Re: fsck Errors

2000-02-25 Thread Alan Cox
> > No journalling fs is in 2.3.x or likely to be in 2.4 > When is it likely to be incorporated? In the real kernel tree - 2.5.x Expect vendors to ship stuff before then though. > > ext3 is at ftp.linux.org.uk:/pub/linux/sct > > This? > ftp://ftp.linux.org.uk/pub/linux/sct/fs/ext3-0.0.2c.tar.g

Re: fsck Errors

2000-02-25 Thread John Summerfield
> > Where is ext3? It does not show up on my filesystem list (2.3.47). Nor can > > I see it at ftp.au.kernel.org > > No journalling fs is in 2.3.x or likely to be in 2.4 When is it likely to be incorporated? > > ext3 is at ftp.linux.org.uk:/pub/linux/sct This? ftp://ftp.linux.org.uk/pub/lin

Re: fsck Errors

2000-02-24 Thread Alan Cox
> Where is ext3? It does not show up on my filesystem list (2.3.47). Nor can > I see it at ftp.au.kernel.org No journalling fs is in 2.3.x or likely to be in 2.4 ext3 is at ftp.linux.org.uk:/pub/linux/sct -- To unsubscribe: mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] < /dev/null

Re: fsck Errors

2000-02-24 Thread John Summerfield
> > and IBM's porting its jfs to Linux; I don't know just how far along it is, > > ext3 works, tested on Linux > > > but id does have enough to brag about. As it's proven technology (comes > > from AIX and is also used on OS/2) I expect the work to be done reasonably > > quickly. > > Work ma

Re: fsck Errors

2000-02-23 Thread Alan Cox
> I see ext3, coda, reiserfs, gfs, but I don't know what is the "priority" > list (sorted by stableness, good design, features). The all solve different problems. GFS is a shared disk fs Reiserfs is designed for performance and to handle small files well and journalled ext3 is format com

Re: fsck Errors

2000-02-23 Thread Levente Farkas
Alan Cox wrote: > > but id does have enough to brag about. As it's proven technology (comes > > from AIX and is also used on OS/2) I expect the work to be done reasonably > > quickly. > > Work maybe, but its not proven until it works for a while under load under > Linux. That will take time. ext3

Re: fsck Errors

2000-02-23 Thread Alan Cox
> and IBM's porting its jfs to Linux; I don't know just how far along it is, ext3 works, tested on Linux > but id does have enough to brag about. As it's proven technology (comes > from AIX and is also used on OS/2) I expect the work to be done reasonably > quickly. Work maybe, but its not p

Re: fsck Errors

2000-02-23 Thread John Summerfield
> > My question is how can I get around this manual intervention in the field. > > Should I replace the logic where "sulogin" gets called with my own logic? > > What is the best way to do this? There will be no keyboard attached to the > > system. > > #2. Get the ext3fs journalling beta and test i

Re: fsck Errors

2000-02-22 Thread Alan Cox
> My question is how can I get around this manual intervention in the field. > Should I replace the logic where "sulogin" gets called with my own logic? > What is the best way to do this? There will be no keyboard attached to the > system. Two answers here; #1. Bypass the logic and always force