 is currently too buggy to compile a kernel that works reliably. LLaP bero ___ Redhat-devel-list mailing

Re: [Redhat-devel-list] rawhide: kernel-2.2.16-1 does not build

2000-06-26 Thread Matt Wilson
On Mon, Jun 26, 2000 at 10:15:14PM +0200, Svante Signell wrote: > Kernel-2.1.6-1.src.rpm does not build: Yes, I thought we went over this. We know it doesn't build. It's rawhide. By the time we're done, everything will build. Here's the patch to make the kernel build, but good luck getting pa

[Redhat-devel-list] rawhide: kernel-2.2.16-1 does not build

2000-06-26 Thread Svante Signell
Kernel-2.1.6-1.src.rpm does not build: cc -D__KERNEL__ -I/usr/src/redhat/BUILD/linux/include -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -fno-strict-aliasing -D__SMP__ -pipe -fno-strength-reduce -m386 -DCPU=386 -DPARANOID -fno-builtin -DPARANOID -fno-builtin-c -o get_address.o ge

Re: Some rawhide kernel RPM changes to make a kernel-headers-smp subpkg

1999-09-07 Thread David Fox
David Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I see there are some changes to the current rawhide kernel RPM > (2.2.11-4) to deal with version specific header files. It doesn't > appear to deal with all the /usr/include/linux/module/*.ver files, > though. Ok, great, the l