On 2002-07-10, Riku Meskanen wrote:
RM> > http://www.lartc.org was the first I did think of.
RM> >
RM> Ok, it was _a_ joke (LART part if you did not get it),
RM> but the issue more important is _what is the relevance_
RM> linking another moderated mailing list with different
RM> topic to redhat-
On Wed, 10 Jul 2002, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On 2002-07-10, Riku Meskanen wrote:
>
> RM> What is this? Somebody attached his own list to redhat-devel...
>
> http://www.lartc.org was the first I did think of.
>
Ok, it was _a_ joke (LART part if you did not get it),
but the issue more important i
On 2002-07-10, Riku Meskanen wrote:
RM> What is this? Somebody attached his own list to redhat-devel...
RM>
RM> I couldn't mind less, but the list name LARTC? I'm sure
RM> (almost) everybody knows what the LART is and darn if we
RM> get struck by LART -- then something is badly wrong ;)
RM>
RM>
> I think the cost of dumping Clearcase is so high that no individual
> project can afford to do it. So no one does. So you're stuck with it
> forever. In practice, the issue of it being a sunk cost never enters the
> discussion.
"It's never too late to throw out all the code and start over."
Pr
I think the cost of dumping Clearcase is so high that no individual
project can afford to do it. So no one does. So you're stuck with it
forever. In practice, the issue of it being a sunk cost never enters the
discussion.
The problem is that Clearcase is integrated into your builds, into
develope
>
> When your organization has a sunk cost, it's wise to recognize it as early
> as possible and move on. True, as a technical person it can be difficult
> to deal with situations like this because often management doesn't
> consider seriously the business acumen of technical people. But, honest
> "JOO" == James Olin Oden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> JOO> As it is though the current company I am working with has
> JOO> invested heavily in clearcase and so any solution would require
> JOO> it.
>
> Vladimir G. Ivanovic http://leonora.org/~vladimir:
> Precisely. Once yo
"JOO" == James Olin Oden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
JOO> As it is though the current company I am working with has
JOO> invested heavily in clearcase and so any solution would require
JOO> it.
Precisely. Once you start with ClearCase, you're effectively locked into
a costly, proprietary s
I do believe that the international price for rh boxes should be plain,
cause, after all, we pay for the support, not for the product itself,
isn't that?
If I'm not right, next month I'll come in US and start living a better
life there... or ...
--
Spooky
Mario Torre wrote:
>On Tuesday 30 Ap
On Tuesday 30 April 2002 22:11, Thomas Dodd wrote:
> Fuel pricers are higher with higher taxes in europe. But you can
> live without a car there. You have state sponsored public transportation
> and don't need to travel as far.
Hey boy, you don't live in southern Italy...
The overall Italian pol
Vladimir G. Ivanovic wrote:
>"KB" == Kathy Bieltz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> KB> Americans may earn more but our government
> KB> is no slouch at taking their cut. We may not
> KB> get taxed they same way but we still pay through
> KB> the nose too.
>
>Actually, this is a persistent b
Hi,
> Could anyone tell me where to find a COMPLETE description of the ELF
> format?
http://www.iecc.com/linker/linker03.html
Venkatesh
___
Redhat-devel-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-de
> On Mon, Apr 09, 2001 at 06:44:20PM -0400, Ivan Jager wrote:
> > What about:
> > make [make options] 2>&1 | tee output.log
>
>I prefer not to have to sort through to find the warnings
> and errors. Your approach has the benefit of context, mine of
> "purity" of information (
> On Mon, Apr 09, 2001 at 02:18:03PM -0700, Linux User wrote:
> > Hello everyone,
> > When compiling a C\C++ program is it possible to output any warning
> > during the compile to a file, so they can be reviewed later?
>
> gcc [options string] > stdout.log 2> stderr.log, or
>
> make [make optio
Thanks Chris.
That's exactly what I wanted. Outputing just the warnings into their own
file makes it quicker then having to scan the entire output.
Thanks,
Jim H
Chris Petro wrote:
>
> On Mon, Apr 09, 2001 at 02:18:03PM -0700, Linux User wrote:
> > Hello everyone,
> > When compiling a
On Mon, Apr 09, 2001 at 06:44:20PM -0400, Ivan Jager wrote:
> What about:
> make [make options] 2>&1 | tee output.log
I prefer not to have to sort through to find the warnings
and errors. Your approach has the benefit of context, mine of
"purity" of information (for want
What about:
make [make options] 2>&1 | tee output.log
Chris Petro wrote:
>
> On Mon, Apr 09, 2001 at 02:18:03PM -0700, Linux User wrote:
> > Hello everyone,
> > When compiling a C\C++ program is it possible to output any warning
> > during the compile to a file, so they can be reviewed later?
On Mon, Apr 09, 2001 at 02:18:03PM -0700, Linux User wrote:
> Hello everyone,
> When compiling a C\C++ program is it possible to output any warning
> during the compile to a file, so they can be reviewed later?
gcc [options string] > stdout.log 2> stderr.log, or
make [make options] > stdout.log
On Mon, 24 Jul 2000, Steven Lord wrote:
> I'm going to have to set up a machine to monitor bandwidth use and ethernet
> packets.
http://ee-staff.ethz.ch/~oetiker/webtools/mrtg/mrtg.html
--
Edward S. Marshall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> UNIX Administrator
http://www.nyx.net/~emarshal/
"Sergio A. Kessler" wrote:
>
> anyone know where I can read about dhcpd feeding (names,ip) to bind ?
ok, I did it.
Now I request that the next release (6.2 or 7.0) come with dhcp
server 3.0 or greater, please.
--
-= Sergio A. Kessler ==http://sak.org.ar =-
You can have it soon, cheap
"Sergio A. Kessler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> el día Tue, 14 Dec 1999 14:28:13
-0300, escribió:
>anyone know where I can read about dhcpd feeding (names,ip) to bind ?
somebody know the email of Greg Kulosa ? ...
http://www.linuxshowcase.org/1999/tutorials/W3.html
Sergio
--
To unsubscribe:
mail -s
21 matches
Mail list logo