For the last several weeks, most of the fonts in Rawhide have looked
pretty ugly. Spacing between letters is weird, letters are "chunky" and
not smooth looking, etc. I am just wondering -- is this something that
is likely to be peculiar to my setup, or is there something going on
wit
. I have no idea what comes out of the box
>>
>>
>
>Speaking of that, i have a little annoying problem.
>It's small indeed, but annoying also.
>
>With RH 7.2, gnome-terminal could be configured regarding the fonts so
>that the size of the default 80x25 window was alm
at, i have a little annoying problem.
It's small indeed, but annoying also.
With RH 7.2, gnome-terminal could be configured regarding the fonts so
that the size of the default 80x25 window was almost exactly 1/4 of the
size of my 1024x768 screen. That allowed me to have 4 non-overlapping
non-resize
>|>u> The real problem has not been the lack of AA but the pathetic fonts
>|>u> included with a lot of distros. ie Redhat 7.3 (and I'll never forgive
>|>u> them for this) had the worst fonts possible.
>|>
>|To my knowledge Red Hat used the same fonts
On Thu, 2002-07-18 at 06:45, Bob Tennent wrote:
> >|[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> >|> And the fix? All you had to do was reorder the font list in
> >|> XF86Config.
> >|
> >|
> >|
> >|Change from what to what different, and what kind of difference is that
> >|supposed to make?
>
> Putting :u
On Thu, Jul 18, 2002 at 09:59:49AM -0500, Thomas Dodd wrote:
>
> Atul Sowani wrote:
>
> >A lot of people are indeed going for slackware 8.1!
> >
> What do Slackware doe for improving the fonts?
And what does "a lot of people" mean? Who? If this mass migrati
Atul Sowani wrote:
>A lot of people are indeed going for slackware 8.1!
>
>
What do Slackware doe for improving the fonts?
>On 17 Jul 2002 10:40 -0700, Florin Andrei wrote:
>
>u> I'm reading this article on OSNews:
>u>
>u> http://www.osnews.com/sto
>|[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
>|> And the fix? All you had to do was reorder the font list in
>|> XF86Config.
>|
>|
>|
>|Change from what to what different, and what kind of difference is that
>|supposed to make?
Putting :unscaled font directories first, followed by outline-font
directories
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> And the fix? All you had to do was reorder the font list in
> XF86Config.
Change from what to what different, and what kind of difference is that
supposed to make?
AL
___
Redhat-devel-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTEC
##
u> The real problem has not been the lack of AA but the pathetic fonts
u> included with a lot of distros. ie Redhat 7.3 (and I'll never forgive
u> them for this) had the worst fonts possible. Using Mozilla was a
u> nightmare. And the fix? All you had to do was reorde
I'm reading this article on OSNews:
http://www.osnews.com/story.php?news_id=1365
One of the comments says this:
#
The real problem has not been the lack of AA but the pathetic fonts
included with a lot of distros. ie Redhat 7.3 (and I'll nev
-misc-SimHei-bold-i-normal--0-0-0-0-c-0-gb2312.1980-0
So must add CJK truetype path for xtt and xtt module in
/etc/X11/XF86Config-4 when install with CJK languages.
Section "Files"
...
FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/TrueType"
EndSection
# Module loading section
Sect
Dear, all
I want to change Thai fonts in anacona 7.0.91. Any
one have solution, please tell me.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail.
http://personal.mail.yahoo.com
Can someone tell me of the pedigree of the funts used in
urw-fonts-2.0-4.rpm ? Did they come from www.gimp.org ? And if not why
do the filenames match so closely, but not the name of the font
descriptions.
from /home/gat/URW/URW/fonts.scale I have
a010013l.pfb -Adobe-Avantgarde-book-r-normal
On Mon Nov 01 1999 at 15:49, Riyad Kalla wrote:
> When I am in X, at 1600x1200 with a Matrox Mill2 AGP, and a
> 19" Viewsonic G790, smaller fonts that would otherwise look
> fine underwindows (about a 10pt or 12pt courier) are
> indistinguisably blurry, its starting to REALLY
> When I am in X, at 1600x1200 with a Matrox Mill2 AGP, and a
> 19" Viewsonic G790, smaller fonts that would otherwise look
> fine underwindows (about a 10pt or 12pt courier) are
> indistinguisably blurry, its starting to REALLY bother my
It normally means you are overdriving th
When I am in X, at 1600x1200 with a Matrox Mill2 AGP, and a
19" Viewsonic G790, smaller fonts that would otherwise look
fine underwindows (about a 10pt or 12pt courier) are
indistinguisably blurry, its starting to REALLY bother my
eyes, and I was curious how I could correct this
blurryne
: Shouldn't be possible,
for me to set this value ( 120 ), to another
highest value ( 160, for example ), in order
to augment the True Type fonts geometry?
Is it needed to run another program
for the changes be effective?
Thanks.
Jean Francois
--
To unsubscribe:
mail -s unsubscribe [
18 matches
Mail list logo
