RE: About PCYNLITX project and its innovations

2019-06-25 Thread JOHN BULLOCK
Please correct your records The current e-mail address for John Bullock should be johnjamesbull...@gmail.com Thank You.. ___ Redhat-devel-list mailing list Redhat-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-devel-list

Re: Stack Size of a thread

2003-10-19 Thread Kenneth Porter
--On Sunday, October 19, 2003 12:35 PM +0200 sting sting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: As I know there is a default stack size for a pthread; but it grows and shrinks during run time. can I know the size of this stack during run time ? I don't know about Linux, but under another OS (OS/2) the stack

Re: mailx -r option

2003-10-17 Thread Tarhon-Onu Victor
On Fri, 17 Oct 2003, Diane Prange wrote: > anyone know of a way to script mailing an e-mail specifying -r, who it > is from, -s, the subject, -c copy to, and -b blind copy. Or does anyone > know of source for BSD mailx which will run on RedHat 9.0? You should better modify a little bit t

Re: mailx -r option

2003-10-17 Thread Joshua Andrews
Diane Prange wrote: We are moving a system from Solaris to RedHat 9.0. I am working on converting perl scripts to work on RedHat 9.0. Most of the scripts use the BSD mailx program to mail out notices with the "-r" flag which allows you to specify who the letter is from. The /bin/mail program wh

Re: mailx -r option

2003-10-17 Thread Venkatesh Krishnamurthi
Hi, The mutt man page says that it supports the -b, -c and -s flags. It also says that the REPLYTO environment variable can be used to specify the default reply-to address. This leads me to believe you could use mutt as a mailx replacement in your scripts by setting the REPLYTO variable prior

Re: mailx -r option

2003-10-17 Thread Bob Tennent
>|does anyone >|know of source for BSD mailx which will run on RedHat 9.0? Check out nail at http://omnibus.ruf.uni-freiburg.de/~gritter/ Bob T. ___ Redhat-devel-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-dev

Re: Fiinding size (or percent) of memory a thread occupies

2003-10-16 Thread Kenneth Porter
--On Thursday, October 16, 2003 5:33 PM +0200 sting sting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 1)The top command shows the memory of a process and all its threads as if > they > were all using the same size of memory ; which is probably so; > I have a process with some (5) threads and I want to know how

Re: ps -aux command on RH 9 , treads , and previous RH versions

2003-10-16 Thread Michael Schwendt
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, 16 Oct 2003 15:01:57 +0200, sting sting wrote: > I am using RH7.3 , RH8 , and RH 9 . > I am writing an application in C++, called myApp (the executable) which uses > 5 threads; (posix threads) > Now , the output of ps -aux | grep myApp > on R

RE: How to customize Linux rmdir system call

2003-10-08 Thread John Fabello
Sorry all...I know that is inappropriate for this list...Didn't mean to send it to everyone. My apologies. ~John Fabello 425-456-8900 -Original Message- From: John Fabello Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2003 2:10 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: How to customize Linux rmdir s

RE: How to customize Linux rmdir system call

2003-10-08 Thread John Fabello
] Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2003 2:04 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Linse Pallan Subject: Re: How to customize Linux rmdir system call On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 03:39:21PM -0400, Linse Pallan wrote: > Can anyone help me ? You can avoid rebuilding glibc by implementing the functions that you want

Re: How to customize Linux rmdir system call

2003-10-08 Thread Bill Rugolsky Jr.
On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 03:39:21PM -0400, Linse Pallan wrote: > Can anyone help me ? You can avoid rebuilding glibc by implementing the functions that you want to override in a shared object, and using system-wide preloading by specifying the library in /etc/ld.so.preload. See the man page ld.so(

Re: mkinitrd failed with 'All of your loopback devices are in use'

2003-10-03 Thread James Olin Oden
On Thu, 2 Oct 2003, Alan Yang wrote: > Hello, > > I ran into a situation where I don't know how to break the catch-22 cycle. > The scenario is like this: > 0. from a DELL machine with scsi device > 1. I installed the FreeSwan ipsec that seems like a rebuild of kernel is required > so that

Re: mkinitrd failed with 'All of your loopback devices are in use'

2003-10-03 Thread John Haxby
Alan Yang wrote: so, I am stuck. what to do? I cannot reboot because it would panic and if I do mkinitrd trying to make a valid img file that would also fail due to the loop.o wasn't in the kernel that I booted from. Boot the standard Red Hat kernel and then run mkinitrd. jch _

Re: mkinitrd failed with 'All of your loopback devices are in use'

2003-10-03 Thread Venkatesh Krishnamurthi
op.o wasn't in the kernel that I booted from. > > cannot seem to figure a way to break this cycle. > > Did I miss anything? > > Thanks, > alan > > -Original Message- > From: John Haxby [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, October 03,

RE: mkinitrd failed with 'All of your loopback devices are in use'

2003-10-03 Thread Alan Yang
Friday, October 03, 2003 12:09 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: mkinitrd failed with 'All of your loopback devices are in use' Alan Yang wrote: >Hello, > >I ran into a situation where I don't know how to break the catch-22 cycle. >The scenario is like this: >0.

Re: mkinitrd failed with 'All of your loopback devices are in use'

2003-10-03 Thread John Haxby
Alan Yang wrote: Hello, I ran into a situation where I don't know how to break the catch-22 cycle. The scenario is like this: 0. from a DELL machine with scsi device 1. I installed the FreeSwan ipsec that seems like a rebuild of kernel is required so that when insmod loads ipsec.o there wil

Re: using bash features in init scripts

2003-10-01 Thread Bill Nottingham
> Is it possible that bash isn't available yet? > Perhaps some lib not on /? No, all bash libs are available on the root FS. They kind of have to be, as bash *is* /bin/sh... Bill ___ Redhat-devel-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.

Re: using bash features in init scripts

2003-10-01 Thread Thomas Dodd
Jonathan Bartlett wrote: The reason that normal startup scripts don't, is that there's no guarantee /bin/sh will point to bash, or even that bash is installed. If you want to use bash, the first line should be /bin/bash instead of /bin/sh, so it's obvious it needs bash specifically. Is it possibl

Re: using bash features in init scripts

2003-09-30 Thread John
On Sun, 28 Sep 2003, Jonathan Bartlett wrote: > The reason that normal startup scripts don't, is that there's no guarantee > /bin/sh will point to bash, or even that bash is installed. Have you tried to install RHL sans bash? Thought not. RH _can_ make that guarantee. -- Please, reply only to

Re: using bash features in init scripts

2003-09-28 Thread Vilius Puidokas
also you would wanna add requires: bash for initscripts rpm. not sure how portable initscripts package was designed to be, would anyone ever use it outside redhat? if not making a commitment to bash could be reasonable. just my .02 v On Sun, 28 Sep 2003, Jonathan Bartlett wrote: > The reason t

Re: using bash features in init scripts

2003-09-28 Thread Jonathan Bartlett
The reason that normal startup scripts don't, is that there's no guarantee /bin/sh will point to bash, or even that bash is installed. If you want to use bash, the first line should be /bin/bash instead of /bin/sh, so it's obvious it needs bash specifically. Jon On Sun, 28 Sep 2003, [iso-8859-1]

Re: using bash features in init scripts

2003-09-28 Thread Steven W. Orr
On Sunday, Sep 28th 2003 at 14:31 +0100, quoth Manoj Kumar: =>Is there any reason not to use bash features in init =>scripts? =>Consider, for example, this fragment from =>/etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifup-post: => =>DEVICETYPE=`echo $DEVICE | sed "s/[0-9]*$//"` =>REALDEVICE=`echo $DEVIC

Re: Hot to know system wide shell variable?

2003-09-24 Thread Vilius Puidokas
/etc/profile would probably be the one. grep -ir ulimit /etc/* /etc/init.d/functions: ulimit -S -c 0 >/dev/null 2>&1 /etc/profile:ulimit -S -c 0 > /dev/null 2>&1 /etc/rc.d/init.d/functions: ulimit -S -c 0 >/dev/null 2>&1 [this is on RH7.2] On Wed, 24 Sep 2003, Masahide Tomita wrote: > Hi,

Re: Hot to know system wide shell variable?

2003-09-24 Thread John Haxby
-c ? Well, it's not a shell variable, but /etc/profile says "ulimit -S -c 0" to "turn off" core dumping. I suspect that you are re-enabling it in your own profile. If you want to enable core dumping for a specific daemon, then either start it from your own

Re: Staying close to mainline and VM issues

2003-09-22 Thread Yusuf Goolamabbas
Dave, Thanks for the response. When I tested severn (early in the cycle) it seemed fine for me (was using a non highmem) boxes. We are however seeing a lot of issues in Shrike,Valhalla,RH 8 with the 2.4.20-xx kernels on highmem boxes >1GB. I am going to try and setup a test box with >1GB and see

Re: nameif with PCMCIA nics

2003-09-05 Thread Al Potter
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > You can edit the files by hand, having the device/alias be that should > work. I've done that at the 7.3 level with great success, but the changes to the script structure in 9 (I skipped 8, first time ever) evaded me, and I went back to the gui to make the entries and

Re: nameif with PCMCIA nics

2003-09-04 Thread Bill Nottingham
Al Potter ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said: > And old-time RedHat hax0r that I am, I tend to try the supplied gui tools to > configure things and then check the config files to see what changed. In > this case, ath$ does not even show up as a possibility in > redhatconfig-network. You can edit the fi

Re: nameif with PCMCIA nics

2003-09-04 Thread Al Potter
While we're on the subject, and I apologize in advance for asking here, I've been fooling with the madwifi drivers for the Atheros chipset wireless cardbus and pcmcia cards. This driver was ported from $BSD, and the company name _is_ Atheros, so it shows up in linux as ath0, not eth0. This see

Re: nameif with PCMCIA nics

2003-09-04 Thread Bill Nottingham
Pekka Savola ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said: > > > > Can you elaborate in what way it isn't working? > > > > > Yes, later today. > > > > Try the attached. > > Good for testing, but the real fix probably needs to disregard some > specific files from "ifcfg-*", like in /etc/init.d/network: > > interf

Re: nameif with PCMCIA nics

2003-09-03 Thread Pekka Savola
On Wed, 3 Sep 2003, Bill Nottingham wrote: > Dax Kelson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said: > > > > In my testing, it is *not* > > > > working with PCMCIA nics. :( > > > > > > Can you elaborate in what way it isn't working? > > > > > > Bill > > > > Yes, later today. > > Try the attached. Good for testi

Re: nameif with PCMCIA nics

2003-09-03 Thread Bill Nottingham
Dax Kelson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said: > > > In my testing, it is *not* > > > working with PCMCIA nics. :( > > > > Can you elaborate in what way it isn't working? > > > > Bill > > Yes, later today. Try the attached. Bill --- hotplug-2002_04_01/etc/hotplug/net.agent.foo2003-09-03 16:48

Re: nameif with PCMCIA nics

2003-09-02 Thread Bill Nottingham
Dax Kelson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said: > I have a PCMCIA: > > Cisco Aironet 350 > Lucent Orinoco Gold > Xircom RealPort Ethernet > > Ideally I would like the following hardcoded: > > Orinoco == eth1 > Aironet == eth2 > Xircom == eth3 > > Looking in severn I noticed that the initscripts package

Re: php-mbstring of rpm

2003-09-01 Thread Joseph Tate
Just do like all of us who need features like crack and domxml (pre RHL 9) do: rebuild the SRPM. It's really not that difficult. T.T. wrote: > Hello. > I use Red Hat Network. > Plese make the php-mbstring of rpm. > *** > php-mbstring for ./configure --with-mbst

Re: Install Red Hat 9.0 KDE developer

2003-08-25 Thread Leonard den Ottolander
Hi Roberto, > I'm installing KDE developer, 2.1x for KDE 3.1.5. I'm running Red Hat > 9.0. At the very beginning, I'm told by KDE Develop Setup, the the QT > documentation is found, but the the KDELIB-DOC is not found. Not entirly sure what you are looking for, but did you install kdelibs- deve

Re: ioremap: How to

2003-08-21 Thread Jeff Koftinoff
You must compile with optimization... -O2 jeff rahul patil wrote: hi, I want build an application that requires the exact memory address (for LCD display). I use ioremap to achieve that. However, when i try to compile the file, i get the following error. implicit declaration of ioremap and he

RE: "Hyperthreading"

2003-08-19 Thread Joerg Battermann
using both virtual cpus, tried different bioses etc.. but no worky :( -j -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Laurent GUERBY Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 12:51 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: "Hyperthreading" On Tue, 2003-08-1

Re: "Hyperthreading"

2003-08-19 Thread Laurent GUERBY
On Tue, 2003-08-19 at 12:16, James Olin Oden wrote: > I think 2.4.18 of the linux kernel and beyond do so, and specifically RH 9 > supports hyper threading right out of the box. I have been using it on > some boxes supporting hyperthreading without any issues since the RH 9 > beta came out (phoebe

Re: "Hyperthreading"

2003-08-19 Thread James Olin Oden
On Mon, 18 Aug 2003, Richard Troy wrote: > > > Hi guys, > > I'm just wondering: We just recently - last weekend - decided to "move > into the modern era" on one of our server boxes running RedHat Linux. Our > hardware selection was P4 2.6ghz, 800mhz fsb, with a gig of main memory on > an Intel

RE: FireWire HDD problem

2003-08-19 Thread Rishabh Kumar Goel
Hollis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 18, 2003 11:27 PM To: Rishabh Kumar Goel Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: FireWire HDD problem On Mon, 18 Aug 2003, Rishabh Kumar Goel wrote: > I have a Bencent 3.5" FireWire HDD. I also have a TI's TSB43ab22 iOHCI PCI > car

Re: "Hyperthreading"

2003-08-18 Thread Richard Troy
> > Hi guys, > > > > I'm just wondering: We just recently - last weekend - decided to "move > > into the modern era" on one of our server boxes running RedHat Linux. Our > > hardware selection was P4 2.6ghz, 800mhz fsb, with a gig of main memory on > > an Intel brand mother board with integrated

Re: "Hyperthreading"

2003-08-18 Thread John
On Mon, 18 Aug 2003, Richard Troy wrote: > > > Hi guys, > > I'm just wondering: We just recently - last weekend - decided to "move > into the modern era" on one of our server boxes running RedHat Linux. Our > hardware selection was P4 2.6ghz, 800mhz fsb, with a gig of main memory on > an Intel

Re: "Hyperthreading"

2003-08-18 Thread Joseph Tate
I don't know about >120GB drives, however, Hyperthreading works in the recent Red Hat released 2.4 kernels. I'm not sure if that's a back port from 2.6 or what. What happens is the kernel sees 2*n processors where n is the number of physical processors in the machine. I.e. if you have a 2 pr

Re: firewire vs USB2 for Maxtor 5000DV (was: FireWire HDD problem)

2003-08-18 Thread Dan Hollis
On Mon, 18 Aug 2003, Laurent GUERBY wrote: > Will newer Red Hat releases / kernel versions get better performance > and plug/unplug behaviour? Any other user experience with this drive? usb2 in the kernel is very new and performance is not the best. i get about 50% more performance from firewire

Re: FireWire HDD problem

2003-08-18 Thread Dan Hollis
On Mon, 18 Aug 2003, Rishabh Kumar Goel wrote: > I have a Bencent 3.5" FireWire HDD. I also have a TI's TSB43ab22 iOHCI PCI > card with a PCI-PCI bridge interface. You have to set the drive for cable select, not master or slave. -Dan -- [-] Omae no subete no kichi wa ore no mono da. [-] _

Re: FireWire HDD problem

2003-08-18 Thread Venkatesh Krishnamurthi
Hi, For what it's worth, a web search turned up: http://armin.emx.at/ipod/ieee1394_howto.html Venkatesh > I have a Bencent 3.5" FireWire HDD. I also have a TI's TSB43ab22 iOHCI PCI > card with a PCI-PCI bridge interface. > When i plug the HDD into the card in my Pentium 4, i recie

Re: FireWire HDD problem

2003-08-18 Thread John
On Mon, 18 Aug 2003, Rishabh Kumar Goel wrote: > I have a Bencent 3.5" FireWire HDD. I also have a TI's TSB43ab22 iOHCI PCI > card with a PCI-PCI bridge interface. > When i plug the HDD into the card in my Pentium 4, i recieve the following > errors: > 1.Configrom Quadlet read error. > 2.

Re: Insure++ Alternatives

2003-08-04 Thread Philip Wyett
On Mon, 2003-08-04 at 20:18, Sadanapalli, Pradeep Kumar (MED, TCS) wrote: > Hi , > I am not sure whether this is the correct list for my post, if not > excuse me. > > For the runtime testing of C++ applications for memory corruption and > memory leak detection , > we are currently using Insure++ f

RE: Finding CPU Utilization %

2003-08-02 Thread SKY
Cat /proc/stat -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gary Cote Sent: 2003年6月6日 2:52 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Finding CPU Utilization % This might be splitting hairs, but the load average, as I understand it, is not exactly CPU

Re: LSI 320 RAID cards with RedHat 8 and 9 install isos

2003-07-30 Thread Aaron Vinson
Actually, I'm not trying to add a new driver. Just adding a few entries to the pcitable so that the card is detected and the megaraid module is loaded automatically. My pcitable entries are fine, the card is detected at install time. The only issue is when the installer fails on the hwdata rpm,

Re: LSI 320 RAID cards with RedHat 8 and 9 install isos

2003-07-30 Thread Eric Wood
I don't know how to make custom iso install cds with newer drivers bundled in. However, I'm sure you're aware that you can download LSI's driver disk and install RH 8 using "linux dd" at the boot prompt. This will get you using the 1.18h driver. It still doesn't look like they've released a 1.18

Re: ioremap: How to

2003-07-19 Thread Nathan Bryant
Have you tried mmap()ing /dev/mem? You would then directly access 0x1 - start + base, where base is the address of the virtual memory that mmap assigned to your pages, and start is the first address of physical memory that you actually specified to map. You should avoid mapping any more pag

Re: ioremap: How to

2003-07-18 Thread Richard Troy
On 19 Jul 2003, rahul patil wrote: > > hi, > I want build an application that requires the exact memory address > (for LCD display). I use ioremap to achieve that. However, when i > try to compile the file, i get the following error. > > implicit declaration of ioremap > and hence > unreferenced

Re: ioremap: How to

2003-07-18 Thread John
On 19 Jul 2003, rahul patil wrote: > hi, > I want build an application that requires the exact memory address > (for LCD display). I use ioremap to achieve that. However, when i > try to compile the file, i get the following error. > > implicit declaration of ioremap > and hence > unreferenced

Re: Firewall oddity

2003-07-14 Thread Tarhon-Onu Victor
On Mon, 14 Jul 2003, Steve Dixon wrote: > servers have changed or the line itself, the only difference is the OS > of the gateway. Any idea what could be causing the slow connection to > the server? There is possible that the imap server you're connecting to is configured to perform user

Re: Firewall oddity

2003-07-14 Thread Tom Diehl
On Mon, 14 Jul 2003, Steve Dixon wrote: > We switched over from a windows 2000 server for a gateway to a redhat 9 > box, all updates. I am using a firewall tool called narc. I've tried > others but with the same effect. Before we switched over to linux we > could connect to our mail server(loca

Re: sys/systat.h and S_IFMT definition

2003-07-09 Thread Vladimir G. Ivanovic
> "mt" == Miloslav Trmac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: mt> On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 08:32:35AM -0700, Vladimir G. Ivanovic wrote: >> Isn't S_IFMT defined as part of POSIX and not part of the XSI extensions? >> >> http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/007904975/basedefs/sys/stat.h.h

Re: sys/systat.h and S_IFMT definition

2003-07-08 Thread Miloslav Trmac
On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 08:32:35AM -0700, Vladimir G. Ivanovic wrote: > Isn't S_IFMT defined as part of POSIX and not part of the XSI extensions? > >http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/007904975/basedefs/sys/stat.h.html See the PDF version. It surely "looks" more official, although in theory b

Re: SegFault with -fstack-check

2003-07-07 Thread John
On Mon, 7 Jul 2003, John wrote: > On Mon, 7 Jul 2003, Leonard den Ottolander wrote: > > > Hi Sean, > > > > > So it seems to be "distro" relatedhmmm... > > > > Well, compiler version related (but afaik only Red Hat ships the gcc-2.96 > > compiler). On my Red Hat 7.3 system the error also i

Re: SegFault with -fstack-check

2003-07-07 Thread John
On Mon, 7 Jul 2003, Michael Schwendt wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Mon, 7 Jul 2003 02:24:38 +0200, Leonard den Ottolander wrote: > > > Hi Sean, > > > > > So it seems to be "distro" relatedhmmm... > > > > Well, compiler version related (but afaik only Red

Re: SegFault with -fstack-check

2003-07-07 Thread Michael Schwendt
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, 7 Jul 2003 02:24:38 +0200, Leonard den Ottolander wrote: > Hi Sean, > > > So it seems to be "distro" relatedhmmm... > > Well, compiler version related (but afaik only Red Hat ships the gcc-2.96 > compiler). On my Red Hat 7.3 system the

Re: SegFault with -fstack-check

2003-07-06 Thread John
On Mon, 7 Jul 2003, Leonard den Ottolander wrote: > Hi Sean, > > > So it seems to be "distro" relatedhmmm... > > Well, compiler version related (but afaik only Red Hat ships the gcc-2.96 > compiler). On my Red Hat 7.3 system the error also is reproducible. You should I had a mate check o

Re: SegFault with -fstack-check

2003-07-06 Thread John
On Mon, 7 Jul 2003, Leonard den Ottolander wrote: > Hi Sean, > > > So it seems to be "distro" relatedhmmm... > > Well, compiler version related (but afaik only Red Hat ships the gcc-2.96 > compiler). On my Red Hat 7.3 system the error also is reproducible. You should > probably report a b

Re: SegFault with -fstack-check

2003-07-06 Thread Leonard den Ottolander
Hi Sean, > So it seems to be "distro" relatedhmmm... Well, compiler version related (but afaik only Red Hat ships the gcc-2.96 compiler). On my Red Hat 7.3 system the error also is reproducible. You should probably report a bug at http://bugzilla.redhat.com . By the way, if you need stac

Re: SegFault with -fstack-check

2003-07-06 Thread John
On 6 Jul 2003, Sean Bruno wrote: > So it seems to be "distro" relatedhmmm... > I don't have a RHL 8.0 or 9 system to test on. If you can take the time, build gcc (the most likely candidate) from the tarball contained in the src.rpm and see whether that has the problem. The spec file contains

Re: SegFault with -fstack-check

2003-07-06 Thread Sean Bruno
So it seems to be "distro" relatedhmmm... Anyone from Red-Hat wanna' chime in on this one? On Sun, 2003-07-06 at 15:52, John wrote: > On 6 Jul 2003, Sean Bruno wrote: > > > I have been troubleshooting an issue with a multi-threaded application > > port from Solaris X86 to Linux. > > > > It

Re: SegFault with -fstack-check

2003-07-06 Thread John
On 6 Jul 2003, Sean Bruno wrote: > I have been troubleshooting an issue with a multi-threaded application > port from Solaris X86 to Linux. > > It was randomly dumping core on "main" or other random parts of code. > > After hacking on the issue for about a week, I decided to write a little > hel

RE: confirm 353173

2003-07-03 Thread dave.webster
-Original Message- From: rtiger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thu 03/07/2003 15:16 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Subject: confirm 353173 ___ Redhat-devel-lis

Re: StackGuard gcc

2003-06-27 Thread Leonard den Ottolander
Hi John, > As I recall from when I looked at StackGuard some time ago, 'Canary" is > a technical term in the context of StackGuard. That I am aware of. Problem is how to get rid of the undefined reference. > I suggest you seek help from immunix where you will find people expert > in the use and

Re: StackGuard gcc

2003-06-26 Thread John
On Thu, 26 Jun 2003, Leonard den Ottolander wrote: > Hi, > > I am trying to build a stackguarded gcc-2.96-RH73 from the latest StackGuard > patch that can be found at http://www.immunix.org/stackguard.html (updated > june 2003!). Problem is I keep getting > stage1/crtbegin.o(.text+0x9d): undef

Re: internal buffer overflow in init...

2003-06-18 Thread James Olin Oden
On Fri, 13 Jun 2003, James Olin Oden wrote: > OK, this is the original problem I was trying to figure with the debug > version of init. In house we have an app that was starting a process > manager from init. It was starting after the sysinit entry and before > the runlevel script entries (it n

Re: ip_conntrack: table full

2003-06-17 Thread Balint Cristian
On Tuesday 17 June 2003 09:01, Farkas Levente wrote: > hi, > so my biggest problem is that, when I've got these error and keep > getting the error, than do wc -l /proc/net/ip_conntrack and it's just > 300-400 so I assume 48632 is more than enough. am I wrong? Hmm no not wrong, i am sure that wc -l

RE: threads problems in RedHat9??

2003-06-17 Thread Thomas Bailey
This is something I have been wondering about as well ... -Original Message- From: Maxim Koshelev [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 17 June 2003 13:38 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: threads problems in RedHat9?? ---INTERNET EMAIL NOTIFICATION--- This email originates from the

Re: ip_conntrack: table full

2003-06-17 Thread Farkas Levente
hi, so my biggest problem is that, when I've got these error and keep getting the error, than do wc -l /proc/net/ip_conntrack and it's just 300-400 so I assume 48632 is more than enough. am I wrong? Balint Cristian wrote: On Tuesday 17 June 2003 15:23, Farkas Levente wrote: hi, I forgot to menti

Re: ip_conntrack: table full

2003-06-17 Thread Farkas Levente
Tarhon-Onu Victor wrote: On Tue, 17 Jun 2003, Balint Cristian wrote: you can change it: [EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# echo 1024000 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_conntrack_max Be careful if increase will eat more memory Or if you don't have {S,D}NAT rules in the nat table it would be wise to r

Re: threads problems in =?utf-7?b?UmVkSGF0OSt1cGRhdFEt?=

2003-06-17 Thread Maxim Koshelev
Hello again, All work fine with linking vs /lib/i686. Just one broblem left: how to built on generic RH9 host without changing permisions on /lib/tls or removing them... Thanks again to Thomas. Thomas Bailey wrote: >Maxim, > >I had a similar problem - the destructors associated with thread >spe

Re: ip_conntrack: table full

2003-06-17 Thread Balint Cristian
On Tuesday 17 June 2003 15:23, Farkas Levente wrote: > hi, > I forgot to mention that it can't be the reason: > # cat /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_conntrack_max > 48632 > > Balint Cristian wrote: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# cat /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_conntrack_max > > 8184 > > > > It is 8000 entry by defa

Re: ip_conntrack: table full

2003-06-17 Thread Tarhon-Onu Victor
On Tue, 17 Jun 2003, Balint Cristian wrote: > you can change it: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# echo 1024000 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_conntrack_max > > Be careful if increase will eat more memory Or if you don't have {S,D}NAT rules in the nat table it would be wise to rmmod ip_conntrack

Re: ip_conntrack: table full

2003-06-17 Thread Farkas Levente
hi, I forgot to mention that it can't be the reason: # cat /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_conntrack_max 48632 Balint Cristian wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# cat /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_conntrack_max 8184 It is 8000 entry by default you can change it: [EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# echo 1024000 > /proc/sys/net/ip

Re: ip_conntrack: table full

2003-06-17 Thread Balint Cristian
[EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# cat /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_conntrack_max 8184 It is 8000 entry by default you can change it: [EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# echo 1024000 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_conntrack_max Be careful if increase will eat more memory On Tuesday 17 June 2003 14:29, Farkas Levente wrot

Re: threads problems in RedHat9

2003-06-17 Thread John
On Tue, 17 Jun 2003, Maxim Koshelev wrote: > Thanks Thomas, > I'll try this workarround today. > But why redhat team distribute such broken library? Ah, the joys of bleeding-edge software. -- Please, reply only to the list. Join the "Linux Support by Small Businesses" list at http://mail.co

Re: threads problems in RedHat9

2003-06-17 Thread Maxim Koshelev
Thanks Thomas, I'll try this workarround today. But why redhat team distribute such broken library? Thanks again for explanation. Maxim. Thomas Bailey wrote: >Maxim, > >I had a similar problem - the destructors associated with thread >specific storage are not called in the RH 9 pthread library ei

=?utf-7?q?RE=3A_threads_problems_in_RedHat9+upc-?==?utf-7?q?+WrU-?=

2003-06-17 Thread Thomas Bailey
Maxim, I had a similar problem - the destructors associated with thread specific storage are not called in the RH 9 pthread library either. You can work around this by linking against the pthread and libc libraries in /lib or /lib/i686, which seem to work. Unfortunately, the only way I could do t

Re: DEBUG output in init causes fifo to be ignored...

2003-06-16 Thread James Olin Oden
On Mon, 16 Jun 2003, James Olin Oden wrote: > On Mon, 16 Jun 2003, Bill Nottingham wrote: > > > James Olin Oden ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said: > > > On Mon, 16 Jun 2003, Bill Nottingham wrote: > > > > > > > James Olin Oden ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said: > > > > > and looked at things. The last syscall

Re: DEBUG output in init causes fifo to be ignored...

2003-06-16 Thread James Olin Oden
On Mon, 16 Jun 2003, Bill Nottingham wrote: > James Olin Oden ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said: > > On Mon, 16 Jun 2003, Bill Nottingham wrote: > > > > > James Olin Oden ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said: > > > > and looked at things. The last syscall I see init in after > > > > running the init 6, is: > > >

Re: DEBUG output in init causes fifo to be ignored...

2003-06-16 Thread James Olin Oden
On Mon, 16 Jun 2003, Bill Nottingham wrote: > James Olin Oden ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said: > > On Mon, 16 Jun 2003, Bill Nottingham wrote: > > > > > James Olin Oden ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said: > > > > and looked at things. The last syscall I see init in after > > > > running the init 6, is: > > >

Re: DEBUG output in init causes fifo to be ignored...

2003-06-16 Thread Bill Nottingham
James Olin Oden ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said: > On Mon, 16 Jun 2003, Bill Nottingham wrote: > > > James Olin Oden ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said: > > > and looked at things. The last syscall I see init in after > > > running the init 6, is: > > > > > > futex(0x4212f1f4, FUTEX_WAIT, -1, NULL > > > >

Re: DEBUG output in init causes fifo to be ignored...

2003-06-16 Thread James Olin Oden
On Mon, 16 Jun 2003, Bill Nottingham wrote: > James Olin Oden ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said: > > and looked at things. The last syscall I see init in after > > running the init 6, is: > > > > futex(0x4212f1f4, FUTEX_WAIT, -1, NULL > > What glibc are you running? > I am running: glibc

Re: DEBUG output in init causes fifo to be ignored...

2003-06-16 Thread Bill Nottingham
James Olin Oden ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said: > and looked at things. The last syscall I see init in after > running the init 6, is: > > futex(0x4212f1f4, FUTEX_WAIT, -1, NULL What glibc are you running? Bill ___ Redhat-devel-list mailing list

Re: DEBUG output in init causes fifo to be ignored...

2003-06-16 Thread James Olin Oden
On Fri, 13 Jun 2003, James Olin Oden wrote: > I was experience a problem with init (not running rc scripts; I will deal > with this in seperate email), and so I pulled down the SysVinit srpm > and rebuilt it with DEBUG set to 1 in init.h. This cause init to print > lots of nice debug output, but.

Re: exec-shield problems

2003-06-14 Thread Adam Polkosnik
Chris, I tend not to trust people who can't spell, because md5sums of their thoughts and their deeds are not matching. Jokes aside, let me restate my question and explain that I'm fully aware what rawhide is, and that you may want to go patronize newbies in #linuxhelp. I merely wanted to state that

Re: exec-shield problems

2003-06-14 Thread Chris Chabot
Honestly, judging your level of expertise by this email i would advice not running rawhide or exec-shield. It's not 'blessed' software, nor is it 'known to work'. It's not even 'beta' software! It's not called 'bleeding-edge' for nothing ;-) If you read the docs & anouncements for exec-shield,

Re: kudzu question

2003-06-13 Thread Bill Nottingham
Vijay Patil ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said: >I was going through the PS2 detection routines > in the kudzu code (psaux.c) and struck a problem > there. I tried copying the psauxProbe() function and > mouse_read(), mouse_cmd() functions to another C file > and running it (after removing the psaux

Re: Two pthread libraries on Red Hat 9

2003-06-12 Thread Don Dade
Hi Thomas, I don't really know what these two libraries are, but I would use some sort of sync to make sure that the main thread doesn't exit before the spawned one even starts. I do know that LinuxThreads doesn't necessarily immediately start the thread spawned by pthread_create(). Maybe the

RE: Network bandwitdth

2003-06-11 Thread Tarhon-Onu Victor
On Wed, 11 Jun 2003, Steve Dixon wrote: > at the reference guide there aren't any parameters that I can pass the > card with /etc/modules.conf. Can someone from redhat confirm this? Please use mii-tool to see if the lan card negociaded properly the speed and duplex with the other equipme

RE: Network bandwitdth

2003-06-11 Thread Steve Dixon
ehalf Of Tony Nugent Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2003 6:16 PM To: RedHat Development Mailing List Subject: Re: Network bandwitdth On Tue Jun 10 2003 at 08:17, "Steve Dixon" wrote: > I have a quick question that I havent been able to figure out. We are > on a fiber connection to the

Re: Network bandwitdth

2003-06-11 Thread Tony Nugent
On Tue Jun 10 2003 at 08:17, "Steve Dixon" wrote: > I have a quick question that I havent been able to figure out. We are > on a fiber connection to the internet which gives us about 3Mbps. We > have a windows 2000 server that has been used as a gateway and is able > to take full use of the bandw

Re: ppc64

2003-06-10 Thread Franz Sirl
At 03:05 09.06.2003, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, 8 Jun 2003, Balint Cristian wrote: > A asure you too from my ibook: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] FILMS]# rpm -qa | grep glibc > glibc-kernheaders-2.4-8.17 > glibc-common-2.3.2-48 > glibc-devel-2.3.2-48 > glibc-2.3.2-48 > [EMAIL PROTECTED] FILMS]# teln

Re: ppc64

2003-06-08 Thread Bill Nottingham
Balint Cristian ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said: > _ALL_ ppc rawhide now are 32 bit except kernel and glibc64 (the 64bit version > of glibc).I think (maybe i am wrong) redhat killed ppc64 tree the 64 bit > version of rawhide because of idea that on real 64 bit machines only kernel > is running 64 bit

Re: ppc64

2003-06-08 Thread ncjeffgus
On Sun, 8 Jun 2003, Balint Cristian wrote: > A asure you too from my ibook: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] FILMS]# rpm -qa | grep glibc > glibc-kernheaders-2.4-8.17 > glibc-common-2.3.2-48 > glibc-devel-2.3.2-48 > glibc-2.3.2-48 > [EMAIL PROTECTED] FILMS]# telnet rezso.rdsor.ro 22 > Trying 212.93.155.178.

Re: ppc64

2003-06-08 Thread Balint Cristian
On Sunday 08 June 2003 14:22, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Sun, 8 Jun 2003, Elliot Lee wrote: > > On Sun, 8 Jun 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > It's an iBook. Rawhide has amazingly worked pretty well on this > > > iBook. :) And it work well !! > You are restating my point. I wanted

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >