[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> one more question: why wasn't kgcc used to build the kernel?
I've only ever use 2.95 on 2.4 kernels except once when I built on RH 7. I've
been using them since they were 2.3.something.
Someone at RH has been testing with 2.96 and had no problems.
If you want to use
Em Sexta 26 Janeiro 2001 15:52, you wrote:
> about kernel-headers-2.4.0-0.99.5:
> the include files should be in /usr/src/linux-2.4.0-0.99.5 and
> /usr/include/linux and /usr/include/asm should only be symlinks to
> /usr/src/linux/include/linux and /usr/src/linux/include/linux
>
> this way the ins
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> about kernel-headers-2.4.0-0.99.5: the include files should be in /usr/
> src/linux-2.4.0-0.99.5 and /usr/include/linux and /usr/include/asm
> should only be symlinks to /usr/src/linux/include/linux and /usr/src/
> linux/include/linux
This is why the practice of downl
On Friday, January 26 2001, Evandro Fernandes Giovanini said:
> about kernel-headers-2.4.0-0.99.5:
> the include files should be in /usr/src/linux-2.4.0-0.99.5 and
> /usr/include/linux and /usr/include/asm should only be symlinks to
> /usr/src/linux/include/linux and /usr/src/linux/include/linu
about kernel-headers-2.4.0-0.99.5:
the include files should be in /usr/src/linux-2.4.0-0.99.5 and
/usr/include/linux and /usr/include/asm should only be symlinks to
/usr/src/linux/include/linux and /usr/src/linux/include/linux
this way the installation of a custom kernel would be a lot easier.
with the last snapshot, I got that on boot 4 dependenties unfound, one about
atm for example is it normal ??
--
To unsubscribe:
mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] < /dev/null
