Re: Coping with package splits and name changes (Was: Latest Raw Hide missing packages)

2001-01-17 Thread Matt Wilson
On Wed, Jan 17, 2001 at 04:21:19PM -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > > "PS" == Pekka Savola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > PS> I haven't done this myself, but wrapping up some magic that'd fetch all > PS> the headers and check for Obsoletes: field might work. > > Is that the method that

Re: Coping with package splits and name changes (Was: Latest Raw Hide missing packages)

2001-01-17 Thread Jason L Tibbitts III
> "PS" == Pekka Savola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: PS> I haven't done this myself, but wrapping up some magic that'd fetch all PS> the headers and check for Obsoletes: field might work. Is that the method that the upgrader uses? It seems that would handle a rename but might not handle a pac

Coping with package splits and name changes (Was: Latest Raw Hide missing packages)

2001-01-17 Thread Jason L Tibbitts III
> "BR" == Bernhard Rosenkraenzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: BR> kernel-utils is obsolete, use the new ksymoops package. I'm curious: is there some way to cope with packages changing names or splitting other than doing it by hand? Obviously the updater knows how to do it, but I don't know h

Re: Latest Raw Hide missing packages

2001-01-14 Thread Bernhard Rosenkraenzer
On Sun, 14 Jan 2001, Bill Crawford wrote: > ftp.redhat.com appears to be missing kernel-utils ? kernel-utils is obsolete, use the new ksymoops package. LLaP bero ___ Redhat-devel-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mail

Latest Raw Hide missing packages

2001-01-14 Thread Bill Crawford
ftp.redhat.com appears to be missing kernel-utils ? -- /* Bill Crawford, Unix Systems Developer, ebOne, formerly GTS Netcom */ #include "stddiscl.h" ___ Redhat-devel-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/re