Re: OT: Your message to LARTC awaits moderator approval (fwd)

2002-07-11 Thread Michael Schwendt
On 2002-07-10, Riku Meskanen wrote: RM> > http://www.lartc.org was the first I did think of. RM> > RM> Ok, it was _a_ joke (LART part if you did not get it), RM> but the issue more important is _what is the relevance_ RM> linking another moderated mailing list with different RM> topic to redhat-

Re: OT: Your message to LARTC awaits moderator approval (fwd)

2002-07-10 Thread Riku Meskanen
On Wed, 10 Jul 2002, Michael Schwendt wrote: > On 2002-07-10, Riku Meskanen wrote: > > RM> What is this? Somebody attached his own list to redhat-devel... > > http://www.lartc.org was the first I did think of. > Ok, it was _a_ joke (LART part if you did not get it), but the issue more important i

Re: OT: Your message to LARTC awaits moderator approval (fwd)

2002-07-10 Thread Michael Schwendt
On 2002-07-10, Riku Meskanen wrote: RM> What is this? Somebody attached his own list to redhat-devel... RM> RM> I couldn't mind less, but the list name LARTC? I'm sure RM> (almost) everybody knows what the LART is and darn if we RM> get struck by LART -- then something is badly wrong ;) RM> RM>

Re: OT: clearcase ...

2002-06-16 Thread Richard Troy
> I think the cost of dumping Clearcase is so high that no individual > project can afford to do it. So no one does. So you're stuck with it > forever. In practice, the issue of it being a sunk cost never enters the > discussion. "It's never too late to throw out all the code and start over." Pr

Re: OT: clearcase ...

2002-06-15 Thread Vladimir G. Ivanovic
I think the cost of dumping Clearcase is so high that no individual project can afford to do it. So no one does. So you're stuck with it forever. In practice, the issue of it being a sunk cost never enters the discussion. The problem is that Clearcase is integrated into your builds, into develope

Re: OT: clearcase ...

2002-06-15 Thread John Summerfield
> > When your organization has a sunk cost, it's wise to recognize it as early > as possible and move on. True, as a technical person it can be difficult > to deal with situations like this because often management doesn't > consider seriously the business acumen of technical people. But, honest

Re: OT: clearcase ...

2002-06-15 Thread Richard Troy
> "JOO" == James Olin Oden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > JOO> As it is though the current company I am working with has > JOO> invested heavily in clearcase and so any solution would require > JOO> it. > > Vladimir G. Ivanovic http://leonora.org/~vladimir: > Precisely. Once yo

Re: OT: clearcase ...

2002-06-15 Thread Vladimir G. Ivanovic
"JOO" == James Olin Oden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: JOO> As it is though the current company I am working with has JOO> invested heavily in clearcase and so any solution would require JOO> it. Precisely. Once you start with ClearCase, you're effectively locked into a costly, proprietary s

Re: [OT] Re: Pricing discrepancy (Re: next release)

2002-05-01 Thread Paul Dorneanu
I do believe that the international price for rh boxes should be plain, cause, after all, we pay for the support, not for the product itself, isn't that? If I'm not right, next month I'll come in US and start living a better life there... or ... -- Spooky Mario Torre wrote: >On Tuesday 30 Ap

Re: [OT] Re: Pricing discrepancy (Re: next release)

2002-05-01 Thread Mario Torre
On Tuesday 30 April 2002 22:11, Thomas Dodd wrote: > Fuel pricers are higher with higher taxes in europe. But you can > live without a car there. You have state sponsored public transportation > and don't need to travel as far. Hey boy, you don't live in southern Italy... The overall Italian pol

Re: [OT] Re: Pricing discrepancy (Re: next release)

2002-04-30 Thread Thomas Dodd
Vladimir G. Ivanovic wrote: >"KB" == Kathy Bieltz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > KB> Americans may earn more but our government > KB> is no slouch at taking their cut. We may not > KB> get taxed they same way but we still pay through > KB> the nose too. > >Actually, this is a persistent b

Re: OT: ELF format

2001-10-28 Thread Venkatesh Krishnamurthi
Hi, > Could anyone tell me where to find a COMPLETE description of the ELF > format? http://www.iecc.com/linker/linker03.html Venkatesh ___ Redhat-devel-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-de

Re: OT: Compiling C\C++ Programs Question

2001-04-10 Thread John Summerfield
> On Mon, Apr 09, 2001 at 06:44:20PM -0400, Ivan Jager wrote: > > What about: > > make [make options] 2>&1 | tee output.log > >I prefer not to have to sort through to find the warnings > and errors. Your approach has the benefit of context, mine of > "purity" of information (

Re: OT: Compiling C\C++ Programs Question

2001-04-10 Thread John Summerfield
> On Mon, Apr 09, 2001 at 02:18:03PM -0700, Linux User wrote: > > Hello everyone, > > When compiling a C\C++ program is it possible to output any warning > > during the compile to a file, so they can be reviewed later? > > gcc [options string] > stdout.log 2> stderr.log, or > > make [make optio

Re: OT: Compiling C\C++ Programs Question

2001-04-09 Thread J Hayward
Thanks Chris. That's exactly what I wanted. Outputing just the warnings into their own file makes it quicker then having to scan the entire output. Thanks, Jim H Chris Petro wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 09, 2001 at 02:18:03PM -0700, Linux User wrote: > > Hello everyone, > > When compiling a

Re: OT: Compiling C\C++ Programs Question

2001-04-09 Thread Chris Petro
On Mon, Apr 09, 2001 at 06:44:20PM -0400, Ivan Jager wrote: > What about: > make [make options] 2>&1 | tee output.log I prefer not to have to sort through to find the warnings and errors. Your approach has the benefit of context, mine of "purity" of information (for want

Re: OT: Compiling C\C++ Programs Question

2001-04-09 Thread Ivan Jager
What about: make [make options] 2>&1 | tee output.log Chris Petro wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 09, 2001 at 02:18:03PM -0700, Linux User wrote: > > Hello everyone, > > When compiling a C\C++ program is it possible to output any warning > > during the compile to a file, so they can be reviewed later?

Re: OT: Compiling C\C++ Programs Question

2001-04-09 Thread Chris Petro
On Mon, Apr 09, 2001 at 02:18:03PM -0700, Linux User wrote: > Hello everyone, > When compiling a C\C++ program is it possible to output any warning > during the compile to a file, so they can be reviewed later? gcc [options string] > stdout.log 2> stderr.log, or make [make options] > stdout.log

Re: OT: Network Performance Monitors

2000-07-24 Thread Edward S. Marshall
On Mon, 24 Jul 2000, Steven Lord wrote: > I'm going to have to set up a machine to monitor bandwidth use and ethernet > packets. http://ee-staff.ethz.ch/~oetiker/webtools/mrtg/mrtg.html -- Edward S. Marshall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> UNIX Administrator http://www.nyx.net/~emarshal/

Re: OT

1999-12-15 Thread Sergio A. Kessler
"Sergio A. Kessler" wrote: > > anyone know where I can read about dhcpd feeding (names,ip) to bind ? ok, I did it. Now I request that the next release (6.2 or 7.0) come with dhcp server 3.0 or greater, please. -- -= Sergio A. Kessler ==http://sak.org.ar =- You can have it soon, cheap

Re: OT

1999-12-14 Thread Sergio A. Kessler
"Sergio A. Kessler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> el día Tue, 14 Dec 1999 14:28:13 -0300, escribió: >anyone know where I can read about dhcpd feeding (names,ip) to bind ? somebody know the email of Greg Kulosa ? ... http://www.linuxshowcase.org/1999/tutorials/W3.html Sergio -- To unsubscribe: mail -s