> [John Summerfield]
> > Can this compile safely be used for compiling everything?
> >
> > I'm most concerned about kernels (2.2 and 2.3), but I compile quite a lot
> > of other stuff here.
>
> The official stance (last time I saw Alan write on the subject) was
> that 2.95.x tickles kernel bugs
[John Summerfield]
> > The official stance (last time I saw Alan write on the subject) was
> > that 2.95.x tickles kernel bugs that egcs 1.1.2 and gcc 2.7.2.3 don't,
> > so as of yet kernels are still best compiled with older compilers.
>
> Compile-time? or do they show at run-time?
The only thi
> [John Summerfield]
> > Can this compile safely be used for compiling everything?
> >
> > I'm most concerned about kernels (2.2 and 2.3), but I compile quite a lot
> > of other stuff here.
>
> The official stance (last time I saw Alan write on the subject) was
> that 2.95.x tickles kernel bugs
[John Summerfield]
> Can this compile safely be used for compiling everything?
>
> I'm most concerned about kernels (2.2 and 2.3), but I compile quite a lot
> of other stuff here.
The official stance (last time I saw Alan write on the subject) was
that 2.95.x tickles kernel bugs that egcs 1.1.2
