Re: SegFault with -fstack-check

2003-07-07 Thread John
On Mon, 7 Jul 2003, John wrote: > On Mon, 7 Jul 2003, Leonard den Ottolander wrote: > > > Hi Sean, > > > > > So it seems to be "distro" relatedhmmm... > > > > Well, compiler version related (but afaik only Red Hat ships the gcc-2.96 > > compiler). On my Red Hat 7.3 system the error also i

Re: SegFault with -fstack-check

2003-07-07 Thread John
On Mon, 7 Jul 2003, Michael Schwendt wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Mon, 7 Jul 2003 02:24:38 +0200, Leonard den Ottolander wrote: > > > Hi Sean, > > > > > So it seems to be "distro" relatedhmmm... > > > > Well, compiler version related (but afaik only Red

Re: SegFault with -fstack-check

2003-07-07 Thread Michael Schwendt
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, 7 Jul 2003 02:24:38 +0200, Leonard den Ottolander wrote: > Hi Sean, > > > So it seems to be "distro" relatedhmmm... > > Well, compiler version related (but afaik only Red Hat ships the gcc-2.96 > compiler). On my Red Hat 7.3 system the

Re: SegFault with -fstack-check

2003-07-06 Thread John
On Mon, 7 Jul 2003, Leonard den Ottolander wrote: > Hi Sean, > > > So it seems to be "distro" relatedhmmm... > > Well, compiler version related (but afaik only Red Hat ships the gcc-2.96 > compiler). On my Red Hat 7.3 system the error also is reproducible. You should I had a mate check o

Re: SegFault with -fstack-check

2003-07-06 Thread John
On Mon, 7 Jul 2003, Leonard den Ottolander wrote: > Hi Sean, > > > So it seems to be "distro" relatedhmmm... > > Well, compiler version related (but afaik only Red Hat ships the gcc-2.96 > compiler). On my Red Hat 7.3 system the error also is reproducible. You should > probably report a b

Re: SegFault with -fstack-check

2003-07-06 Thread Leonard den Ottolander
Hi Sean, > So it seems to be "distro" relatedhmmm... Well, compiler version related (but afaik only Red Hat ships the gcc-2.96 compiler). On my Red Hat 7.3 system the error also is reproducible. You should probably report a bug at http://bugzilla.redhat.com . By the way, if you need stac

Re: SegFault with -fstack-check

2003-07-06 Thread John
On 6 Jul 2003, Sean Bruno wrote: > So it seems to be "distro" relatedhmmm... > I don't have a RHL 8.0 or 9 system to test on. If you can take the time, build gcc (the most likely candidate) from the tarball contained in the src.rpm and see whether that has the problem. The spec file contains

Re: SegFault with -fstack-check

2003-07-06 Thread Sean Bruno
So it seems to be "distro" relatedhmmm... Anyone from Red-Hat wanna' chime in on this one? On Sun, 2003-07-06 at 15:52, John wrote: > On 6 Jul 2003, Sean Bruno wrote: > > > I have been troubleshooting an issue with a multi-threaded application > > port from Solaris X86 to Linux. > > > > It

Re: SegFault with -fstack-check

2003-07-06 Thread John
On 6 Jul 2003, Sean Bruno wrote: > I have been troubleshooting an issue with a multi-threaded application > port from Solaris X86 to Linux. > > It was randomly dumping core on "main" or other random parts of code. > > After hacking on the issue for about a week, I decided to write a little > hel

SegFault with -fstack-check

2003-07-06 Thread Sean Bruno
I have been troubleshooting an issue with a multi-threaded application port from Solaris X86 to Linux. It was randomly dumping core on "main" or other random parts of code. After hacking on the issue for about a week, I decided to write a little hello world program and compile it with the same op