That's right--this is for several hundred machines, which is why I want it to
be completely deterministic as well as noninvasive to the hardware.
>From Kevin McConnell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Tue, Feb 04, 2003 at 10:20:49AM -0800:
>
> --- John <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > As I understand it, he's
On Tue, 4 Feb 2003, Kevin McConnell wrote:
>
> --- John <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > As I understand it, he's trying to control which NIC
> > is used to install.
> > Reoving support for other NICs does not affect
> > what's used later.
> >
> > Then, he can fiddle with /etc/modules.conf if
> >
--- John <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As I understand it, he's trying to control which NIC
> is used to install.
> Reoving support for other NICs does not affect
> what's used later.
>
> Then, he can fiddle with /etc/modules.conf if
> necessary.
>
> I personally would simply plug the cable into
On Thu, 30 Jan 2003, Kevin McConnell wrote:
>
> --- John <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Removing the modules for the NICs you don't want to
> > use will force the
> > issue;-)
>
> I thought he was trying to designate which card he
> wants to be eth0, eth1, etc... so that he can plug
> each devic
--- John <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Removing the modules for the NICs you don't want to
> use will force the
> issue;-)
I thought he was trying to designate which card he
wants to be eth0, eth1, etc... so that he can plug
each device into multiple networks/and or designate
which device should r
On Wed, 29 Jan 2003, Lars Damerow wrote:
> >From Kevin McConnell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 11:32:44AM -0800:
> >
> > --- Lars Damerow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >From Kevin McConnell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Wed, Jan
> > > 29, 2003 at 11:13:23AM -0800:
> > > >
> > > > This is j
On Wed, 29 Jan 2003, Kevin McConnell wrote:
>
> --- Lars Damerow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Is there any way I can make the device naming more
> > clear?
>
> This is just something to get your mind working. I
> know there is a way to pass options to modules as
> they're loaded. Using the IR
>From Kevin McConnell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 11:32:44AM -0800:
>
> --- Lars Damerow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >From Kevin McConnell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Wed, Jan
> > 29, 2003 at 11:13:23AM -0800:
> > >
> > > This is just something to get your mind working. I
> > > know the
--- Lars Damerow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >From Kevin McConnell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Wed, Jan
> 29, 2003 at 11:13:23AM -0800:
> >
> > This is just something to get your mind working. I
> > know there is a way to pass options to modules as
> > they're loaded. Using the IRQ and base address,
>
>From Kevin McConnell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 11:13:23AM -0800:
>
> This is just something to get your mind working. I
> know there is a way to pass options to modules as
> they're loaded. Using the IRQ and base address,
> couldn't one conceivably assign eth0 to be one and
That
--- Lars Damerow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there any way I can make the device naming more
> clear?
This is just something to get your mind working. I
know there is a way to pass options to modules as
they're loaded. Using the IRQ and base address,
couldn't one conceivably assign eth0 to b
11 matches
Mail list logo
