On Sat, 24 Jun 2000, Damien Miller wrote:
> Wouldn't it be better to just toss wu-ftpd in favour of OpenBSD's?
> wu-ftpd has an absolutely appalling security record.
It's not pretty, and it needs work in the spec file, but see:
http://www.owlriver.com/projects/ftpd-BSD/index.html
It _does_ w
Damien Miller wrote:
>
> On Sat, 24 Jun 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > Is there a new wu-ftpd package to fix the latest
> > exploit published on BUGTRAQ
>
> Wouldn't it be better to just toss wu-ftpd in favour of OpenBSD's?
> wu-ftpd has an absolutely appalling security record.
So does se
On Sat, 24 Jun 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Is there a new wu-ftpd package to fix the latest
> exploit published on BUGTRAQ
Wouldn't it be better to just toss wu-ftpd in favour of OpenBSD's?
wu-ftpd has an absolutely appalling security record.
-d
--
| "Bombay is 250ms from New York in the
On Sat, 24 Jun 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Is there a new wu-ftpd package to fix the latest
> exploit published on BUGTRAQ
Yes, in updates.
LLaP
bero
___
Redhat-devel-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinf
