> > No journalling fs is in 2.3.x or likely to be in 2.4
> When is it likely to be incorporated?
In the real kernel tree - 2.5.x
Expect vendors to ship stuff before then though.
> > ext3 is at ftp.linux.org.uk:/pub/linux/sct
>
> This?
> ftp://ftp.linux.org.uk/pub/linux/sct/fs/ext3-0.0.2c.tar.g
> > Where is ext3? It does not show up on my filesystem list (2.3.47). Nor can
> > I see it at ftp.au.kernel.org
>
> No journalling fs is in 2.3.x or likely to be in 2.4
When is it likely to be incorporated?
>
> ext3 is at ftp.linux.org.uk:/pub/linux/sct
This?
ftp://ftp.linux.org.uk/pub/lin
> Where is ext3? It does not show up on my filesystem list (2.3.47). Nor can
> I see it at ftp.au.kernel.org
No journalling fs is in 2.3.x or likely to be in 2.4
ext3 is at ftp.linux.org.uk:/pub/linux/sct
--
To unsubscribe:
mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] < /dev/null
> > and IBM's porting its jfs to Linux; I don't know just how far along it is,
>
> ext3 works, tested on Linux
>
> > but id does have enough to brag about. As it's proven technology (comes
> > from AIX and is also used on OS/2) I expect the work to be done reasonably
> > quickly.
>
> Work ma
> I see ext3, coda, reiserfs, gfs, but I don't know what is the "priority"
> list (sorted by stableness, good design, features).
The all solve different problems.
GFS is a shared disk fs
Reiserfs is designed for performance and to handle small files well and
journalled
ext3 is format com
Alan Cox wrote:
> > but id does have enough to brag about. As it's proven technology (comes
> > from AIX and is also used on OS/2) I expect the work to be done reasonably
> > quickly.
>
> Work maybe, but its not proven until it works for a while under load under
> Linux. That will take time. ext3
> and IBM's porting its jfs to Linux; I don't know just how far along it is,
ext3 works, tested on Linux
> but id does have enough to brag about. As it's proven technology (comes
> from AIX and is also used on OS/2) I expect the work to be done reasonably
> quickly.
Work maybe, but its not p
> > My question is how can I get around this manual intervention in the field.
> > Should I replace the logic where "sulogin" gets called with my own logic?
> > What is the best way to do this? There will be no keyboard attached to the
> > system.
>
> #2. Get the ext3fs journalling beta and test i
> My question is how can I get around this manual intervention in the field.
> Should I replace the logic where "sulogin" gets called with my own logic?
> What is the best way to do this? There will be no keyboard attached to the
> system.
Two answers here;
#1. Bypass the logic and always force