/XFree86-4.0
+ ln -f xterm nxterm
ln: xterm: No such file or directory
Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.48651 (%install)
--
To unsubscribe:
mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] < /dev/null
>
> First, my comments extend from other issues and are not specific to the
> XFree86 releases, but to most packages overall. I have noticed a trend
> with Mandrake, or so it appears and if I am wrong being shown how I am
> wrong will definitely go a long way to changing my opinion(s). I also
>
your question, but it looks like my mail server is hoarding
about half the messages in the thread to deliver in a month or so
(!#%^ ATHM!) much like it has the preceeding pissing contest.
At 18:29 3/14/00 +0100, Bernhard Rosenkraenzer wrote:
>For those who complained, XFree86 4.0 packages are
> know the rules as well as I do. These are *MY* opinions and are
> therefore seperate from Red Hat. Did I post from a Red Hat account? No,
Settle down folks.
You DID sound like a Red Hat person, and you DID claim Red Hat allegiance.
I've seen people clearly representing another company doing
Vandoorselaere Yoann wrote:
>
> Ohh, Unreal Tournament run fine on many machine that i know including
> debian and mandrake, i suppose it run fine on redhat too.
>
It's been installed on 3 PII 400 to 450s with 128MB Of RAM, and 2 AMD
k6-2 333 and 400s They all puke with "Segmenation Fault (co
I apologize. I forgot to give the URL.
http://www.delorie.com/djgpp/
--
David D.W. Downey - Red Hat Technical Engineer
Assistant Site Manager - http://www.linuxnewbie.com
Resume - http://www.brainbench.com/transcript.jsp?pid=96113
--
To unsubscribe:
mail -s unsubscribe
Brian Patterson wrote:
>
> Whats DJGPP?
DJGPP is the DOS port of GCC. It aslso has G++, Fortran, LISP, and
Pascal IIRC.
Also, there is B20 (now B21 I believe) for writing Windows apps using
GCC)
--
David D.W. Downey - Red Hat Technical Engineer
Assistant Site Manager -
"David D.W. Downey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
This is my last mail on this topic.
>
> Yes, it is out of line. I run a hybrid network here consisting of
> Win98SE clients, Windows 2000 clients and Red Hat Linux 6.1 servers
> handling mail, LDAP, NIS, NFS, Sybase, mysql, and PostgreSQL. The wi
> Ohh and is this also out of line ?
>
> This is your sent mail headers :
>
> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (Win98; I)
> X-Accept-Language: en
> MIME-Version: 1.0
>
Yes, it is out of line. I run a hybrid network here consisting of
Win98SE clients, Windows 2000 c
Arright. Take this "who whizzed in whose wheaties" somewhere else.
Neither of you are making your respective companies look any better
doing this, and I'm getting personally embarrased to say I'm a RH
user.
But the question still stands - what's the timeline for 4.0?
I downloaded the non-packag
"David D.W. Downey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >
> > Wooa,
> > for a Microsoft certified person i think you say more than you know :
> >
>
> It's just a cert. Just a cert. Do I work for microsoft? No. Therefore
> THIS comment is out of line as well. And you claim, *I'M* fighting the
> co
> That's you who started the debate...
> feel free to continue mailling me in private.
>
OK, let us continue this in private.
> A statement of experience ?
> Are you kidding ?
I'll ignore that.
>
> I think you have not so many mandrake experience to say such a thing.
> (quoting you : mandr
"David D.W. Downey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > First,
>
> > So, we do far more than compiling them.
> >
> I will not address the first, since this will lend to a long and drawn
> out debate covering many different issues that are better served outside
> of a public forum.
That's you who
Frederic Lepied wrote:
>
> "David D.W. Downey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Most likely not. Mandrake doesn't thoroughly test everything before
> > releasing it. If it compiles that's all they care about.
> >
>
> What makes you said that ? Every release of XFree86 that I have done
> has
> First,
> So, we do far more than compiling them.
>
I will not address the first, since this will lend to a long and drawn
out debate covering many different issues that are better served outside
of a public forum.
> Second,
> we do not insult redhat on our list, please be polite and do so.
"David D.W. Downey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Most likely not. Mandrake doesn't thoroughly test everything before
> releasing it. If it compiles that's all they care about.
First,
we have 2 dedicated XFree developper doing our X package
and one of them is working full time on X.
They are
"David D.W. Downey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Most likely not. Mandrake doesn't thoroughly test everything before
> releasing it. If it compiles that's all they care about.
>
What makes you said that ? Every release of XFree86 that I have done
has been tested.
> I know for a fact that Red
Most likely not. Mandrake doesn't thoroughly test everything before
releasing it. If it compiles that's all they care about.
I know for a fact that Red Hat tests their RPMs before releasing them.
If they come in for contrib, then you are usually on your own as to
whether they work or not.
[EMA
I noticed on
http://rufus.w3.org/linux/RPM/XByName.html
That the new xfree RPMs are available for Mandrake
Are there any yet for RedHat?
Kevin
--
To unsubscribe:
mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] < /dev/null
19 matches
Mail list logo
