On Sat, Oct 07, 2000 at 12:44:42PM -0500, Chris Abbey wrote:
> Matt, in other words you do not expect 7.0 to be used for
> production purposes, correct?
No, I'm saying that the C side of the compiler is quite good, but the
ABI for C++ is not. If you are developing proprietary software and
you ar
Chris Abbey wrote:
> Matt, in other words you do not expect 7.0 to be used for
> production purposes, correct?
>
> For those that don't fully understand the impact of RedHat's
> decision, please read the statement from the GCC Steering
> Committee: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-announce/2000/msg3
Matt, in other words you do not expect 7.0 to be used for
production purposes, correct?
For those that don't fully understand the impact of RedHat's
decision, please read the statement from the GCC Steering
Committee: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-announce/2000/msg3.html
now the forces of openn
Matt Wilson wrote:
> We are supporting the compiler we shipped in Red Hat Linux 7. If you
> can add a bugzilla report with trimmed down test case of the code that
> causes the error, we will do our best to get it fixed.
>
> Follow the instructions at http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html but enter the
>
We are supporting the compiler we shipped in Red Hat Linux 7. If you
can add a bugzilla report with trimmed down test case of the code that
causes the error, we will do our best to get it fixed.
Follow the instructions at http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html but enter the
bug in bugzilla at http://bugzi
