Re: Minor problem with initscripts-4.41-2.i386.rpm

1999-09-20 Thread Nikolaos Margaritis
>What happens if you then do rpm -V initscripts after this? I get : S.5T c /etc/rc.d/init.d/halt S.5T c /etc/rc.d/rc.local Well, I have modified rc.local so don't worry about it -- Dr. Nikolaos A. Margaritis Agias Marinis 40, Larissa 41221, Hellas (Greece) Tel: +30(0)41 233568 URL: htt

Re: Minor problem with initscripts-4.41-2.i386.rpm

1999-09-20 Thread Bill Nottingham
Nikolaos Margaritis ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said: > Well there must be a bug in the spec file or something. I have > reinstalled initscripts-4.41-2.i386.rpm and the -p option in the 'halt' > script was still absent... What happens if you then do rpm -V initscripts after this? Bill -- To unsubscri

Re: Minor problem with initscripts-4.41-2.i386.rpm

1999-09-20 Thread Nikolaos Margaritis
On Mon, 20 Sep 1999, Bill Nottingham wrote: >Nikolaos Margaritis ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said: >> This is how used to be written in the previous release of initscripts >> but it is absent now... >> With -p my system shuts down properly as it should do :) > >Now I'm confused. The '-p' option has been

Re: Minor problem with initscripts-4.41-2.i386.rpm

1999-09-20 Thread Bill Nottingham
Nikolaos Margaritis ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said: > This is how used to be written in the previous release of initscripts > but it is absent now... > With -p my system shuts down properly as it should do :) Now I'm confused. The '-p' option has been in initscripts since 1999/02/03, according to the

Re: Minor problem with initscripts-4.41-2.i386.rpm

1999-09-20 Thread Nikolaos Margaritis
On Mon, 20 Sep 1999, Bill Nottingham wrote: >Nikolaos Margaritis ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said: >> I suggest we put "halt -p" instead of simply "halt" >> so that the system powers off properly. (unless some other >> change has taken place) > >Um, the halt -p has been there for quite a while. Perhaps

Re: Minor problem with initscripts-4.41-2.i386.rpm

1999-09-20 Thread Bill Nottingham
Nikolaos Margaritis ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said: > I suggest we put "halt -p" instead of simply "halt" > so that the system powers off properly. (unless some other > change has taken place) Um, the halt -p has been there for quite a while. Perhaps your BIOS/kernel doesn't support it? Bill   --