Re: X Windows in 6.2 is VERY fragile!

2000-06-21 Thread JF Martinez
> > > > My question iswhen X Windows starts doing this, how the hell do we > > > debug it? > > > > look at the :0.log file in /var/gdm > > THANK YOU! It was complaining about not being able to connect to some > socket. I found the socket in /tmp; it looked like an old copy. I > removed a

Re: X Windows in 6.2 is VERY fragile!

2000-06-20 Thread Chris Pinnock
On Tue, Jun 20, 2000 at 10:33:05AM -0700, Steven Boswell wrote: > But I can't get X Windows to work reliably in 6.2! (I don't remember > having ANYWHERE this much trouble with X Windows in previous Red Hat > releases.) When I start it, it looks like it's trying to start X > Windows, fails, and t

Re: X Windows in 6.2 is VERY fragile!

2000-06-20 Thread Andrew E. Mileski
Steven Boswell wrote: > THANK YOU! It was complaining about not being able to connect to some > socket. I found the socket in /tmp; it looked like an old copy. I > removed all the old X-related stuff from /tmp (e.g. .X11-Unix, > .ICE-Unix, .font-unix, and a few others), and now X Windows will s

Re: X Windows in 6.2 is VERY fragile!

2000-06-20 Thread Steven Boswell
> > My question iswhen X Windows starts doing this, how the hell do we > > debug it? > > look at the :0.log file in /var/gdm THANK YOU! It was complaining about not being able to connect to some socket. I found the socket in /tmp; it looked like an old copy. I removed all the old X-relate

Re: X Windows in 6.2 is VERY fragile!

2000-06-20 Thread Matt Fahrner
This can happen if you "su" to root using a user id that is separate from root but uses the same home directory. For instance instead of sharing root we give out individual root. For instance mine reads: rootmf:x:0:0:Super Matt Fahrner:/home/matt:/bin/csh If I "su" under certain circumstance

Re: X Windows in 6.2 is VERY fragile!

2000-06-20 Thread Jonathan Sailor
Bootup in runlevel 3. eg: LILO boot: linux 3 --- "Eric H. Majzoub" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 20 Jun 2000, Steven Boswell wrote: > > > releases.) When I start it, it looks like it's > trying to start X > > Windows, fails, and then loops back and tries to > do it again. So it > > just

Re: X Windows in 6.2 is VERY fragile!

2000-06-20 Thread Eric H. Majzoub
On Tue, 20 Jun 2000, Steven Boswell wrote: > releases.) When I start it, it looks like it's trying to start X > Windows, fails, and then loops back and tries to do it again. So it > just gets itself into a loop where it constantly fails, and there's no > way to stop it. Even worse, I can't swi

Re: X Windows in 6.2 is VERY fragile!

2000-06-20 Thread Wesley Griffin
* Steven Boswell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [06/20/00 14:00]: > My question iswhen X Windows starts doing this, how the hell do we > debug it? look at the :0.log file in /var/gdm I've had this happen on 3 different boxes over the last 2-3 weeks. they're development machines, so they get rebooted con

Re: X Windows in 6.2 is VERY fragile!

2000-06-20 Thread Jag
On Tue, 20 Jun 2000, Steven Boswell wrote: > My question iswhen X Windows starts doing this, how the hell do we > debug it? Switch your run level to 3. This way X won't start automatically. Log in on the console, and 'startx' to see why X isn't starting correctly. The behavior you gave is

RE: X Windows in 6.2 is VERY fragile!

2000-06-20 Thread Steven Lord
-Original Message- From: Steven Boswell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 20 June 2000 18:33 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: X Windows in 6.2 is VERY fragile! I've been running RedHat 6.2 for a few months now (and I've been running Red Hat Linux in general for several years now)

X Windows in 6.2 is VERY fragile!

2000-06-20 Thread Steven Boswell
I've been running RedHat 6.2 for a few months now (and I've been running Red Hat Linux in general for several years now). I've got it running on three machines; two of them have X Windows installed. But I can't get X Windows to work reliably in 6.2! (I don't remember having ANYWHERE this much t