Re: rawhide kernel

2002-01-30 Thread Eric Sandeen
On Wed, 2002-01-30 at 11:45, Hetz Ben Hamo wrote: > You mean IBM JFS? > > I wish there was some sort of convert tool between ext2 to other fs (like > reiser,JFS, XFS etc) - I have 300GB stuff on my hard drives here, so copying > it to other drive is a huge problems for me. Try http://tzukanov.

Re: rawhide kernel

2002-01-30 Thread Hetz Ben Hamo
You mean IBM JFS? I wish there was some sort of convert tool between ext2 to other fs (like reiser,JFS, XFS etc) - I have 300GB stuff on my hard drives here, so copying it to other drive is a huge problems for me. Hetz On Wednesday 30 January 2002 19:26, Knut J Bjuland wrote: > Redhat latest

Re: rawhide kernel: raid soft problem

2001-01-05 Thread Pekka Savola
On Sat, 6 Jan 2001, redhat.angus wrote: > I cannot boot on the rawhide kernel-2.4.0-0.43.12.i586.rpm > on a box wich run on 2.2.16-22 from RedHat 7.0 in raid-0. > rpm -ivh kernel-2.4.0-0.43.12.i586.rpm > upgrade of kernel-utils from rawhide > idem for mkinitrd from rawhide > > mkinitrd /boot/initr

Re: rawhide: kernel vs glibc

2000-10-08 Thread Matt Wilson
You're getting this kernel out of the preview/ directory? Any glibc package with ".2.4" at the end of the release is built without any support for kernels older than 2.4. This makes glibc faster, as it does not have to figure out what kernel is running to determine which kernel interfaces to use

Re: rawhide: kernel vs glibc

2000-10-08 Thread John Summerfield
> Thank you RH for updating the RawHide release. > > A few thoughts though: > > Trying to install the latest glibc (2.1.92-14.2.4) conflicts with the > kernel I'm currently running: 2.2.16. (Wont change to 2.4.0-pre until I've > resolved how to replace the masquerade setup in ipchains with iptab

Re: rawhide: kernel vs glibc

2000-10-08 Thread Svante Signell
I'm already running the rawhide kernels, currently 2.2.16-17 and 2.4.0-0.21. The glibc version is: glibc-2.1.92-5 One of the problems, see below, is that glibc-2.1.92-14.2.4 does not install when running the 2.2.16 kernel. Also now only glibc is built (both for i686 and i386), not as before (for i

Re: rawhide: kernel vs glibc

2000-10-08 Thread Pekka Savola
On Sun, 8 Oct 2000, Svante Signell wrote: > # rpm -Uvh > error: failed dependencies: > kernel < 2.4.0 conflicts with glibc-2.1.92-14.2.4 > > 2. Obviously there is a dependency between kernel header files and >glibc header files. Should this dependency rule out possibilities >to