> On Mon, Jul 24, 2000 at 12:09:31PM +0200, Bernhard Rosenkraenzer wrote:
> > > What about the regular ssh?
> >
> > No way. Its license sucks and it doesn't have any advantages over
> > current versions of OpenSSH.
>
> It has. It's long out in the field.
Since they represent forks of the same o
On Mon, 24 Jul 2000, Chris Abbey wrote:
>Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2000 16:44:21 -0500
>From: Chris Abbey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: OpenSSH/SSL
>
>At 13:25 7/24/00 +0200, Daniel Roesen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>It has. It's long
At 13:25 7/24/00 +0200, Daniel Roesen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>It has. It's long out in the field.
umm... ok, like what for instance? I spent about two weeks doing a comparison
and I couldn't find anything in ssh that OpenSSH didn't do, I'm curious what
I missed.
now the forces of openness
On Mon, 24 Jul 2000, Bernhard Rosenkraenzer wrote:
>Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2000 12:09:31 +0200 (CEST)
>From: Bernhard Rosenkraenzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: OpenSSH/SSL
>
>On Mon, 24 Jul 2000, Mike A. Harris wrote:
>
>> Any consideratio
On Mon, Jul 24, 2000 at 12:09:31PM +0200, Bernhard Rosenkraenzer wrote:
> > What about the regular ssh?
>
> No way. Its license sucks and it doesn't have any advantages over
> current versions of OpenSSH.
It has. It's long out in the field.
Best regards,
Daniel (still using ssh 1.2.27)
On Mon, 24 Jul 2000, Mike A. Harris wrote:
> Any consideration being made of including OpenSSH and OpenSSL to
> RawHide?
The RSA patent still prevents us from doing this - but fortunately it will
be expiring later this year.
Right now, check ftp://ftp.redhat.de/pub/rh-addons/security.
> What a
On Mon, 24 Jul 2000, Mike A. Harris wrote:
> Any consideration being made of including OpenSSH and OpenSSL to
> RawHide? What about the regular ssh? Since the crypto relaxo
> has occured, and there are now crypto products in RH, it would be
> nice to have SSH included by default as well as SSL.
