Jean Francois Martinez wrote:
>
> > I think that it is really cool, spiffy, neato that RH 7.2 installs and
> > pretty much just works. For the last three installs of 7.2 I did, I
> > *needed* to make only a couple of little tweaks to get basic
> > functionality going. This is a good thing.
I wor
On Sun, 5 May 2002, Ronald W. Heiby wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-> Hash: SHA1
>
> Sunday, May 5, 2002, 7:39:51 AM, Jean wrote:
> > But now you find that the macho Unixers will win that their little
> > brains are unable to decypzer the scripts who configure the network
> > in RedHat
On Sun, 5 May 2002 11:52:43 -0500
"Ronald W. Heiby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Sunday, May 5, 2002, 7:39:51 AM, Jean wrote:
> > But now you find that the macho Unixers will win that their little
> > brains are unable to decypzer the scripts w
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Sunday, May 5, 2002, 7:39:51 AM, Jean wrote:
> But now you find that the macho Unixers will win that their little
> brains are unable to decypzer the scripts who configure the network
> in RedHat or Mandrake and that is why they want a bare bones dist
On 03 May 2002 22:39:00 +0100
Michel Alexandre Salim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 2002-05-02 at 22:55, Jean Francois Martinez wrote:
> > I am getting tired of the asssimilation "easy distribution" with
> > "distro for newbies". It has also as a side effect some people
> > believe that c
> On Fri, 2002-05-03 at 15:42, John Summerfield wrote:
> > Now you can have 'openoffice.org' 1.0.
> >
> >
> Good to see I'm the only one who sees having 'dot' something in every
> product a major irritance :p
I think (why am I starting everything with those words?) there is a trademark
problem
On Fri, 2002-05-03 at 15:42, John Summerfield wrote:
> Now you can have 'openoffice.org' 1.0.
>
>
Good to see I'm the only one who sees having 'dot' something in every
product a major irritance :p
.NET . Sun, the dot in dot com . OpenOffice.org . ehm... RedHat.com
Linux.NET (R) (TM)? :P
--
Mi
On Thu, 2002-05-02 at 22:55, Jean Francois Martinez wrote:
> I am getting tired of the asssimilation "easy distribution" with
> "distro for newbies". It has also as a side effect some people
> believe that chnaging to a difficult distribution will maek them
> as elite. To begin with difficult d
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> Most of the red hat disks I've obtained from magazines or in the back
> of books. I recently purchased a red hat box, for the copy of
> StarOffice included. I've tried to download copies, but have yet to
> reach success.
Now you can have 'openoffice.org' 1.0.
--
>From: Kevin Waterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: A Red Hat user's introduction to Debian
>Date: Thu, 2 May 2002 14:16:33 +1000
>
>I found this little article in my mail and
>would like to hear any thoughts?
>http://debian-br.sourceforge.net/tx
On Thu, 2 May 2002 15:59:51 +0200 (CEST)
Michael Schwendt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2002-05-02, Kevin Waterson wrote:
>
> :I found this little article in my mail and
> :would like to hear any thoughts?
> :http://debian-br.sourceforge.net/txt/debian_vs_redhat.html
>
> => Last updated on 0
--- Michael Schwendt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On
2002-05-02, Kevin Waterson wrote:
> stuff working. Nothing for Linux newbies. The text
> mode installer
> asks many specific questions about graphics adapter
> and monitor
> capabilities, that reminded me of old Slackware.
?!? There is no auto-
On 2002-05-02, Kevin Waterson wrote:
:I found this little article in my mail and
:would like to hear any thoughts?
:http://debian-br.sourceforge.net/txt/debian_vs_redhat.html
=> Last updated on 06/11/1998!
Installing Debian GNU/Linux "Woody" (the "testing" distribution that
will become 3.0 eve
> I found this little article in my mail and
> would like to hear any thoughts?
> http://debian-br.sourceforge.net/txt/debian_vs_redhat.html
A mate downloaded the latest a few weeks ago. Installing it was all the intro I
needed. 2.2 kernel indeed! Almost certainly it won't run on my Athlon (Vi
On Thu, 2 May 2002, Kevin Waterson wrote:
> I found this little article in my mail and
> would like to hear any thoughts?
> http://debian-br.sourceforge.net/txt/debian_vs_redhat.html
"unconvincing"
-Dan
--
[-] Omae no subete no kichi wa ore no mono da. [-]
__
"KW" == Kevin Waterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
KW> I found this little article in my mail and
KW> would like to hear any thoughts?
KW> http://debian-br.sourceforge.net/txt/debian_vs_redhat.html
Well, for one the comments were made nearly 4 years ago, so alternatives
has been ported to
16 matches
Mail list logo
