Message -
> From: "John Summerfield" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 11:35 PM
> Subject: Re: Configuring firewall appliances
>
>
> > > Why is the webserver based on the 2.0 kernel? Would security no
mber 01, 2001 11:35 PM
Subject: Re: Configuring firewall appliances
> > Why is the webserver based on the 2.0 kernel? Would security not be an
issue
> > for the kernel considering the fact that its an older kernel with a much
> > lesser inbuilt firewall capability.
>
> Dunno d
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: John Summerfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: den 31 oktober 2001 02:10
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Configuring firewall appliances
>
>
> > iproute, ipchains except i
email :[EMAIL PROTECTED]
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: John Summerfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: den 31 oktober 2001 02:10
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Configuring firewall appliances
> iproute, ipchains except if you mean graphical tools
>
>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 2:10 AM
Subject: Re: Configuring firewall appliances
> > iproute, ipchains except if you mean graphical tools
> >
> >
>
> I was looking yesterday at a commercial package based on kernel 2.0. Its
web server s
> iproute, ipchains except if you mean graphical tools
>
>
I was looking yesterday at a commercial package based on kernel 2.0. Its web server
serves out web pages for configuration allowing administration from any browser.
I'm interested in seeing what its competition is, particularly free.
iproute, ipchains except if you mean graphical tools
Osazemoya Uhumuavbi
Datacoms Solutions
New Campus
office :+46 063 19 52 69
mobile :+46 070 695 01 35
email :[EMAIL PROTECTED]
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: John Summerfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
